Time After Time: The Effects of Small Group Forces and Institutional Features on the Pace of Adjudication
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62355/ejels.26347Keywords:
courts, decision making, disposition time, collegial court, judgesAbstract
In this paper we examine the impact of small group forces on case processing time on a high court. Extending previous research that treats case processing time as an indicator of the extent of bargaining and compromise among justices, we adopt a comparative perspective and analyze the disparities in the amount of time reserved to argue a case and the amount of time a merits panel takes to decide it. We expect that these disparities are influenced by a host of small group forces, including leadership styles, reference group identities, and professional backgrounds present in the group, levels of experience with the deliberative process, and heterogeneity in the justices’ opinions. To test our expectations, we estimate an ordinary least squares model on all cases decided on the merits by five-justice panels on the Norwegian Supreme Court from 2008 to 2023. Our findings largely lend support to our hypotheses. Moreover, we find that the relative speed of case processing on the Norwegian Supreme Court is influenced by a number of case attributes and institutional factors, of which the Court’s workload exerts the largest effect in magnitude.
References
Arguelhes, Diego Werneck, and Ivar Hartmann. 2024. "Agenda Setting." In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Judicial Behavior, ed. L. Epstein, G. Grendstad, U. Šadl and K. Weinshall. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192898579.013.25
Arnesen, Petter Kristiansen, Henrik L. Bentsen, and Gunnar Grendstad. 2018. "Internasjonalisering, sakskompleksitet og arbeidsmengde i Norges Høyesterett." Lov og Rett 57 (7):391-411. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-3061-2018-07-02
Arold, Nina-Louisa. 2010. "The Melting Pot or the Salad Bowl Revisited. Rendezvouz of Legal Cultures at the European Court of Human Rights." In Rendezvous of European Legal Cultures, ed. J. Ø. Sunde and K. E. Skodvin. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
Backer, Inge Lorange. 2014. "Goals of Civil Justice in Norway: Readiness for a Pragmatic Reform." In Goals of Civil Justice and Civil Procedure in Contemporary Judicial Systems, ed. A. Uzelac: Springer.
Backer, Inge Lorange. 2016. Norsk sivilprosess. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Bentsen, Henrik L., Gunnar Grendstad, William R. Shaffer, and Eric N. Waltenburg. 2021. "A High Court Plays the Accordion: Validating Ex Ante Case Complexity on Oral Arguments." Justice System Journal 42 (2):130–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2021.1881667
Bentsen, Henrik Litleré. 2018. "Court Leadership, Agenda Transformation, and Judicial Dissent: A European Case of a 'Mysterious Demise of Consensual Norms'." Journal of Law and Courts 6 (1):189-213. https://doi.org/10.1086/695555
Bentsen, Henrik Litleré, and Jon Kåre Skiple. 2024. "Leadership in Courts." In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Judicial Behavior, ed. L. Epstein, G. Grendstad, U. Šadl and K. Weinshall. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192898579.013.30
Bentsen, Henrik Litlere, Jon Kåre Skiple, Mark McKenzie, and Gunnar Grendstad. 2025. "The impact of judicial leadership on consensus formation: Evidence from the Supreme Court of Norway." Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 22 (1) https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12408
Black, Ryan C., Timothy R. Johnson, and Justin Wedeking. 2012. Oral Arguments and Coalition Formation on the U.S. Supreme Court: A Deliberate Dialogue. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Bårdsen, Arnfinn. 2014. "Anketillatelse til Norges Høyesterett." Lov og Rett 53 (9):529-49. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-3061-2014-09-03
Corley, Pamela C. 2017. "Opinion Writing." In The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Judicial Behavior, ed. L. Epstein and S. A. Lindquist. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Corley, Pamela C., and Artemus Ward. 2018. "Opinion Writing in the U.S. Supreme Court." In Routledge Handbook of Judicial Behavior, ed. R. M. Howard and K. A. Randazzo: Routledge.
Corley, Pamela, Amy Steigerwalt, and Artemus Ward. 2013. The Puzzle of Unanimity. Consensus on the United States Supreme Court. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Danelski, David 2002. "The Influence of the Chief Justice in the Decisional Process of the Supreme Court." In Courts, Judges, and Politics: An Introduction to the Judicial Process, ed. W. F. Murphy, C. H. Pritchett and L. Epstein.
Eagly, Alice H., and Linda L. Carli. 2003. "The Female Leadership Advantage: An Evaluation of the Evidence." The Leadership Quarterly 14 (6):807–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.004
Eisenberg, Theodore, Talia Fisher, and Issi Rosen-Zvi. 2013. "Group Decision Making on Appellate Panels: Presiding Justice and Opinion Justice Influence in the Israel Supreme Court." Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 19 (3):282-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0033565
Engel, Christoph. 2022. "Lucky You: Your Case Is Heard by a Seasoned Panel— Panel Effects in the German Constitutional Court." Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 19 (4):1179–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12327
Epstein, Lee, Gunnar Grendstad, Urška Šadl, and Keren Weinshall, eds. 2024. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Judicial Behaviour. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192898579.001.0001
Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 2022. "How Social Identity and Social Diversity Affect Judging." Leiden Journal of International Law 35:897-911. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156522000395
Escobar-Lemmon, Maria C., Valerie J. Hoekstra, Alice J. Kang, and Miki Caul Kittilson. 2021. "Breaking the Judicial Glass Ceiling: The Appointment of Women to High Courts Worldwide." The Journal of Politics 83 (2):662-74. https://doi.org/10.1086/710017
Goelzhauser, Greg, Benjamin Kassow, and Douglas Rice. 2022. "Measuring Supreme Court Case Complexity." Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 38 (1):92-118. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewaa027
Grendstad, Gunnar, William R. Shaffer, Jørn Øyrehagen Sunde, and Eric N. Waltenburg. 2020. Proactive and Powerful. Law Clerks and the Institutionalization of the Norwegian Supreme Court. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.
Grendstad, Gunnar, William R. Shaffer, and Eric N. Waltenburg. 2015. Policy Making in an Independent Judiciary. The Norwegian Supreme Court. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.
Grendstad, Gunnar, and Jon Kåre Skiple. 2021. "Tilfeldighetsprinsippet i Norges Høyesterett: Fordelingen av Saker Mellom Dommere og Fordelingen av Dommere på Avdeling. En empirisk undersøkelse." Tidsskrift for rettsvitenskap 134 (1):46-76. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-3096-2021-01-02
Hettinger, Virginia A., Stefanie A. Lindquist, and Wendy L. Martinek. 2006. Judging on a Collegial Court. Influences on Federal Appellate Decision Making. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
Hillebrecht, Courtney. 2024. "Compliance with Judicial Decisions." In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Judicial Behavior, ed. L. Epstein, G. Grendstad, U. Šadl and K. Weinshall. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192898579.013.41
Hirschl, Ran. 2011. "The Nordic Counternarrative: Democracy, Human Development, and Judicial Review." International Journal of Constitutional Law 9 (2):449–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor034
Holst, Cathrine, and Silje A. Langvatn. 2021. "Descriptive Representation of Women in International Courts." Journal of Social Philosophy 52:473-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12445
Jacobi, Tonja, Patrick Leslie, and Zoe Robinson. 2024. "Institutional Design and the Predictability of Judicial Interruptions at Oral Argument." Journal of Law and Courts https://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2023.23
Johnson, Timothy R., and Thomas K. Pryor. 2018. "Oral Arguments." In Routledge Handbook of Judicial Behavior, ed. R. M. Howard and K. A. Randazzo. London: Routledge.
Kelemen, Katalin. 2024. "Dissents and Other Separate Opinions." In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Judicial Behavior, ed. L. Epstein, G. Grendstad, U. Šadl and K. Weinshall. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192898579.013.27
Kinander, Morten. 2002. "Trenger Man Egentlig Reelle Hensyn?" Lov og Rett 41 (4):224-41. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-3061-2002-04-03
Krehbiel, Jay N. 2024. "The Form and Function of Oral Arguments in High Courts." In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Judicial Behavior, ed. L. Epstein, G. Grendstad, U. Šadl and K. Weinshall. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192898579.013.26
Lindquist, Stefanie, Wendy Martinek, and Virginia Hettinger. 2007. "Splitting the Difference: Modeling Appellate Court Decisions with Mixed Outcomes." Law & Society Review 41 (2):429–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00303.x
Maltzman, Forrest, James F. Spriggs, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 2001. Crafting Law on the Supreme Court: The Collegial Game. New York: Cambrigde University Press.
Matningsdal, Magnus. 2013. "Norges Høyesterett 200 år." Svensk Juristtidning (4):425-42
Meland, Ida Marie Støp, Welat Akman Westrheim, and Gunnar Grendstad. 2022. "Spørsmål og dialog i muntlige forhandlinger i Norges Høyesterett." Lov og Rett 61 (2):117-28. https://doi.org/10.18261/lor.61.2.5
Moyer, Laura P. 2012. "The Role of Case Complexity in Judicial Decision Making." Law & Policy 34 (3):291-312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2012.00362.x
Müller-Graff, Peter-Christian, and Ola Mestad, eds. 2014. The Rising Complexity of European Law: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag.
Nie, Mintao, Gunnar Grendstad, William R. Shaffer, and Eric N. Waltenburg. 2022. "The Impact of Female Leadership in Collegial Courts on Time to Render Merits Decisions: Evidence from the Norwegian Supreme Court." Justice System Journal 43 (3):353-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2022.2095944
Nie, Mintao, Eric N. Waltenburg, and William P. McLauchlan. 2019. "Time Chart of the Justices Revisited: An Analysis of the Influences on the Time It Takes to Compose the Majority Opinion on the U.S. Supreme Court." Justice System Journal 40 (1):54-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2019.1596044
Ostberg, Cynthia L., and Matthew E. Wetstein. 2024. "Panel Effects on Courts Around the World." In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Judicial Behavior, ed. L. Epstein, G. Grendstad, U. Šadl and K. Weinshall. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192898579.013.31
Palmer, Jan, and Saul Brenner. 1990. "Determinants of the Amount of Time Taken by the Vinson Court to Process Its Full-Opinion Cases." Journal of Supreme Court History 15 (1):142–51
Phildes, Richard. 2017. "Supranational Courts and The Law of Democracy: The European Court of Human Rights." International Dispute Settlement 9 (2):154-79. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idx007
Qvigstad, Jan Fredrik, and Tore Schei. 2018. "Criteria for 'Good' Justifications." In Working paper https://www.norges-bank.no/en/news-events/news-publications/Papers/Working-Papers/2018/62018/ (Last accessed August 7, 2024).
Rathjen, Gregory J. 1980. "Time and Dissension on the United States Supreme Court." Ohio Northern University Law Review 7:227–58
Ringsmuth, Eve M., Matthew Sag, Timothy R. Johnson, and Tonja Jacobi. 2023. "SCOTUS in the Time of COVID: The Evolution of Justice Dynamics During Oral Arguments." Law & Policy 45 (1):66-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12204
Robberstad, Anne. 2016. "Viljen til å skape lov og Grunnlov." Lov & Rett 56 (1):49-64. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-3061-2016-01-04
Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. 1998. "Determinants of Collaborative Leadership: Civic Engagement, Gender or Organizational Norms?" Political Research Quarterly 51 (4):847-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299805100401
Schei, Tore. 2015. "Norges Høyesterett ved 200-årsjubileet." In Lov, sannhet, rett. Høyesterett 200 år, ed. T. Schei, J. E. A. Skoghøy and T. M. Øie. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Skiple, Jon Kåre, Mark Jonathan McKenzie, and Henrik Litleré Bentsen. 2021. "How Docket Control Shapes Judicial Behavior: A Comparative Analysis of the Norwegian and Danish Supreme Courts." Journal of Law and Courts 9 (1):111-36. https://doi.org/10.1086/712654
Skoghøy, Jens Edvin A. 2016. "Høyesteretts rolle og arbeidsmåte." Lov & Rett 56 (5):302-28. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-3061-2016-05-04
Sorenson, Maron W. 2023. "Asking Versus Telling: The Supreme Court’s Strategic Use of Questions and Statements During Oral Arguments." Political Research Quarterly 76 (4):1559-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129231164604
Sunde, Jørn Øyrehagen. 2015. Høgsteretts Historie 1965–2015 - At dømme i sidste Instans. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
Sunde, Jørn Øyrehagen. 2017. "From Courts of Appeal to Courts of Precedent—Access to the Highest Courts in the Nordic Countries." In Supreme Courts in Transition in China and the West: Adjudication at the Service of Public Goals, ed. C. H. van Rhee and Y. Fu. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Swalve, Tilko. 2022. "Does Group Familiarity Improve Deliberations in Judicial Teams? Evidence from the German Federal Court of Justice." Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 19 (1):223–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12308
Świtała, Maciej. 2024. "How Effective Is the Judiciary? Evidence on Correlation Between Cases’ Characteristics and Probability of Appeal." Europen Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 1 (2):179-206. https://doi.org/10.62355/ejels.24862
Wiklund, Ola. 2008. "The Reception Process in Sweden and Norway." In A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the European Convention on Human Rights on National Legal Systems, ed. H. Keller and A. Stone Sweet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Øie, Toril Marie. 2018. "Høyesterett i utvikling." In Norges Høyesterett 2017. Årsmelding., ed. Norges Høyesterett. Oslo: Norges Høyesterett.
Øyen, Ørnulf. 2019. Straffeprosess. 2nd ed. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mintao Nie, Gunnar Grendstad, William R. Shaffer, Eric N. Waltenburg
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
