Walking on eggshells
Some ethical issues in research with people in vulnerable situations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24834/educare.2009.4.1248Keywords:
Ethical and methodological issues, researching vulnerable peopleAbstract
This article takes up some of the ethical issues at stake when qualitative inquiry involves people in vulnerable situations, such as the young, the very old, the sick or disabled or minority groups – people, in short, who are often labelled as “the other”. Ethical issues and dilemmas appear at every juncture of the research process and also when the researcher decides what to publish and why. The article starts with some of the issues and experiences the author brings to the table after working in the field of inclusive education and disability research for over three decades. Next it offers some notes on qualitative inquiry and then it moves on to explore the ethics, ethical issues and dilemmas inevitably part and parcel of all such inquiry. Then it applies examples from the author’s fieldwork to the discussion of ethical issues and dilemmas in qualitative encountered in qualitative research with people in vulnerable situations. Examples are in particular drawn from the authors recent study that involved interviews with Icelandic parents of disabled children. The ethical issues and dilemmas touched upon include those related to gaining access, the interview situation itself, including the building of rapport and the fine line between gathering the data, data analysis, ethical issues related to what to select from privileged knowledge, and other things that concern the writing up of sensitive data. Finally, some thought is given to publications, their interpretations by the reader and their use or abuse.
References
Barnes, Colin, Mercer, Geoff & Shakespeare, Tom (1999). Exploring disability: A Sociological introduction. Cambridge, Policy Press.
Bogdan, Robert C. & Biklen, Sari K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. 4th ed. New York, Pearson Education grp.
Bjarnason, Dora S. (2002). New voices in Iceland: Parents and adult children juggling supports and choices in time and space. Disability and society, 17(3), 307-327.
Bjarnason, Dora S. (2003). School inclusion in Iceland: The cloak of invisibility. In: B. T. Peck (Ed) Education: Emerging goals in a new millennium. New York, Nova Science Publishers.
Bjarnason, Dora S. (2004). New voices from Iceland: Disability and young adulthood. New York, Nova Science Publishers.
Bjarnason, Dora S. (2009). Parents and professionals: An uneasy partnership? In J. Allan, J. Ozga and G. Smyth Social capital, professionalism and diversity: New relations in urban schools. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Charlton, James (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability, oppression and empowerment. Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.
Christians, Clifford G. (2000). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd Ed) (pp. 133-155). Thousand Oaks. Sage publications.
De Laine, Marlene (2000). Fieldwork, participation and practice: Ethics and dilemmas in qualitative research. London, Sage publications.
Disability & Society (2007). A review symposium. 22(2), 230-234.
Ferguson, Dianne L. (2009). Personal communication.
Ferguson, Phil M. (2001). Mapping the family: Disability studies and the exploration of parental responses to disability. In G. L. Albrect, K. D. Seelman and M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 372-395). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Ferguson, Dianne L. & Ferguson Phil M. (1993). The promise of adulthood. Columbus OH, Macmillan.
Ferguson, Dianne L. & Ferguson Phil M. (1995). The interpretivist view of special education and disability: The value of telling stories. In T. M. Skrtic (ed.) Disability and democracy: Reconstructing special education for postmodernity (pp. 104-122). New York, Teachers College Press.
Finch, Janet (1984). ”It’s great to have someone to talk to”: The ethics and politics of interviewing women. In C. Bell & H. Roberts (Eds.) Social researching: Politics, problems and practice (pp. 70-87). London, Routledge and Kegan, Paul.
Oakeley, Ann (1979). Becoming a Mother. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
Oakeley, Ann (1981). Subject Women. Oxford: Martin Robertson. New York, Pantheon.
O’Brien, Ruth (2001). Crippled justice: The history of modern disability policy in the workplace. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Oliver, Mike (1990). The politics of disablement: Critical texts in social work and the welfare state. Basingstoke, Macmillan.
Oliver, Mike (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. Basingstoke, Macmillan.
Oliver, Mike (2007). Review symposium, Disability and Society,22(2), 232-234
Punch, Maurice (1998). Politics and ethics in qualitative research. In: N. K. Denzin & Y. S Lincoln (Eds), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (pp 156-184). Thousand Oakes, Sage Publications.
Schwandt, Thomas A. (2001). Dictionary of qualitative inquiry (2nd Ed). Thousand Oakes, Sage Publications.
Shakespeare, Tom (2006). Disability rights and wrongs. London, Rouledge. http://www.sahealthinfo.org/ethics/ethicsqualitative.htm. Retrieved 15th April 2009.
Skrtic Thomas M. (Ed) (1999). Disability and democracy: Reconstructing special education for postmodernity. New York, Teachers College Press: 104-122.
Turnbull, Ann & Turnbull, Rud (Eds) (2005). Families, professionals and exceptionality. New York, Prentice Hall.
Vehmas, Simo (2008). Philosophy and science: The axes of evil in disability studies? Journal of Medical Ethics, 34, 21-23.
White, Thomas (1993). Business ethics: A philosophical reader. New York, Macmillan
Wolcott, Harry F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oakes, Sage Publications.
Wolcott, Harry F. (1995). The art of fieldwork. Walnut Creek, Alta Mira Press.
