From Doctrine to Data: Towards an Empirical Turn in European Legal Scholarship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62355/ejels.25120Keywords:
European legal scholarship, empirical legal research, doctrinal tradition, empirical turnAbstract
Empirical Legal Research (ELR) can be defined as the systematic collection and analysis of data on legal phenomenon, in a way that is verifiable, reproducible and falsifiable. Europe is a good case to study the development of ELR, notably given the long tradition of unity in legal scholarship. Of course, this tradition is that of doctrinal scholarship but, at the turn of the 20th century, it was partially challenged by the emergence of new social sciences. Nowadays, ELR implicitly challenges the division of labour that resulted from this period, by using social science methods to grasp legal objects. It thus challenges normativist dogma and goes beyond legal realism. If there were any doubt about that, ELR can be considered “legal” research, notably because, at least in some cases, its object is purely legal. However, this does not mean that ELR answers the same questions as doctrinal approaches. Although ELR seems to be developing in Europe, some countries are lagging behind, for example France where interest in ELR has only been growing in recent years. At the European level, signs of growth are more tangible. This raises questions regarding the structuring of this field of research. This special issue aims to answer them.References
Acar, Thomas, Véronique Champeil-Desplats, Antonin Gelblat, and Stéphanie Hennette Vauchez. 2021. “Physionomie générale du corpus QPC et méthodologie de la recherche.” La Revue des droits de l'homme 20. https://doi.org/10.4000/revdh.12680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/revdh.12680
Alschner, Wolfgang. 2023. “Data Science for Lawyers.” University of Ottawa. Available at: https://www.datascienceforlawyers.org/.
Audren, Frédéric. 2002. “Les mondes leplaysiens du droit (1855-1914) Ou l’art et la manière d’être un ‘juriste le playsien’.” Les Etudes Sociales 135-136: 175–213.
Audren, Frédéric. 2022. “Quand les facultés de droit étaient des facultés de sciences sociales.” Droit et philosophie: Annuaire de l'Institut Michel Villey, Hors-Série 2.
Bernard, Claude. 1865. An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine. New York: Dover Publications, 2012.
Bétaille, Julien. 2022. “Le projet AEDE : Approche empirique du droit de l’environnement.” Available at: https://empiriquedroitenvironnement.wordpress.com/.
Bétaille, Julien. 2023. “Évaluer les effets du droit sur l’environnement : une idée saugrenue pour les juristes?” Revue juridique de l’environnement, n° spécial: 31–43.
Bijleveld, Catrien. 2023. Research Methods for Empirical Legal Studies: An Introduction. Amsterdam: Eleven.
Billant, Odeline. 2022. “Freeing the oceans from plastic bag pollution through law: mirage or horizon? An experiment in numerical comparative law on the shores of the Atlantic Ocean.” Phd. diss., University of Western Brittany, 506 pages. Available at: https://theses.hal.science/tel-04052691.
Boom, Willem. H. van, Pieter Desmet, and Peter Mascini. 2018. Empirical Legal Research in Action – Reflections on Methods and their Applications. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Bordère, Camille. 2023. “La justice algorithmique. Analyse comparée France/Québec d’un phénomène doctrinal.” Phd. diss., University of Bordeaux, 999 pages. Available at: https://shs.hal.science/tel-04341814v1.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1987. “The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field.” 1986, Translated by R. Terdiman. Hasting Law Journal 38: 814–853.
Brunet, Pierre, and Michel van de Kerchove. 2010. “Présentation – Sciences sociales, droit et science du droit : le regard des juristes.” Droit et Société: 267–273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/drs.075.0267
Carbonnier, Jean. 1972. Sociologie juridique. Armand Colin, Paris.
Champeil-Desplats, Véronique. 2019. “L’idée de formalisme dans la pensée juridique française du XXe siècle.” Revue de la Recherche Juridique - Droit prospectif, Cahier méthodologique 5: 1753–1769.
Champeil-Desplats, Véronique. 2023. “Methods of Legal Science (France).” In Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, edited by Mortimer Sellers and Stephan Kirste. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_732-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_732-1
Chevallier, Jacques. 2002. “Doctrine juridique et science juridique.” Droit et Société 50: 103–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/drs.050.0103
Chevallier, Jacques, and Danièle Lochak. 1978. Science administrative. Paris: LGDJ.
Colson, Renaud, and Stewart Field. 2016. “Socio-legal Studies in France: Beyond the Law Faculty.” Journal of Law and Society 43 (2): 285–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2016.00752.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2016.00752.x
Dyevre, Arthur. 2021. “Text-Mining for Lawyers: How Machine Learning Techniques Can Advance Our Understanding of Legal Discourse.” Erasmus Law Review 14 (1): 7–23. https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000191
Dyevre, Arthur. 2024. La décision juridictionnelle – Introduction à la théorie et à l'empirie du droit. Paris: Dalloz.
Dyevre, Arthur, Wessel Wijtvliet, and Nicolas Lampach. 2019. “The future of European legal scholarship: Empirical Jurisprudence.” Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 26 (3): 348–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X19840263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X19840263
Eisenberg, Theodore. 2011. “The Origins, Nature, and Promise of Empirical Legal Studies and a Response to Concerns.” University of Illinois Law Review 5: 1713–1738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1727538
Engel, Christoph. 2018. “Empirical Legal Studies: CELS and CELSE.” Review of Law & Economics. 20180007. https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2018-0007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2018-0007
Epstein, Lee, and Andrew D. Martin. 2014. An Introduction to Empirical Legal Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ganne, Yannick. 2021. L'ouverture des facultés de droit aux sciences sociales : contribution à l'étude du droit savant américain contemporain. Paris: Institut Francophone pour la Justice et la Démocratie.
Gaye-Palettes, Matthieu. 2023. “Droit et empirisme – Réflexion sur les apports des discours empiristes à la recherche juridique.” Phd. diss., Toulouse Capitole University, 677 pages. Available at: https://publications.ut-capitole.fr/id/eprint/48608/.
Genn, Hazel, Martin Partington, and Sally Wheeler. 2006. Law in the Real World – Improving Our Understanding of How Law Works. Final report and recommendations, The Nuffield Inquiry on Empirical Legal Research.
Gesualdi-Fecteau, Dalia, and Emmanuelle Bernheim. 2022. La recherche empirique en droit : méthodes et pratiques. Montréal: Éditions Thémis. Available at: https://ssl.editionsthemis.com/livres/livre-4945-la-recherche-empirique-en-droit-methodes-et-pratiques.html.
Hart, Herbert L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press Oxford, 2nd ed., 1994.
Heise, Michael. 2002. “The Past, Present, and Future of Empirical Legal Scholarship: Judicial Decision Making and the New Empiricism.” University of Illinois Law Review: 819–850.
Holtermann, Jakob v. H., and Mikael Madsen. 2015. “European New Legal Realism and International Law: How to Make International Law Intelligible.” Leiden Journal of International Law 28 (2): 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156515000047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156515000047
Holtermann, Jakob v. H. 2016. “What is Empirical in Empirical Studies of Law? A European New Legal Realist Conception.” Retfærd: Nordisk Juridisk Tidsskrift 39 (4). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2858726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2858726
Holtermann, Jakob v. H. 2021. “European New Legal Realism: Towards a Basic Science of Law.” In Research Handbook on Modern Legal Realism, edited by Shauhin Talesh, Elizabeth Mertz, and Heinz Klug, 67–81. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788117777.00013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788117777.00013
Holtermann, Jakob v. H. 2019. “Philosophical Questions at the Empirical Turn.” European Journal of Legal Studies, Special Issue: 5–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3324954
Israël, Liora. 2013. “Legalise it! The rising place of law in French sociology.” International Journal of Law in Context 9 (2): 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552313000013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552313000013
Jouanjan, Olivier. 2003. “De la vocation de notre temps pour la science du droit : modèles scientifiques et preuve de la validité des énoncés juridiques.” Revue européenne des sciences sociales 41 (128): 129–144. https://doi.org/10.4000/ress.398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ress.398
Jouanjan, Olivier. 2015. “Avant-Propos – Le souci du social : le ‘moment 1900’ de la doctrine et de la pratique juridique.” In Le « moment 1900 » - Critique sociale et critique sociologique du droit en Europe et aux États-Unis, edited by Olivier Jouanjan and Elisabeth Zoller, 13. Paris: Éditions Panthéon-Assas.
Jouanjan, Olivier, and Elisabeth Zoller, eds. 2015. Le « moment 1900 » - Critique sociale et critique sociologique du droit en Europe et aux États-Unis. Paris: Éditions Panthéon-Assas.
Katz, Daniel M., and Michael J. Bommarito. 2016. “Legal analytics course.” Available at: https://www.legalanalyticscourse.com/.
Kelsen, Hans. 1960. Pure Theory of Law. Translated by Max Knight. The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd. Clark, Berkeley: University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, 2005.
Kritzer, Herbert M. 2010. “The (Nearly) Forgotten Early Empirical Legal Research.” In The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research, edited by Peter Cane and Herbert M. Kritzer, n° 36. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542475.013.0037
Kritzer, Herbert M. 2021. Advanced introduction to Empirical Legal Studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Latour, Bruno. 2002. The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d’Etat. Translated by M. Brilman and A. Pottage. Cambridge: Polity, 2009.
Lawless, Robert M., Jennifer K. Robbennolt, and Thomas S. Ulen. 2016. Empirical Methods in Law. 2nd ed. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.
Leeuw, Frans L., with Hans Schmeets. 2016. Empirical Legal Research – A Guidance Book for Lawyers, Legislators and Regulators. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782549413
Lindholm, Johan, Libor Dušek, Elena Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, and Paulien de Winter. 2024. “Introducing the European Journal of Empirical Legal Studies: A Beacon of Empirical Inquiry in Law.” European Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 1 (1): 1–2. https://doi.org/10.62355/ejels.23800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62355/ejels.23800
Livermore, Michael A., and Daniel N. Rockmore, eds. 2019. Law as Data – Computation, Text & the Future of Legal Analysis. Santa Fe: Santa Fe Institute Press.
Melot, Romain, and Hai Vu Pham. 2012. “Protection de l’environnement et stratégies contentieuses.” Droit et société 82: 621–641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/drs.082.0621
Ost, François, and Michel van de Kerchove. 1987. “Comment concevoir aujourd'hui la science du droit ?” Déviance et Société 11 (2): 183–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/ds.1987.1508
Pannebakker, Ekaterina, Helen Pluut, Stijn Voskamp, and Wouter S. de Zanger. 2022. “Empirical legal studies in the law school curriculum in the Netherlands: what is the state of the art and where do we go from here?” The Law Teacher 56 (3): 384–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2021.2022391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2021.2022391
Perroud, Thomas. 2024. “Assiste-t-on à un renouvellement des méthodes de la recherche en droit public ?” Dalloz Actu, May 16. Available at: https://www.dalloz-actualite.fr/node/assiste-t-un-renouvellement-des-methodes-de-recherche-en-droit-public.
Philippe, Arnaud. 2022. La fabrique des jugements – Comment sont déterminées les sanctions pénales. Paris: La découverte.
Popper, Karl. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge, 2002.
Ross, Alf. 1958. On Law and Justice. Andover: Stevens & Sons Limited.
Šadl, Urška. 2019. “A method of (free) choice.” European Journal of Legal Studies, Special Issue: 1–4.
Šadl, Urška. 2022. “Who needs the European Society for Empirical Legal Studies?” Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 29 (6): 643–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X231160067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X231160067
Serverin, Evelyne. 2000. Sociologie du droit. Repères 282. Paris: La découverte.
Serverin, Evelyne. 2002. “Quels faits sociaux pour une science empirique du droit ?” Droit et Société 50: 59–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/drs.050.0059
Sileno, Giovanni, Gerasimos Spanakis, and Gijs van Dijck, eds. 2023. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Amsterdam: IOS Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA379
Van Den Bos, Kees. 2020. Empirical Legal Research – A Primer. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Van Dijck, Gijs, Shahar Sverdlov, and Gabriela Buck. 2018. “Empirical Legal Research in Europe: Prevalence, Obstacles, and Interventions.” Erasmus Law Review 2: 105–119. https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000107
Vivo, Pierpaolo, Daniel M. Katz, and J. B. Ruhl, eds. 2022. The Physics of the Law: Legal Systems Through the Prism of Complexity Science. Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/978-2-88976-129-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/978-2-88976-129-6
Vogenauer, Stefan. 2012. “Legal Scholarship.” In Max Planck Encyclopedia of European Private Law.
Wallinga, Tammo. 2011. “The Common History of European Legal Scholarship.” Erasmus Law Review 4 (1): 3–19. https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR221026712011004001002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR221026712011004001002
Wijntjens, Lianne, and Paul Verbruggen. 2024. “Methodological Accountability in Systematic Case Law Analysis.” European Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Special Issue (forthcoming).
Whalen, Ryan, ed. 2020. Computational Legal Studies – The Promise and Challenge of Data-Driven Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788977456
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Julien Bétaille
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
