The Questions That Never Came: How National Judges Use Their Discretion in the Preliminary Ruling Procedure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62355/ejels.58229Keywords:
EU law, preliminary ruling procedure, article 267 TFEU, judicial behaviour, judicial dialogueAbstract
While domestic judges ultimately decide whether to refer questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), little is known about how the idea to refer is introduced in national litigation or about the decision (not) to refer. The preliminary ruling procedure (PRP) allows the CJEU to safeguard the uniformity of EU law, but that task can be hindered when national courts withhold questions. This article explores how often questions are sent to the CJEU, compared to the decisions not to refer, and to what extent referrals are driven by national judges acting on their own motion, compared to the parties. Despite challenges in accessing such data, an analysis of 728 referred and non-referred cases from all Swedish courts reveals that, although the PRP formally excludes party involvement, it is mostly the parties who raise the issue. However, they often struggle to have their questions referred. Importantly, 42 per cent of the questions sent came from the judges acting on their own initiative, sometimes against the parties’ wishes. Courts with a duty to refer show the highest tendency to request preliminary rulings, likely in part due to their legal obligation. These findings suggest that both judges and parties should be viewed as co-drivers of the PRP, nuancing narratives that emphasise one over the other. Nevertheless, most questions of EU law stay at the national level, adding to the large pool of questions that never reach the CJEU.References
Anderson, David, and Marie Demetriou. 2002. References to the European Court. 2nd ed. Sweet & Maxwell.
Bernitz, Ulf. 2016. Förhandsavgöranden av EU-domstolen Utvecklingen av svenska domstolars hållning och praxis 2010–2015, SIEPS 2016:9.
Bernitz, Ulf. 2018. “Preliminary Rulings to the CJEU and the Swedish Judiciary – Current Developments.” In The Court of Justice of the European Union: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Mattias Derlén and Johan Lindholm. Hart Publishing: 17–33.
Bernitz, Ulf. 2021. Förhandsavgöranden av EU-domstolen 1995–2020. SIEPS 2021:2.
Broberg, Morten and Niels Fenger. 2015. ”Förhandsavgörande från svenska domstolar – Är svenska domstolar väsentligt mindre benägna att begära förhandsavgörande än domstolar i andra medlemsstater?” Europarättslig tidskrift 4: 769–790.
Broberg, Morten, and Niels Fenger. 2021. Broberg and Fenger on Preliminary References to the European Court of Justice, 3rd ed, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198843580.001.
Burley, Anne-Marie, and Walter Mattli. 1993. “Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration.” International Organization 47 (1): 41–76.
Carrubba, Clifford and Lacey Murrah. 2005. “Legal Integration and Use of the Preliminary Ruling Process in the European Union.” International Organization 59 (2): 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050137.
Chalmers, Damian. 2000. The Much Ado about Judicial Politics in the United Kingdom: A Statistical Analysis of Reported Decisions of United Kingdom Courts Invoking EU Law 1973-1998. Jean Monnet Center for International and Regional Economic Law & Justice.
Cichowski, Rachel. 2007. The European Court and Civil Society: Litigation, Mobilization and Governance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491924
Claassen, Jesse. 2019. “Attitude or Aptitude? Explaining the Lack of Preliminary References in Dutch Competition Law Cases”. In The Eurosceptic Challenge: National Implementation and Interpretation of EU Law, edited by Clara Rauchegger and Anna W Ghavanini. Bloomsbury: 175-190. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509927685.0005.
Conant, Lisa. 2002. Justice Contained: Law and Politics in the European Union. Cornell University Press.
Craig, Paul and Gráinne de Búrca. 2024. EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 8th ed. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198915522.001.0001.
Derlén, Mattias and Johan Lindholm. 2015. ”Festina Lente – Europarättens genomslag i svensk rättspraxis 1995-2015.” Europarättslig tidskrift 1: 151–177.
Derlén, Mattias and Johan Lindholm. 2017. ”Från Champagne till Ramlösa: EU-domstolens rättspraxis i svenska underinstanser.” Europarättslig tidskrift 4: 695-716.
Dyevre, Arthur, Monika Glavina, and Angelina Atanasova. 2020. “Who refers most? Institutional incentives and judicial participation in the preliminary ruling system.” Journal of European Public Policy 27: 912–930.
Dyevre, Arthur, Monika Glavina, Michal Ovádek. 2021. “The Voices of European Law: Legislators, Judges and Law Professors.” German Law Journal 22 (6): 956–982. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.47
Dyevre, Arthur and Nicolas Lampach. 2021. “Subnational Disparities in EU Law Use: Exploring the GEOCOURT dataset.” Journal of European Public Policy 28 (4): 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1744688.
Eckstein, Harry. 1975. “Case Studies and Theory in Political Science.” In Handbook of political science, edited by Fred Greenstein and Nelson Polsby. Addison-Wesley.
Engström, Johanna. 2022. ”Unionsrättens tillämpning i svenska domstolar – en analys av mål rörande artikel 47 i EU:s stadga om de grundläggande rättigheterna och mål rörande den allmänna unionsrättsliga principen om rätten till ett effektivt rättsskydd.” Europarättslig tidskrift: 557–585.
European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). 2024. European judicial systems CEPEJ Evaluation Report. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/cepej-evaluation-report-part-1-en-/1680b272ac.
European Parliament Directorate-General for Internal Policies. 2011. Judicial Training in the European Union Member States https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2011/453198/IPOL-JURI_ET(2011)453198_EN.pdf.
Fjelstul, Joshua, Daniel Naurin, Stein Arne Brekke, and Silje Synnøve Lyder Hermansen. 2024. "The IUROPA CJEU Database Platform (v2.00.00)", in Lindholm, Johan, Daniel Naurin, Urska Sadl, Anna Wallerman Ghavanini, Stein Arne Brekke, Joshua Fjelstul, Silje Synnøve Lyder Hermansen, Olof Larsson, Andreas Moberg, Moa Näsström, Michal Ovádek, Tommaso Pavone, and Philipp Schroeder, The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) Database, IUROPA, https://www.iuropa.pol.gu.se/.
Gerring, John. 2007. “Is There a (Viable) Crucial-Case Method?” Comparative Political Studies 40 (3): 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006290784.
Glavina, Monika. 2019. “Reluctance to Participate in the Preliminary Ruling Procedure as a Challenge to EU law: A Case Study on Slovenia and Croatia.” In The Eurosceptic Challenge: National Implementation and Interpretation of EU Law, edited by Clara Rauchegger and Anna W Ghavanini. Bloomsbury: 191–212. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509927685.0005.
Glavina, Monika. 2024. “Private-Interest Actors as Catalysts for Actions under Public Law.” Erasmus Law Review 2: 86–101. https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000250.
Göransson, Frida-Louise. 2014. “Rapport suédois.” In L’obligation de renvoi préjudiciel à la Cour de Justice – Une obligation sanctionnée?, edited by Laurent Coutron. Larcier: 479–496.
Herbert, F. 1987. “Parties – Belgium.” In Article 177 EEC: Experiences and Problems, edited by Henry G Schermers. Elsevier.
Hoevenaars, Jos. 2018. A People’s Court?: Bottom-Up Approaches to Litigation Before the European Court of Justice. Eleven.
Hoevenaars, Jos. 2022. “EU Law Mobilization.” In Researching the European Court of Justice Methodological Shifts and Law's Embeddedness, edited by Mikael R Madsen, Fernanda Nicola, and Antoine Vauchez. Cambridge University Press: 82–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009049818.
Hofmann, Andreas. 2024. “Who Does and Who Does Not Engage in Strategic Litigation in European Law?” German Law Journal 25 (6): 856-872. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2024.58.
Jaremba, Urszula and Marleen Kappé. 2024. “The Unfolding Story of Judicial Dialogue in the EU: The Coercive and Persuasive Motives Behind the Participation of Belgian Highest Courts in the Preliminary Ruling Procedure.” German Law Journal 25 (5): 690–706. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2024.9.
Johnsson, Emil. 2024. “Ordinarie domares arbetsförhållanden vid Sveriges tingsrätten och förvaltningsrätten En rapport till Sveriges Domareförbund baserad på resultat från en enkätstudie om underrättsdomares arbetsförhållanden”, Accessed December 5, 2025. https://domareforbundet.se/files/articles/198/rapport-enkatundersokning.pdf.
Kelemen, Daniel R. 2011. Eurolegalism: The Transformation of Law and Regulation in the European Union. Harvard University Press.
Kommerskollegium. 2005. “Europa – ja, men när?” – uppfattningen om EU:s inre marknad hos svenska domstolar.
Krommendijk, Jasper. 2019. “Why do lower courts refer in the absence of a legal obligation? Irish eagerness and Dutch disinclination.” Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative law 26 (6): 770–791. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X19871024.
Krommendijk, Jasper. 2020. “It Takes Two to Tango: The Preliminary Reference Dance Between the Court of Justice of the European Union and National Courts.” European Papers 5 (2): 745–754
Krommendijk, Jasper. 2021. National Courts and Preliminary References to the Court of Justice, Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800374171.
Lacchi, Clelia. 2020. Preliminary References to the Court of Justice of the European Union and Effective Judicial Protection. Larcier.
Lane, Robert. 2024. “Article 234: A Few Rough Edges Still”. In A True European: Essays for Judge David Edward, edited by Mark Hoskins and William Robinson. Bloomsbury.
Lecourt, Robert. 1976. l’Europe des juges. Bruylant.
Leijon, Karin. 2018. National Courts as Gatekeepers in European Integration: Examining the Choices National Courts Make in the Preliminary Ruling Procedure. Uppsala University.
Leijon, Karin, and Monika Glavina. 2022. ”Why Passive? Exploring National Judges’ Motives for not Requesting Preliminary Rulings.” Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 29 (2): 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X221091768.
Lester, A. 1987. “Parties – United Kingdom”. In Article 177 EEC: Experiences and Problems, edited by Henry G Schermers. Elsevier.
Levy, Jack. 2007. “Qualitative methods in international relations”. In Evaluating methodology in international studies, edited by FP Harvey and M Brecher. University of Michigan Press: 196–214. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.8887.
Mattli, Walter, and Anne-Marie Slaughter. 1998. “Revisiting the European Court of Justice”, International Organization 52 (1): 177–209. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550590.
Maunsbach, Lotta. 2022. “Civil Procedure”. In Swedish Legal System, edited by Michael Bogdan and Christoffer Wong. Norstedts Juridik: 464–489
Matz, Henrik. 2010. Begreppet domstol i EU-rätten: En studie av domstolsbegreppet i bestämmelerna om förhandsavgörande. Iustus.
Micklitz, Hans W. 2005. The Politics of Judicial Co-operation in the EU: Sunday Trading, Equal Treatment and Good Faith. Cambridge University Press.
Nowak, Tobias, Fabian Amtenbrink, Marc Hertogh and Mark Wissink. 2011. National Judges as European Union Judges: Knowledge, Experiences and Attitudes of Lower Court Judges in Germany and the Netherlands. Erasmus School of Law.
Passalacqua, Virginia. 2020. Legal Mobilization and the Judicial Construction of EU Migration Law. European University Institute. https://doi.org/10.2870/405881.
Passalacqua, Virginia. 2021. “Legal Mobilization Via Preliminary Reference: Insights from the Case of Migrant Rights.” Common Market Law Review 58 (3): 751–776. https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2021049.
Passalacqua, Virginia. 2025. Legal Mobilization for Migrant Rights: Opportunities and Barriers at the European Court of Justice. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198943006.001.0001.
Pavone, Tommaso. 2018. “Revisiting Judicial Empowerment in the European Union – Limits of Empowerment, Logics of Resistance.” Journal of Law and Courts 6 (2): 303–331,
Pavone, Tommaso. 2022. The Ghostwriters – Lawyers and the Politics behind the Judicial Construction of Europe. Cambridge University Press.
Pertek, Jacques. 2015. “L’avocat et le renvoi préjudiciel: sa place et son rôle devant les juridictions nationales et la Cour de Justice.” In L’identité du droit de l’Union européenne: mélanges en l’honneur de Claude Blumann, edited by Bertrand Brunessen et al. Larcier.
Schmauch, Magnus. 2023. ”Extraordinära rättsmedel i unionsrättslig belysning.” Svensk Juristtidning: 652–666.
Skouris, Vassilios. 2015. “Préface“, In Renvoi Préjudiciel et Marge d’Appréciation du Juge National, edited by Eleftheria Neframi. Larcier: 17–21.
Tansey, Oisín. 2007. “Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A Case for Non-probability Sampling” Political Science and Politics.” Political Science & Politics 40 (4): 765–772. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096507071211.
Tridimas, George, and Takis Tridimas. 2004. “National courts and the European Court of Justice: A public choice analysis of the preliminary reference procedure.” International Review of Law and Economics 24 (2): 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2004.08.003.
Verburg, Joep. 1997. “Introduction“. In European Ambitions of the National Judiciary, edited by RHM Jansen et al. Kluwer.
Vink, Maarten, Monica Claes, and Christine Arnold. 2009. Explaining the Use of Preliminary References by Domestic Courts in EU Member States: A Mixed-Method Comparative Analysis, 11th Biennial Conference of the European Union Studies Association.
Weiler, Joseph H.H. 1991. “The transformation of Europe.” Yale Law Journal 100 (8): 2403–2483. https://doi.org/10.2307/796898.
Wind, Marlene. 2010. “The Nordics, the EU and the Reluctance Towards National Judicial Review.” Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (4): 1039–1063. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02085.x.
Wind, Marlene. 2017. “The Transformation of Europe and of Selective Exit Twenty-Five Years After.” In The Transformation of Europe Twenty-Five Years On, edited by Miguel Poiares Maduro and Marlene Wind. Cambridge University Press: 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316662465.
Zetterquist, Ola. 2008. “Rättens rike och EG-rätten – Envälde eller dubbelmonarki.” Europarättslig tidskrift: 93–108.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Isak Nilsson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
