The European Advantage in Empirical Comparative Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62355/ejels.24727Keywords:
empirical legal studies, comparative law, empirical comparative law, research methods, law journals, content analysisAbstract
Empirical legal studies in Europe lag behind developments in the US. By contrast, comparative law is a prominent field of research and teaching in many European countries, while it plays a more limited role in the US. Thus, as we combine empirical studies and comparative law (a.k.a. “empirical comparative law”), European legal scholarship may have at least a partial advantage over its US counterpart. In this paper, a content analysis of working papers and journal articles provides evidence of a stronger propensity of European scholars to include a comparative dimension in work of empirical legal studies. The paper also categorises the different methods with which Europe scholars have already conducted research in empirical comparative law. Doing so also shows how expertise in comparative law is crucial in making full use of this form of empirical legal research. Thus, despite some challenges, this paper suggests that European research in empirical comparative law should have a promising future.References
Adams, Maurice (2011). Doing What Doesn’t Come Naturally: On the Distinctiveness of Comparative Law, in Mark Van Hoecke (ed.), Methodologies of Legal Research: Which Kind of Method for What Kind of Discipline?, Oxford: Hart, pp. 229–240. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472560896.ch-012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472560896.ch-012
Arrighetti, Alessandro, Reinhard Bachmann and Simon Deakin (1997). Contract Law, Social Norms, and Inter-firm Cooperation, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 21: 171–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a013665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a013665
Bartie, Susan (2010). The Lingering Core of Legal Scholarship, Legal Studies, 30: 345–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2010.00169.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2010.00169.x
Bavli, Hillel J. (2022). Credibility in Empirical Legal Analysis, Brooklyn Law Review 87: 501–556.
Beuscher, J. H. (1963). Agriculture in a Multi-state World: A Plea for Empirical Comparative Legal Studies, available at https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pnrab022.pdf.
Bijleveld, Catrien (2023). Research Methods for Empirical Legal Studies: An Introduction, The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.
Blankenburg, Erhard (1998). Patterns of Legal Culture: The Netherlands Compared to Neighboring Germany, American Journal of Comparative Law, 46: 1–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/841077. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/841077
Braun, Reiner, Horst Eidenmüller, Andreas Engert and Lars Hornuf (2013). Does Charter Competition Foster Entrepreneurship? A Difference-in-Difference Approach to European Company Law Reforms. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51: 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12003
Bussani, Mauro, Sabino Cassese and Marta Infantino (2023). Comparative Legal Metrics: Quantification of Performances as Regulatory Technique, Leiden: E.J. Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004680944
Caffera, Gerardo, Rodrigo Momberg and María Elisa Morales (2024). Legal Transplants: A Case Study of Private Law in Its Historical Context, in Mathias Siems and Po Jen Yap (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Comparative Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914741.026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914741.026
Chin, Jason M. and Kathryn Zeiler (2021). Replicability: Replicability in Empirical Legal Research, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 17: 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120920-084221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-121620-085055
Clark, David S. (ed.) 2012. Comparative Law and Society, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781006092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781006092
Cohn, Margit (2024). Legal Transplants: A Theoretical Framework and a Case Study from Public Law, in Mathias Siems and Po Jen Yap (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Comparative Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914741.025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914741.025
D’Andrea, Sabrina Nikita Divissenko, Maria Fanou, Anna Krisztián, Jaka Kukavica, Nastazja Potocka-Sionek and Mathias Siems (2021). Asymmetric Cross-citations in Private Law: An Empirical Study of 28 Supreme Courts in the EU, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 28: 498–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X211014693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X211014693
Dau-Schmidt, Kenneth G. and Carmen L. Brun (2005). Lost in Translation: The Economic Analysis of Law in the United States and Europe, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 44: 602–621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.661641
De Witte, Folker, Anna Krisztián, Jaka Kukavica, Nastazja Potocka-Sionek, Mathias Siems and Vasiliki Yiatrou (2024). Decoding Judicial Cross-Citations: How Do European Judges Engage with Foreign Case Law?, American Journal of Comparative Law, forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avae021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avae021
Deakin, Simon, Prabirjit Sarkar and Mathias Siems (2018). Is There a Relationship Between Shareholder Protection and Stock Market Development?, Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting, 3: 115–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/108.00000025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1561/108.00000025
Dibadj, Reza (2017). Transatlantic Publication Fashions: In Search of Quality and Methodology in Law Journal Articles, in Rob van Gestel, Hans Micklitz and Edward L. Rubin (eds.), Rethinking Legal Scholarship: A Transatlantic Interchange, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 173–203. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316442906.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316442906.005
Eidenmüller, Horst, Andreas Engert and Lars Hornuf (2015). Where Do Firms Issue Debt? An Empirical Analysis of Issuer Location and Regulatory Competition in Europe, International Review of Law and Economics, 41: 103–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2014.10.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2014.10.007
Engel, Christoph and Lars Freund (2017). Behaviorally Efficient Remedies – An Experiment, MPI Collective Goods Preprint, No. 2017/17. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2988653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2988653
Engel, Christoph (2018). Empirical Methods for the Law, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 174: 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1628/093245617X15096094637968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1628/093245617X15096094637968
Engel, Christoph and Wolfgang Schön (2007). Vorwort, in Christoph Engel and Wolfgang Schön (eds.), Das Proprium der Rechtswissenschaft (Tübingen, Mohr, 2007). https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-160884-1. (English version of the preface available at https://web.archive.org/web/20100715023644/www.coll.mpg.de/book/cii48-proper-task-academic-law).
Epstein, Lee and Gary King (2022). The Rules of Inference, University of Chicago Law Review, 69: 1–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1600349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1600349
Epstein, Lee, Gunnar Grendstad, Urška Šadl and Keren Weinshall (2024). Introduction to the Study of Comparative Judicial Behaviour, in Lee Epstein et al. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Judicial Behaviour (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024, forthcoming). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192898579.013.49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192898579.001.0001
Fabri, Marco (2017). Methodological Issues in the Comparative Analysis of the Number of Judges, Administrative Personnel, and Court Performance Collected by the Commission for the Efficiency of Justice of the Council of Europe, Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 7: 616–639.
Ferrari, Giuseppe Franco and Michele Graziadei (2024). Comparative Law in the Classroom: The Italian Way, Paper presented at the 5th Thematic Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law in Paris.
Gardella Tedeschi, Bianca (2024). Italian Comparative: A Trait of the Legal System, FIU Law Review 18: 797–820. https://doi.org/10.25148/lawrev.18.4.9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25148/lawrev.18.4.9
Garoupa, Nuno and Thomas S. Ulen (2008). The Market for Legal Innovation: Law and Economics in Europe and the United States, Alabama Law Review, 59: 1555–1633.
Garoupa, Nuno and Thomas S. Ulen (2021). Comparative Law and Economics: Aspirations and Hard Realities, American Journal of Comparative Law, 69: 664–688. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avab023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avab023
Garoupa, Nuno (2022). Trends in Comparative Law and Economics, London: Anthem Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2svjxwn
Gelter, Martin (2024). Minimum Capital and Cross-Border Firm Formation in Europe, Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting, 8, forthcoming.
Gerner-Beuerle, Carsten, Federico Mucciarelli, Edmund Schuster and Mathias Siems (2016). Study on the Law Applicable to Companies, Report for EU Commission, DG Justice, commissioned by LSE Enterprise. https://dx.doi.org/10.2838/527231.
Gerner-Beuerle, Carsten, Federico Mucciarelli, Edmund Schuster and Mathias Siems (2018). Why Do Businesses Incorporate in Other EU Member States? An Empirical Analysis of the Role of Conflict of Laws Rules, International Review of Law and Economics, 56: 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2018.05.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2018.05.002
Ghezelbash, Daniel (2018). Refugee Lost: Asylum Law in an Interdependent World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108349031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108349031
Gibson, James L. and Gregory A. Caldeira (1996). The Legal Cultures of Europe, Law and Society Review, 30: 55–86. https://doi.org/10.2307/3054034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3054034
Goanta, Catalina (2016). Convergence in European Consumer Sales Law, Antwerp: Intersentia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780685168
Goanta, Catalina and Mathias Siems (2019). ‘What Determines National Convergence of EU Law? Measuring the Implementation of Consumer Sales Law’, Legal Studies, 39: 714–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2019.8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2019.8
Goderis, Benedikt and Mila Versteeg (2014). The Diffusion of Constitutional Rights, International Review of Law and Economics, 39: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2014.04.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2014.04.004
Hesselink, Martijn (2001). The New European Legal Culture, Deventer: Kluwer.
Ho, Han-wei, Patrick Chung-Chia Huang and Yun-chien Chang (2024). Machine-Learning Methods, in Mathias Siems and Po Jen Yap (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Comparative Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 177–208. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914741.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914741.012
Hoffman, Peter Toll (2012). Teaching Theory versus Practice: Are We Training Lawyers or Plumbers, Michigan State Law Review, 2012: 625–646.
Hornuf, Lars, Abdulkadir Mohamed and Armin Schwienbacher (2019). The Economic Impact of Forming a European Company, Journal of Common Market Studies, 57: 659–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12839
Husa, Jaakko (2018). Advanced Introduction to Law and Globalisation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788116473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788116473
Husa, Jaakko (2022). Interdisciplinary Comparative Law: Rubbing Shoulders with the Neighbours or Standing Alone in a Crowd, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802209785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802209785
Huxley, Andrew (1997). Review: Golden Yoke, Silken Text, Yale Law Journal, 106: 1885–951. https://doi.org/10.2307/797322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/797322
Hyland, Richard (2009). Gifts: A Study in Comparative Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195343366.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195343366.001.0001
Jamin, Christophe and William van Caenegem (2016). The Internationalisation of Legal Education: General Report, in Christophe Jamin and William van Caenegem (eds.) The Internationalisation of Legal Education, Cham: Springer, pp. 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29125-3_1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29125-3_1
Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, Elena and Jaroslaw Kantorowicz (2024). Law & Economics at Sixty: Mapping the Field with Bibliometric and Machine Learning Tools, Journal of Economic Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12613
Kennedy, David and William W. Fisher (eds.) (2006). The Canon of American Legal Thought, Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv39x51k. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv39x51k
La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer and Robert Vishny (1998). Law and Finance, Journal of Political Economy, 106: 1113–55. https://doi.org/10.1086/250042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/250042
Lanneau, Régis (2014). Dogmatics in Comparison to US-American Law and Economics – Dogmatism as a Cultural Element of Law in Europe?, in Geneviève Helleringer and Kai Purnhagen (eds.), Towards a European Legal Culture. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 25–50. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472561756.ch-002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472561756.ch-002
Linos, Katerina (2013). The Democratic Foundations of Policy Diffusion: How Health, Family, and Employment Laws Spread Across Countries, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199967865.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199967865.001.0001
Mahy, Petra et al. (2024). Qualitative Fieldwork, in Mathias Siems and Po Jen Yap (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Comparative Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914741.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914741.009
Mattei, Ugo (1998). An Opportunity Not to Be Missed: The Future of Comparative Law in the United States, American Journal of Comparative Law, 46: 709–718. https://doi.org/10.2307/840988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/840988
Mattei, Ugo (2002). Some Realism about Comparativism: Comparative Law Teaching in the Hegemonic Jurisdiction, American Journal of Comparative Law, 50: 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/50.suppl1.87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/50.suppl1.87
Micklitz, Hans-W. (2017). A European Advantage in Legal Scholarship?, in Rob van Gestel, Hans Micklitz and Edward L. Rubin (eds.), Rethinking Legal Scholarship: A Transatlantic Interchange, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 262–309. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316442906.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316442906.008
Minow, Martha (2010). The Controversial Status of International and Comparative Law in the United States, Harvard International Law Journal online, available at http://www.harvardilj.org/2010/08/online_52_minow/.
Naroll, Raoul (1965). Galton’s Problem: The Logic of Cross Cultural Analysis, Social Research, 32: 428–451.
Nelken, David (2007). Defining and Using the Concept of Legal Culture, in Esin Örücü and David Nelken (eds.), Comparative Law: A Handbook, Oxford: Hart, 109–132. http://doi.org/10.5040/9781509955558.ch-005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509955558.ch-005
Newton, Brent E. (2010), Preaching What They Don’t Practice: Why Law Faculties’ Preoccupation with Impractical Scholarship and Devaluation of Practical Competencies Obstruct Reform in the Legal Academy, South Carolina Law Review, 62: 105–156.
Örücü, Esin (2007). ‘A Project: Comparative Law in Action’ in Esin Örücü and David Nelken (eds.) Comparative Law: A Handbook, Oxford: Hart, pp. 435–49. http://doi.org/10.5040/9781509955558.ch-019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509955558.ch-019
Pavone, Tommaso and Øyvind Stiansen (2022). The Shadow Effect of Courts: Judicial Review and the Politics of Preemptive Reform, American Political Science Review, 116: 322–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000873
Reimann, Mathias (2002). The Progress and Failure of Comparative Law in the Second Half of the Twentieth Century, American Journal of Comparative Law, 50: 671–700. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/50.4.671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/50.4.671
Renneboog, Luc, Peter G. Szilagyi and Cara Vansteenkiste (2017). Creditor Rights, Claims Enforcement, and Bond Performance in Mergers and Acquisitions, Journal of International Business Studies 48: 174–194. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-016-0031-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-016-0031-2
Roberts, Anthea (2017). Is International Law International?, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190696412.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190696412.001.0001
Sacco, Rodolfo (1991). Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law, American Journal of Comparative Law, 39: 1–34 and 343–401. https://doi.org/10.2307/840669 and https://doi.org/10.2307/840784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/840784
Šadl, Urška (2022). Who Needs the European Society for Empirical Legal Studies?, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 29: 643–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X231160067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X231160067
Schnyder, Gerhard, Mathias Siems and Ruth Aguilera (2021). Twenty Years of ‘Law and Finance’: What Concept of Law?, Socio-Economic Review, 19: 377-406. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy041
Shackell, Cameron and Lance De Vine (2022). Quantifying the Genericness of Trademarks Using Natural Language Processing: An Introduction with Suggested Metrics, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 30: 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-021-09291-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-021-09291-7
Siems, Mathias (2007). The End of Comparative Law, Journal of Comparative Law, 2/2: 133–50.
Siems, Mathias (2016). Varieties of Legal Systems: Towards a New Global Taxonomy, Journal of Institutional Economics, 12: 579–602. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137415000545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137415000545
Siems, Mathias (2019a). The Power of Comparative Law: What Type of Units Can Comparative Law Compare?, American Journal of Comparative Law, 67: 861–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avz030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avz030
Siems, Mathias (2019b). New Directions in Comparative Law, in Mathias Reimann and Reinhard Zimmermann (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2nd edn., pp. 852–874. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198810230.013.48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198810230.013.48
Siems, Mathias (2021). Foreign-trained Legal Scholars in the UK: ‘Irritants’ or ‘Change Agents’?, Legal Studies, 41: 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2021.15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2021.15
Siems, Mathias (2022). Comparative Law, 3rd edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108892766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108892766
Siems, Mathias (2023). A Network Analysis of Judicial Cross-Citations in Europe, Law & Social Inquiry, 48: 881–905. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2022.22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2022.22
Siems, Mathias (2024). Empirical Methods, in Mathias Siems and Po Jen Yap (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Comparative Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914741.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914741.011
Siems, Mathias and Daithi Mac Síthigh (2012). Mapping Legal Research, Cambridge Law Journal, 71: 651–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197312000852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197312000852
Siems, Mathias and Daithi Mac Síthigh (2017). Why Do We Do What We Do? Comparing Legal Methods in Five Law Schools Through Survey Evidence, in Rob van Gestel, Hans Micklitz and Edward L. Rubin (eds.), Rethinking Legal Scholarship: A Transatlantic Interchange, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 31–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316442906.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316442906.002
Smits, Jan M. (2012). The Mind and Method of the Legal Academic, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857936554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857936554
Spamann, Holger (2010). The “Antidirector Rights Index” Revisited, Review of Financial Studies, 23: 468–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp067
Spamann, Holger (2015). Empirical Comparative Law, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 11: 131–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030807. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030807
Swanson, Guy E. (1971). Frameworks for Comparative Research: Structural Anthropology and the Theory of Action, in Ivan Vallier (ed.), Comparative Methods in Sociology, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 141–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520311480-007
Twining, William (2000). Globalisation and Legal Theory, London: Butterworths.
Ulen, Thomas S. (2002). A Nobel Prize in Legal Science: Theory, Empirical Work, and the Scientific Method of the Study of Law, University of Illinois Law Review, 2002: 875–920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.419823
Upham, Frank K. (2014). The Internationalization of Legal Education: National Report for the United States of America, American Journal of Comparative Law, 62 Suppl.: 97–126. https://doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2013.0019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2013.0019
van Dijck, Gijs, Shahar Sverdlov and Gabriela Buck (2018). Empirical Legal Research in Europe: Prevalence, Obstacles, and Interventions, Erasmus Law Review, 2: 105–119. https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000107
van Dijck, Gijs et al. (2020). Insolvency Judges Meet Strategic Behaviour: A Comparative Empirical Study, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 27: 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X20906669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X20906669
van Gestel, Rob, Hans-W. Micklitz and Edward L. Rubin (2017). Introduction, in Rob van Gestel, Hans Micklitz and Edward L. Rubin (eds.), Rethinking Legal Scholarship: A Transatlantic Interchange, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316442906.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316442906.001
Villanueva Collao, Vanessa (2023). Empirical Methods in Comparative Law: Data Talks, Comparative Law Review, 12/2: 55–84.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mathias Siems
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
