Understanding Collaboration Between a Local Education Administration and Principals from the Perspective of Contradictions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63310/edu.2025.2.54823Keywords:
Cultural-Historical Activity Theory, discursive manifestations of contradictions, Local education administration, principalsAbstract
Despite the recognition of the local education administration (LEA) as a pivotal actor in the enhancement of quality, previous research incorporating both the LEA and school principals remains scarce. The current study aims to enhance the understanding of different types of discursive contradictions in collaboration and explore the possible consequences of contradictions between the LEA and principals. Using a qualitative study design, this study draws on interviews with superintendents, LEA managers, qualitative strategists, and principals. The theoretical framework is based on discursive manifestations of contradictions. The results reveal that different types of contradictions are discernible in the collaboration between the LEA and principals. The empirical findings show disparate contradictions, including contradictory interpretations of the LEA's role and mission, the ambiguous division of responsibilities, and the asymmetrical distribution of knowledge and communication. A central conclusion is the importance of LEAs and principals working together to negotiate their interpretations of contradictions, which could enable opportunities for contradictions to become a positive driving force for improvements. The study enriches the knowledge of contradictions in collaboration, thereby offering valuable insights for propelling further research on school improvement.
References
Addi-Raccah, A., & Gavish, Y. (2010). The LEA’s role in a decentralized school system: The school principals’ view. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 38(2), 184–201. doi: 10.1177/1741143209356361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143209356361
Adolfsson, C.-H., & Alvunger, D. (2017). The nested systems of local school development: Understanding improved interaction and capacities in the different subsystems of schools. Improving Schools, 20(3), 195–208. doi: 10.1177/1365480217710874 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480217710874
Adolfsson, C.-H., & Alvunger, D. (2020). Power dynamics and policy actions in the changing landscape of local school governance. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(2), 128–142. doi: 10.1080/20020317.2020.1745621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1745621
ALLEA. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity – Revised Edition 2023. Berlin. 10.26356/ECOC.
Anderson, E., & Young, M. D. (2018). If they knew then, what we know now, why have not things changed? An examination of district effectiveness research. Frontiers in education (Lausanne), 3. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2018.00087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00087
Andersson, K., & Liljenberg, M. (2020). 'Tell us what, but not how' - Understanding intraorganizational trust among principals and LEA officials in a decentralized school system. School Leadership & Management, 40(5), 465–482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1832980
Bennett, N., & Anderson, L. (2005). School-LEA partnerships: Recipe for success or chimera? Journal of Educational Change, 6(1), 29–50. doi: 10.1007/s10833-004-7779-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-004-7779-z
Bentley, T. (2010). Innovation and diffusion as a theory of change. In Second International Handbook of Educational Change (pp. 29–46). Springer Netherlands. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-2660-6_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2660-6_2
Blossing, U., & Ekholm, M. (2008). A central school reform program in Sweden and the local response: Taking the long-term view works. Urban Education, 43(6), 624–652. doi: 10.1177/0042085907311828 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085907311828
Brannick, T., & Coghlan, D. (2007). In defense of being “Native”: The case for insider academic research. Organizational Research Methods, 10(1), 59–74. doi: 10.1177/1094428106289253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106289253
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise, and Health, 11(4), 589–597. doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Daly, A. J., Finnigan, K. S., & Che, J. (2013). Systemwide reform in districts under pressure: The role of social networks in defining, acquiring, using, and diffusing research evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(4), 476–497. doi: 10.1108/09578231311325668 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311325668
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. doi: 10.1080/13639080020028747 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080123238
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2011). Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts: A methodological framework. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 368–387. doi: 10.1108/09534811111132758 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811111132758
Farrell, C. C., & Coburn, C. E. (2017). Absorptive capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding district central office learning. Journal of Educational Change, 18(2), 135–159. doi: 10.1007/s10833-016-9291-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-016-9291-7
Fleming, J. (2018). Recognizing and resolving the challenges of being an insider researcher in work-integrated learning. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 19(3), 311.
Fullan, M. (2016). The NEW meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, Teachers College Press, Ontario Principals’ Council.
Greany, T. (2022). Place-based governance and leadership in decentralized school systems: Evidence from England. Journal of Education Policy, 37(2), 247–268. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2020.1792554 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1792554
Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2019). Leading professional learning with impact. School Leadership & Management, 39(1), 1–4. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2018.1530892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2018.1530892
Henriksen, Ø. (2018). Making sense across levels in local school governance: Dialogue meetings between a superintendent and subordinated school leaders. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education, 2(2–3), 119–133. doi: 10.7577/njcie.2752 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.2752
Honig, M. I. (2008). District central offices as learning organizations: How sociocultural and organizational learning theories elaborate district central office administrators’ participation in teaching and learning improvement efforts. American Journal of Education, 114(4), 627–664. doi: 10.1086/589317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/589317
Hooge, E. H., Moolenaar, N. M., van Look, K. C. J., Janssen, S. K., & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2019). The role of district leaders for organization social capital. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(3), 296–316. doi: 10.1108/JEA-03-2018-0045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-03-2018-0045
Håkansson, J. (2016). Organising and leading systematic quality work in the preschool - preschool managers’ perspectives. School Leadership & Management, 36(3), 292–310. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2016.1247043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2016.1247043
Håkansson, J., & Adolfsson, C.-H. (2022). Local education authority’s quality management within a coupled school system: Strategies, actions, and tensions. Journal of Educational Change, 23(3), 291–314. doi: 10.1007/s10833-021-09414-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09414-6
Iatarola, P., & Fruchte, N. (2004). District effectiveness: A study of investment strategies in New York City public schools and districts. Educational Policy, 18(3), 491–512. doi: 10.1177/0895904804265020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904804265020
Jarl, M., & Pierre, J. (2018). Skolan som politisk organisation. Gleerups.
Jarl, M., & Rönnberg, L. (2019). Skolpolitik. Från riksdagshus till klassrum. Liber.
Larsson, S. (2022). Facets of quality in qualitative research. In Oxford research encyclopedia of education. Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1707 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1707
Leithwood, K. (2010). Characteristics of school districts that are exceptionally effective in closing the achievement gap. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(3), 245–291. doi: 10.1080/15700761003731500 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15700761003731500
Leithwood, K., Sun, J., & McCullough, C. (2019). How school districts influence student achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(5), 519–539. doi: 10.1108/JEA-09-2018-0175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2018-0175
Liljenberg, M., & Andersson, K. (2021). Relations between an improving Swedish LEA and school principals with joint quality and improvement responsibilities. Education Inquiry, 12(2), 147–162. doi: 10.1080/20004508.2020.1802851 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1802851
Moos, L., Johansson, O., & Day, C. (2011). How school principals sustain success over time: International perspectives (1st ed., Vol. 14). Springer Nature. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-1335-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1335-2_1
Paulsen, J. M., Johansson, O., Moos, L., Nihlfors, E., Risku, M., & Ärlestig, D. (2014). Superintendent leadership under shifting governance regimes. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(7), 812–822. doi: 10.1108/IJEM-07-2013-0103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-07-2013-0103
Paulsen, J. M., & Høyer, H. C. (2016). External Control and Professional Trust in Norwegian School Governing: Synthesis from a Nordic Research Project. Nordic Studies in Education, 36(2), 86–102. doi: 10.18261/issn.1891-5949-2016-02-02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-5949-2016-02-02
Prøitz, T. S., Mausethagen, S., & Skedsmo, G. (2021). District administrators’ governing styles in the enactment of data-use practices. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 24(2), 244–265. doi: 10.1080/13603124.2018.1562097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2018.1562097
Pyhältö, K., Soini, T., & Pietarinen, J. (2011). A systemic perspective on school reform: Principals' and chief education officers' perspectives on school development. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(1), 46–61. doi: 10.1108/09578231111102054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111102054
Rogers, L. K. (2022). Is role change enough? District organizational supports for principal supervision. Educational Administration Quarterly, 58(4), 527–560. doi: 10.1177/0013161X221081828 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X221081828
SFS 2010:800. Education Act. Utbildningsdepartementet. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/skollag-2010800_sfs-2010-800/.
Stein, M. K., Hubbard, L., & Toure, J. (n.d.). Travel of district-wide approaches to instructional improvement: How can districts learn from one another? In Second International Handbook of Educational Change (pp. 781–805). Springer Netherlands. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-2660-6_44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2660-6_44
Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner (2023). Classification of Swedish municipalities. https://skr.se/en/skr/tjanster/kommunerochregioner/faktakommunerochregioner/kommungruppsindelning.2051.html.
Swaffield, S. (2005). No sleeping partners: Relationships between head teachers and critical friends. School Leadership & Management, 25(1), 43–57. doi: 10.1080/1363243052000317082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1363243052000317082
Trujillo, T. (2013). The reincarnation of the effective schools research: Rethinking the literature on district effectiveness. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(4), 426–452. doi: 10.1108/09578231311325640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311325640
Vennebo, K. F., & Aas, M. (2022). Leadership and change in a Norwegian school context: Tensions as productive driving forces. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 50(6), 963–978. doi: 10.1177/1741143220962102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220962102
Wermke, W., Nordholm, D., Anderson, A. I., & Kotavuopio-Olsson, R. (2024). Deconstructing autonomy: The case of principals in the North of Europe. European Educational Research Journal EERJ, 23(3), 347–365. doi: 10.1177/14749041221138626 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041221138626
Yin, R.K. (2014). Case study research: design and methods. Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sofie Lökholm
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
