Academic social networks and self-branding among library and information science academics in the European Union
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47989/ir30341815Keywords:
academic social network, scholarly reputation, self-branding, Library and Information Science, academic activity, digital platformsAbstract
Introduction. This research analyses the perception and habits about digital platforms and self-branding among European scholars in the library and information science area.
Method. A survey using a questionnaire was administered online to 1,562 scholars working in public universities in the European Union. A response of 201 respondents was obtained.
Analysis. The collected data by Google Forms were processed using a specific spreadsheet in Excel and analysed using the software SPSS Statistics. Independent-samples t (two-tailed) and Chi-squared tests were used to check for significant differences between variables.
Results. Most participants think that digital platforms are useful for increasing the visibility of their work and managing their reputation, particularly ResearchGate and Google Scholar, although there is limited information in their profiles about their academic activity. The responses show a positive attitude towards personal branding, but most do not adopt it mainly due to not having enough time. Scholars who use personal branding are more committed to the use of personal websites and disseminating their academic achievements.
Conclusion. These findings support the need for more in-depth investigations related to the strategies of academics engaging in personal branding, as well as measuring the impact it has on their academic and professional careers.
References
Al-Daihani, S., Al-Qallaf, J., & AlSaheeb, S. (2018). Use of social media by social science academics for scholarly communication. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 67(6/7), 412-424. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-11-2017-0091
Ali, M.Y., & Richardson, J. (2019). Google Scholar citation metrics of Pakistani LIS scholars: an overview. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 68(4/5), 392-412. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-032018-0025
Baro, E. E., Tralagba, E. C., & Ebiagbe, E. J. (2018). Knowledge and use of self-archiving options among academic librarians working in universities in Africa. Information and Learning Science, 119(3/4), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-01-2018-0003
Bhardwaj, R. K. (2017). Academic social networking sites: comparative analysis of ResearchGate, Academia.edu, Mendeley and Zotero. Information and Learning Science, 118(5/6), 298–316. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-03-2017-0012
Camilleri, M. A. (2017). Utilising content marketing metrics and social networks for academic visibility: content marketing for academic impact. In Cabrera, M., & Lloret, N. (Eds.), Digital Tools for Academic Branding and Self-Promotion (pp.109–126). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0917-2.ch008
Copiello, S., & Bonifaci, P. (2018). A few remarks on ResearchGate score and academic reputation. Scientometrics, 114(1), 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2582-9
D’Alessandro, S., Miles, M., Martínez-López, F.J., Anaya-Sánchez, R., Esteban-Millat, I., & Torrez-Meruvia, H. (2020). Promote or perish? A brief note on academic social networking sites and academic reputation. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(5/6), 405–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1697104
Dewett, T., & Denisi, A.S. (2004). Exploring scholarly reputation: it’s more than just productivity. Scientometrics, 60(2), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027796.55585.61
Donelan, H. (2016). Social media for professional development and networking opportunities in academia. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(5), 706-729. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2015.1014321
Duffy, B.E., & Pooley, J.D. (2017). Facebook for Academics: the convergence of self-branding and social media logic on Academia.edu. Social Media + Society, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117696523
European Commission (2020). Progress on Open Science: towards a shared research knowledge system. https://doi.org/10.2777/00139
Francke, H. (2019). The academic web profile as a genre of self-making. Online Information Review, 43(5), 760–774. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-12-2017-0347
Francke, H., & Hammarfelt, B. (2022). Competitive exposure and existential recognition: visibility and legitimacy on academic social networking sites. Research Evaluation, 31(4), 429–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvab043
Hailu, M., & Wu, J. (2021). The use of academic social networking sites in scholarly communication: scoping review. Data and Information Management, 5(2), 277-298. https://doi.org/10.2478/dim-2020-0050
Herman, E. (2018). Scholarly reputation. FEMS microbiology letters, 365(18). https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fny200
Herman, E., & Nicholas, D. (2019). Scholarly reputation building in the digital age: an activity-specific approach. Review article. El profesional de la información, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.ene.02
Jamali, H., Nicholas, D., & Herman, E. (2016). Scholarly reputation in the digital age and the role of emerging platforms and mechanisms. Research Evaluation, 25(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv032
IFLA & Schniederjürgen, A. (2007). World guide to library, archive and information science education. K. G. Saur. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783598440298
iSchools (n.d.). iSchools members. https://www.ischools.org/members. (Archived by the Internet Archive at https://web.archive.org/web/20240604092041/https://www.ischools.org/members)
Jordan, K., & Weller, M. (2018). Communication, collaboration and identity: factor analysis of academics’ perceptions of online networking. Research in Learning Technology, 26, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2013
Jordan, K. (2014). Academics and their online networks: exploring the role of academic social networking sites. First Monday, 19(11). http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i11.4937
Kjellberg, S., Haider, J., & Sundin, O. (2016). Researchers' use of social network sites: a scoping review. Library and Information Science Research, 38, 224–234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2016.08.008
Kjellberg, S., & Jutta, H. (2019). Researchers’ online visibility: tensions of visibility, trust and reputation. Online Information Review, 43(3), 426-439. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-07-2017-0211
Liu, X., Yu, W., & Zhao, Z. (2020). How researchers view altmetrics: an investigation of ISSI participants. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 72(3), 361-378. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-07-2019-0165
Lohia, P., & Prakash, H. (2023). Research online visibility of LIS faculties at Central Universities in North India. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 42(6), 414-419. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.42.6.18467
Mason, S. (2020). Adoption and usage of Academic Social Networks: a Japan case study. Scientometrics, 122, 1751–1767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03345-4corvell
Meishar-Tal, H., & Pieterse, E. (2017). Why do academics use Academic Social Networking Sites? International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(1), 1–22, https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2643
Muscanell, N., & Utz, S. (2017). Social networking for scientists: an analysis on how and why academics use ResearchGate. Online Information Review, 41(5), 744-759. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-07-2016-0185
Nentwich, M. (2010). Web 2.0 and academia. In Karner, S., & Getzinger, G. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th IAS-STS Annual Conference on Critical Issues in Science and Technology Studies (pp.66-78). IFZ Eigenverlag Graz.
Nicholas, D., Jamali, H.R., Herman, E., Watkinson, A., Abrizah, A., Rodríguez‐Bravo, B., Boukacem‐Zeghmouri, C., Xu, J., Świgoń, M., & Polezhaeva, T. (2020a). A global questionnaire survey of the scholarly communication attitudes and behaviours of early career researchers. Learned Publishing, 33, 198-211. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1286
Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A., Abrizah, A., Rodríguez‐Bravo, B., Boukacem‐Zeghmouri, C., Xu, J., Świgoń, M., & Herman, E. (2020b). Does the scholarly communication system satisfy the beliefs and aspirations of new researchers? Summarizing the Harbingers research. Learned Publishing, 33, 132-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1284
Nicholas, D., Herman, E., Jamali, H.R., Rodríguez-Bravo, B., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Dobrowolski, T., & Pouchot, S. (2015). New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation. Learned Publishing, 28(3), 169-183. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150303
Nicholas, D., Herman, E., Xu, J., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Abdullah, A., Watkinson, A., Świgoń, M., & Rodríguez-Bravo, B. (2018). Early career researchers' quest for reputation in the digital age. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 49(4), 375-396. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.49.4.01
Nicholas, D., Rodríguez-Bravo, B., Watkinson, A., Boukacem- Zeghmouri, Ch., Herman, E., Xu, J., Abrizah, A., & Świgoń, M. (2017). Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices. Learned publishing, 30(3), 205-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1102
Nijjer, S., & Raj, S. (2020). Social media use in academia: towards topology development and investigation of dominant use motive. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 18(2), 255-280. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-08-2019-0093
Ortega, J.L. (2015). Relationship between altmetrics and bibliometric indicators across academic sites: the case of CSIC’s members. Journal of Infometrics, 9, 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.11.004
Radford, M.L., Kitzie, V., Mikitish, S., Floegel, D., Radford, G.P., & Connaway, L.S. (2020). People are reading your work: scholarly identity and Social Networking Sites. Journal of Documentation, 76(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-04-2019-0074
Radford, M.L., Kitzie, V., Mikitish, S., Floegel, D., Radford, G.P., & Connaway, L.S. (2018). Investigating practices for building an ethical and sustainable scholarly identity with online platforms and social networking sites. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 55(1), 404–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2018.14505501044
Scheidt, S., Gelhard, C., & Henseler, J. (2020). Old Practice, but young research field: a systematic bibliographic review of personal branding. Front Psychol, 11(1809), https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01809
Shehata, A.M.K. (2019). Exploring the scholarly communication styles of Arab social science and humanities scholars. Learned Publishing, 32, 304-311. https://doi-org.bucm.idm.oclc.org/10.1002/leap.1253
Siso-Calvo, B., & Arquero-Avilés, R. (2020). Plataformas digitales y reputación académica: análisis del área de Biblioteconomía y Documentación en España [Digital platforms and academic reputation: exploring the Library and Information Science area in Spain]. Ibersid, 14(1), 69-77. https://www.ibersid.eu/ojs/index.php/ibersid/article/view/4692. (Archived by the Internet Archive at https://archive.org/details/ibersid-articulo)
Stephen, G., & Pramanathan, U. (2020). Awareness and use of academic social networking sites among library and information science professionals in North Eastern Region in India. Library Philosophy and Practice. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/3891. (Archived by the Internet Archive at https://web.archive.org/web/20240128181851/https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7223&context=libphilprac)
Sugimoto, C.R., Work, S., Larivière, V., & Haustein, S. (2017). Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: a review of the literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2037–2062. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23833
Wiechetek, Ł., & Pastuszak, Z. (2022). Academic social networks metrics: an effective indicator for university performance? Scientometrics, 127(3), 1381–1401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04258-6
Wilson, T. (2013). World List of schools and departments of information science, information management and related disciplines. American Library Association. https://www.ala.org/educationcareers/employment/foreigncredentialing/worldlist. (Archived by the Internet Archive at https://web.archive.org/web/20240604094701/https://www.ala.org/educationcareers/employment/foreigncredentialing/worldlist)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Brenda Siso-Calvo, Rosario Arquero-Avilés, Gonzalo Marco-Cuenca, Chiara Faggiolani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
