Back to the Future? The Evolution of European Social Citizenship through the Lens of Citations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62355/ejels.20257Keywords:
Court of Justice of the European Union, citizenship, citations, network analysis, European social citizenshipAbstract
In the aftermath of the Dano judgment, the scholarship unanimously identified a jurisprudential shift towards a more restrictive interpretation of European citizenship, leading to the refusal of social assistance. Yet, the extent to which the observed shift in the approach of the Court of Justice of the European Union (the Court) permanently redirected the trajectory of European social citizenship remains understudied. The emphasis placed on contextual causes hints at a possible return to the earlier approach if the political climate becomes more conducive to the development of European social citizenship. This article empirically revisits the Court’s citizenship jurisprudence from a novel perspective, that of citations. The research question seeks to determine if there is a fundamental shift in the reference frame of citizenship judgments and the extent to which the Court’s restrictive approach, observed in the 2010s, persists in recent judgments. All citizenship judgments delivered until October 2023 are examined by combining network and legal analysis. The findings reveal a fundamental and potentially strategic shift in the reference frame of citizenship judgments delivered from 2016 onwards compared to judgments delivered before. Crucially, despite the revival of social Europe in recent years, the Court has not returned to its pre-Dano approach.References
Blauberger, Michael, Anita Heindlmaier, Dion Kramer, Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen, Jessica Sampson Thierry, Angelika Schenk, and Benjamin Werner. 2018. ‘ECJ Judges Read the Morning Papers. Explaining the Turnaround of European Citizenship Jurisprudence’. Journal of European Public Policy 25 (10): 1422–1441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1488880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1488880
Byrne, William Hamilton, Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen, and Henrik Palmer Olsen. 2023. ‘Network Analysis and Comparative Migration Law: Examples from the European Court of Human Rights’. International Journal of Migration and Border Studies 7 (2): 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMBS.2023.128598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMBS.2023.128598
Davies, Gareth. 2018. ‘Has the Court Changed, or Have the Cases? The Deservingness of Litigants as an Element in Court of Justice Citizenship Adjudication’. Journal of European Public Policy 25 (10): 1442–1460. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1488881. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1488881
Derlén, Mattias, and Johan Lindholm. 2014. ‘Goodbye van Gend En Loos, Hello Bosman: Using Network Analysis to Measure the Importance of Individual CJEU Judgments’. European Law Journal 20 (5): 667–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12077. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12077
Dothan, Shai. 2014. Reputation and Judicial Tactics: A Theory of National and International Courts. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139381260
Dougan, Michael. 2013. ‘The Bubble That Burst: Exploring the Legitimacy of the Case Law on the Free Movement of Union Citizens’. In Judging Europe’s Judges: The Legitimacy of the Case Law of the European Court of Justice, edited by Maurice Adams, Henri de Waele, Johan Meeusen, and Gert Straetmans. Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474200257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474200257
Iliopoulou-Penot, Anastasia. 2016. ‘Deconstructing the Former Edifice of Union Citizenship? The Alimanovic Judgment’. Common Market Law Review 53 (4): 1007–1035. https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2016091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2016091
Jacob, Marc. 2014. Precedents and Case-Based Reasoning in the European Court of Justice: Unfinished Business. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107053762
Jesse, Moritz, and Daniel William Carter. 2020. ‘Life after the “Dano-Trilogy”: Legal Certainty, Choices and Limitations in EU Citizenship Case Law’. In European Citizenship under Stress, edited by Nathan Cambien, Dimitry Kochenov, and Elise Muir, 135–169. Brill | Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004433076_008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004433076_008
Kilpatrick, Claire. 2023. ‘The Roaring 20s for Social Europe. The European Pillar of Social Rights and Burgeoning EU Legislation’. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 29 (2): 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589231169664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589231169664
Komárek, Jan. 2009. ‘Precedent and Judicial Lawmaking in Supreme Courts: The Court of Justice Compared to the US Supreme Court and the French Cour de Cassation’. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 11: 399–433. https://doi.org/10.5235/152888712802730602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5235/152888712802730602
Larsson, Olof, Daniel Naurin, Mattias Derlén, and Johan Lindholm. 2017. ‘Speaking Law to Power: The Strategic Use of Precedent of the Court of Justice of the European Union’. Comparative Political Studies 50 (7): 879–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016639709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016639709
Madsen, Mikael, and Urška Šadl. 2016. ‘A “Selfie” from Luxembourg: The Court of Justice and the Fabrication of the Pre-Accession Case-Law Dossiers’. Columbia Journal of European Law 22 (2): 327.
Menéndez, Agustín José. 2010. ‘European Citizenship after Martínez Sala and Baumbast: Has European Law Become More Human but Less Social?’ In The Past and Future of EU Law: The Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty, by Luis Miguel Poiares Pessoa Maduro and Loic Azoulai. Hart Publishing.
Minderhoud, Paul, and Sandra Mantu. 2017. ‘Back to the Roots? No Access to Social Assistance for Union Citizens Who Are Economically Inactive’. In Questioning EU Citizenship : Judges and the Limits of Free Movement and Solidarity in the EU, edited by Daniel Thym, 89–109. Modern Studies in European Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
NicShuibhne, Niamh. 2012. ‘(Some of) the Kids Are All Right’. Common Market Law Review 49 (Issue 1): 349–380. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2012011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2012140
———. 2015. ‘Limits Rising, Duties Ascending: The Changing Legal Shape of Union Citizenship’. Common Market Law Review 52 (4): 889–937. https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2015074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2015074
O’Brien, Charlotte. 2017. ‘The ECJ Sacrifices EU Citizenship in Vain: Commission v. United Kingdom’. Common Market Law Review 54 (1): 209–243. https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2017007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2017007
O’Leary, Síofra. 1999. ‘Putting Flesh on the Bones of European Union Citizenship Court of Justice’. European Law Review 24: 68–79.
Panagis, Yannis, and Urška Šadl. 2015. ‘The Force of EU Case Law: A Multi-Dimensional Study of Case Citations’. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, no. 279: 71–80. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-609-5-71.
Reynolds, Stephanie. 2017. ‘(De)Constructing the Road to Brexit: Paving the Way to Further Limitations on Free Movement and Equal Treatment?’ In Questioning EU Citizenship : Judges and the Limits of Free Movement and Solidarity in the EU, edited by Daniel Thym. London: Hart Publishing.
Šadl, Urška. 2021. ‘Old Is New: The Transformative Effect of References to Settled Case Law in the Decisions of the European Court of Justice’. Common Market Law Review 58 (6): 1761–1788. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2021111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2021111
Šadl, Urška, Lucía López Zurita, and Sebastiano Piccolo. 2023. ‘Route 66: Mutations of the Internal Market Explored through the Prism of Citation Networks’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 21 (3): 826–858. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad063
Šadl, Urška, and Mikael Rask Madsen. 2016. ‘Did the Financial Crisis Change European Citizenship Law? An Analysis of Citizenship Rights Adjudication before and after the Financial Crisis’. European Law Journal 22 (1): 40–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12167
Šadl, Urška, and Henrik Palmer Olsen. 2017. ‘Can Quantitative Methods Complement Doctrinal Legal Studies? Using Citation Network and Corpus Linguistic Analysis to Understand International Courts’. Leiden Journal of International Law 30 (2): 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156517000085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156517000085
Šadl, Urška, and Suvi Sankari. 2017. ‘Why Did the Citizenship Jurisprudence Change?’ In Questioning EU Citizenship: Judges and the Limits of Free Movement and Solidarity in the EU, edited by Daniel Thym, 89–109. Modern Studies in European Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Schmidt, Susanne K. 2017. ‘Extending Citizenship Rights and Losing It All: Brexit and the Perils of “Over-Constitutionalisation”’. In Questioning EU Citizenship : Judges and the Limits of Free Movement and Solidarity in the EU. Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509914678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509914678
Shaw, Jo. 2010. ‘A View of the Citizenship Classics: Martínez Sala and Subsequent Cases on Citizenship of the Union’. In The Past and Future of EU Law: The Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty, by Luis Miguel Poiares Pessoa Maduro and Loic Azoulai. Hart Publishing.
Spaventa, Eleanor. 2017. ‘Earned Citizenship – Understanding Union Citizenship through Its Scope’. In EU Citizenship and Federalism, edited by Dimitry Kochenov, 1st ed., 204–225. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139680714.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139680714.009
Thym, Daniel. 2015. ‘The Elusive Limits of Solidarity: Residence Rights of and Social Benefits for Economically Inactive Union Citizens’. Common Market Law Review 52 (1): 17–50. https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2015002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2015002
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Eftychia Constantinou
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
