Distrusting Consensus: How a Uniform Corona Pandemic Narrative Fostered Suspicion and Conspiracy Theories
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v5i3.143Keywords:
Corona, Pandemic, Consensus, Distrust, Conspiracy Theories, Orthodoxy, Science Communication, Uncertainty, Diversity, Infodemic, DeliberationAbstract
Although the institutional model of science communication operated well during the corona-pandemic, and relevant public institutions (media, science, politics) garnered higher levels of trust following “rally-around-the-flag” dynamics, other people would develop distrusts towards those institutions and the emerging orthodox corona narrative. Their ideas are often framed as conspiracy theories, and today’s globalized media eco-system enables their proliferation. This looming “infodemic” became a prime object of concern. In this article I agnostically study those distrusts from a cultural sociological perspective to better understand how and why people (came to) disbelieve official knowledge and their producers. To do so, I draw on my ethnographic fieldwork in the off- and online worlds of people labeled as conspiracy theorists in the Netherlands, which includes the media they consume, share and produce. Based on an inductive analysis of people’s own sense-making, I present three dominant reasons: media’s panicky narrative of fear and mayhem; governments sole focus on lockdowns and vaccines; and the exclusion of heterodox scientific perspectives in the public sphere. Each of these reasons problematize a perceived orthodoxy in media, politics and science, and this uniformity bred suspicion about possible conspiracies between these public institutions. Too much consensus gets distrusted. While we can discard those ideas as irrational conspiracy theories, I conclude that these findings have important implications for the way we deal with and communicate about complex societal problems. Next to keeping things simple and clear, as crisis/risk/science communication holds, we need to allow for uncertainty, critique and epistemic diversity as well.
References
Angeli, F., Camporesi, S., & Dal Fabbro, G. (2021). The COVID-19 wicked problem in public health ethics: conflicting evidence, or incommensurable values? Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1-8.
Athique, A. (2020). <? covid19?> Extraordinary issue: Coronavirus, crisis and communication. Media International Australia, 177(1), 3-11.
Baker, S. A., Wade, M., & Walsh, M. J. (2020). <? covid19?> The challenges of responding to misinformation during a pandemic: Content moderation and the limitations of the concept of harm. Media International Australia, 177(1), 103-107.
Bal, R., de Graaff, B., van de Bovenkamp, H., & Wallenburg, I. (2020). Practicing Corona–Towards a research agenda of health policies. Health Policy, 124(7), 671-673.
Ball, P., & Maxmen, A. (2020). The epic battle against coronavirus misinformation and conspiracy theories. Nature, 581(7809), 371-375.
Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press.
Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European journal of communication, 33(2), 122-139.
Birchall, C., & Knight, P. (2023). Conspiracy Theories in the Time of Covid-19. London: Routledge.
Bory, P., Crabu, S., Morsello, B., Tomasi, M., & Tosoni, S. (2022). Rethinking the nexus between science, politics and society in the age of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Tecnoscienza: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 12(2), 141-188.
Boullier, H., Kotras, B., & Siles, I. (2021). Uncertain Knowledge. Studying “Truth” and “Conspiracies” in the Digital Age. RESET. Recherches en sciences sociales sur Internet, (10).
Bromme, R., Mede, N. G., Thomm, E., Kremer, B., & Ziegler, R. (2022). An anchor in troubled times: Trust in science before and within the COVID-19 pandemic. PloS one, 17(2), e0262823.
Bjorkdahl, K., & Carlsen, B. (2019). Pandemics, publics and politics. Springer.
Bradshaw, A. S. (2022). # DoctorsSpeakUp: Exploration of Hashtag Hijacking by Anti-Vaccine Advocates and the Influence of Scientific Counterpublics on Twitter. Health Communication, 1-11.
Butter, M., & Knight, P. (Eds.). (2020). Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories. London: Routledge.
Caduff, C. (2020). What went wrong: Corona and the world after the full stop. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 34(4), 467-487.
Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W., Galeazzi, A., Valensise, C. M., Brugnoli, E., Schmidt, A. L., ... & Scala, A. (2020). The COVID-19 social media infodemic. Nature, 10(1), 1-10.
Chadwick A (2017) The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chapman, C. M., & Miller, D. S. (2020). From metaphor to militarized response: the social implications of “we are at war with COVID-19”–crisis, disasters, and pandemics yet to come. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
Crabu, S., Giardullo, P., Sciandra, A., & Neresini, F. (2021). Politics overwhelms science in the Covid-19 pandemic: Evidence from the whole coverage of the Italian quality newspapers. PLoS One, 16(5), e0252034.
Crabu, S., Picardi, I., & Turrini, V. (2022). Refused-knowledge during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mobilising Experiential Expertise for Care and Well-being. Science as Culture, 1-24.
Curato, N., Dryzek, J. S., Ercan, S. A., Hendriks, C. M., & Niemeyer, S. (2017). Twelve key findings in deliberative democracy research. Daedalus, 146(3), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00444
Dahlgren, P. (2018). Media, knowledge and trust: The deepening epistemic crisis of democracy. Javnost-The Public, 25(1-2), 20-27.
Davies, S. R., Halpern, M., Horst, M., Kirby, D. S., & Lewenstein, B. (2019). Science stories as culture: experience, identity, narrative and emotion in public communication of science. Journal of Science Communication, 18(5),
Dentith, M.R. (Ed.) (2018). Taking conspiracy theories seriously. Rowman & Littlefield.
Devine, D., Gaskell, J., Jennings, W., & Stoker, G. (2021). Trust and the coronavirus pandemic: What are the consequences of and for trust? An early review of the literature. Political Studies Review, 19(2), 274-285.
Dodsworth, L. (2021). A state of fear: How the UK government weaponised fear during the Covid-19 pandemic. London: Pinter & Martin.
Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 40, 3-35.
Douglas, K. M. (2021). COVID-19 conspiracy theories. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(2), 270-275.
Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1983). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. University of California Press.
Drazkiewicz , E. (2022). Study conspiracy theories with compassion. Nature, 603(7903), 765-765.
Drazkiewicz, E., & Harambam, J. (2021). What should academics do about conspiracy theories? Moving beyond debunking to better deal with conspiratorial movements, misinformation and post-truth. Journal for Cultural Research, 25(1), 1-11.
Enders, A. M., Uscinski, J. E., Klofstad, C., & Stoler, J. (2020). The different forms of COVID-19 misinformation and their consequences. The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review.
Falzon, M. A. (Ed.). (2016). Multi-sited ethnography: Theory, praxis and locality in contemporary research. Routledge.
Finset, A., Bosworth, H., Butow, P., Gulbrandsen, P., Hulsman, R. L., Pieterse, A. H., ... & van Weert, J. (2020). Effective health communication–a key factor in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient education and counseling, 103(5), 873.
Fischer, F. (2019). Knowledge politics and post-truth in climate denial: On the social construction of alternative facts. Critical Policy Studies, 13(2), 133–152.
Friedman, S. M., Dunwoody, S., & Rogers, C. L. (2012). Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science. London: Routledge.
Garrett, L. (2020). COVID-19: the medium is the message. The lancet, 395(10228), 942-943.
Graber, D. A., & Smith, J. M. (2005). Political communication faces the 21st century. Journal of communication, 55(3), 479-507.
Green, T. (2021). The Covid Consensus: The New Politics of Global Inequality. Oxford University Press.
Hagen, K. (2022) Conspiracy Theories and the Failure of Intellectual Critique. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Harris, J. (2020). Science and democracy reconsidered. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 6, 102–110.
Heath, R. L., Lee, J., & Ni, L. (2009). Crisis and risk approaches to emergency management planning and communication: The role of similarity and sensitivity. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(2), 123-141.
Harambam, J. (2020a). Contemporary conspiracy culture: Truth and knowledge in an era of epistemic instability. London: Routledge.
Harambam, J. (2020b). The Corona Truth Wars: Where Have All the STS’ers Gone When We Need Them Most?. Science & Technology Studies, 33(4), 60-67.
Harambam, J. (2021a). Against modernist illusions: why we need more democratic and constructivist alternatives to debunking conspiracy theories. Journal for Cultural Research, 25(1), 104-122.
Harambam, J. (2021b). Conspiracy theories: Misinformed publics or wittingly believing false information?. In The Routledge Companion to Media Disinformation and Populism (pp. 302-311). Routledge.
Harambam, J. (2022) The Proliferation of Alternative Media: How Corona Conspiracy Theories in The Netherlands Fostered New Social Movements, in: Knight P & Butter M, Corona Conspiracy Theories, London: Routledge.
Harambam, J., Grusauskaite, K., & de Wildt, L. (2022). Poly-truth, or the limits of pluralism: Popular debates on conspiracy theories in a post-truth era. Public Understanding of Science, 09636625221092145.
Horton, R. (2021). The COVID-19 catastrophe: What's gone wrong and how to stop it happening again. John Wiley & Sons.
Hyland-Wood, B., Gardner, J., Leask, J., & Ecker, U. K. (2021). Toward effective government communication strategies in the era of COVID-19. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1-11.
Joffe, A. R. (2021). COVID-19: rethinking the lockdown groupthink. Frontiers in public health, 9, 98.
Kahan, D. (2010). Fixing the communications failure. Nature, 463(7279), 296-297.
Kinsella, C. M., Santos, P. D., Postigo-Hidalgo, I., Folgueiras-González, A., Passchier, T. C., Szillat, K. P., ... & Martí-Carreras, J. (2020). Preparedness needs research: How fundamental science and international collaboration accelerated the response to COVID-19. PLoS Pathogens, 16(10), e1008902.
Kim, D. K. D., & Kreps, G. L. (2020). An analysis of government communication in the United States during the COVID?19 pandemic: recommendations for effective government health risk communication. World Medical & Health Policy, 12(4), 398-412.
Klein, N. (2020) The Great Reset Conspiracy Smoothie. The Intercept, Dec 8: https://theintercept.com/2020/12/08/great-reset-conspiracy/
Kupper, F. (2020) The uncertainty of it all. Spokes #66, https://www.ecsite.eu/activities-and-services/news-and-publications/digital-spokes/issue-66#section=section-indepth&href=/feature/depth/uncertainty-it-all
Kwok, H., Singh, P., & Heimans, S. (2021). The regime of ‘post-truth’: COVID-19 and the politics of knowledge. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1-15.
Larson, H. J. (2020). Blocking information on COVID-19 can fuel the spread of misinformation. Nature, 580(7803), 306-307.
Lim, M. (2022). # Coronaconspiracy: Algorithms, Users, and Conspiracy Theories in Social Media. Media/Culture Journal, 25(1).
Llewellyn, S. (2020). Covid-19: how to be careful with trust and expertise on social media. BMJ, 368.
Lohse, S., & Bschir, K. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: a case for epistemic pluralism in public health policy. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 42(4), 1-5.
Martin, B. (2021). Covid Information Struggles. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 10(6), 16-26.
Marwick, A. E., & Lewis, R. (2017). Media manipulation and disinformation online. Data & Society Research Institute Report
Moradian, Negar, Hans D. Ochs, Constantine Sedikies, Michael R. Hamblin, Carlos A. Camargo, J. Alfredo Martinez, Jacob D. Biamonte et al. "The urgent need for integrated science to fight COVID-19 pandemic and beyond." Journal of translational medicine 18, no. 1 (2020): 1-7.
Morley, D. (1993). Active audience theory: pendulums and pitfalls. Journal of communication, 43(4), 13-19.
Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. Public Affairs.
Morsello, B., & Giardullo, P. (2023). Free choice in the making: Vaccine-related activism as an alternative form of citizenship during the Covid-19 pandemic. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 15(3), 697-719.
Nielsen, R. K., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., & Simon, F. (2020). Communications in the Coronavirus Crisis: Lessons for the Second Wave. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
Niemiec, E. (2020). COVID?19 and misinformation: Is censorship of social media a remedy to the spread of medical misinformation?. EMBO reports, 21(11), e51420.
Noppari, E., Hiltunen, I., & Ahva, L. (2019). User profiles for populist counter-media websites in Finland. Journal of Alternative & Community Media, 4(1), 23-37.
Oreskes, N., & Conway, E.M. (2011). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.
Pomerantsev, P. (2020). This is Not Propaganda: Adventures in the War Against Reality. London: Faber & Faber.
Post, S., Bienzeisler, N., & Lohöfener, M. (2021). A desire for authoritative science? How citizens’ informational needs and epistemic beliefs shaped their views of science, news, and policymaking in the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Understanding of Science, 30(5), 496-514.
Pyrhönen, N., & Bauvois, G. (2020). Conspiracies beyond fake news. Produsing reinformation on presidential elections in the transnational hybrid media system. Sociological Inquiry, 90(4), 705-731.
Rakopoulos, T. (2022) Of Fascists and Dreamers. Conspiracy Theory and Anthropology, Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale, 30 (1), 45–62.
Rauch, J. (2020). Resisting the News: Engaged Audiences, Alternative Media, and Popular Critique of Journalism. Routledge.
Roedema, T., Rerimassie, V., Broerse, J. E. W., & Kupper, J. F. H. (2022). Towards the reflective science communication practitioner. Journal of Science Communication, 21(4), A02.
Romer, D., & Jamieson, K. H. (2020). Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the US. Social science & medicine, 263, 113356.
Roozenbeek, J., Schneider, C. R., Dryhurst, S., Kerr, J., Freeman, A. L., Recchia, G., ... & Van Der Linden, S. (2020). Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world. Royal Society open science, 7(10), 201199.
Siegrist, M., Earle, T. C., & Gutscher, H. (Eds.). (2010). Trust in risk management: Uncertainty and scepticism in the public mind. Earthscan.
Siegrist, M., & Zingg, A. (2014). The role of public trust during pandemics: Implications for Crisis Communication. European Psychologist, 19(1): 23-32
Shir-Raz, Y., Elisha, E., Martin, B., Ronel, N., & Guetzkow, J. (2022). Censorship and Suppression of Covid-19 Heterodoxy: Tactics and Counter-Tactics. Minerva, 1-27.
Simon, F.M., & Camargo, C.Q. (2021). Autopsy of a metaphor: The origins, use and blind spots of the ‘infodemic’. New Media & Society, 14614448211031908.
Starbird, K. (2017). Examining the alternative media ecosystem through the production of alternative narratives of mass shooting events on Twitter. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 11: 1, pp. 230-239.
Starbird, K., Arif, A., & Wilson, T. (2019). Disinformation as collaborative work: Surfacing the participatory nature of strategic information operations. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1-26.
Sobo, E. J., & Dr??kiewicz, E. (2021). Rights, responsibilities, and revelations: Covid-19 conspiracy theories and the state. In: Manderson, L., Burke, N. J., & Wahlberg, A. (2021) (eds) Viral Loads: Anthropologies of urgency in the time of COVID-19. London: UCL Press.
Stein, R.A., Ometa, O., Shetty, S.P., Katz, A., Popitiu, M.I., & Brotherton, R. (2021). Conspiracy theories in the era of COVID?19: A tale of two pandemics. International journal of clinical practice, 75(2).
Tagliacozzo, S., Albrecht, F., & Ganapati, N.E. (2021). International perspectives on COVID-19 communication ecologies: public health agencies’ online communication in Italy, Sweden, and the United States. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(7), 934-955.
Thacker, P.D. (2021). The covid-19 lab leak hypothesis: did the media fall victim to a misinformation campaign? The British Medical Journal, BMJ, 374.
Toivanen, P., Nelimarkka, M., & Valaskivi, K. (2022). Remediation in the hybrid media environment: Understanding countermedia in context. New media & society, 24(9), 2127-2152.
Tosoni, S (2021) Misinformation, Social Media and the Pandemic Crisis: Challenging the Return to a Powerful Media Effects Paradigm, Tecnoscienza, 2021(2), 174-191.
Tumber, H., & Waisbord, S. (Eds.). (2021). The Routledge companion to media disinformation and populism. Routledge.
Uscinski, J.E. (2018). Conspiracy theories and the people who believe them. Oxford University Press, USA.
Uscinski, J.E., Enders, A. M., Klofstad, C., Seelig, M., Funchion, J., Everett, C., ... & Murthi, M. (2020). Why do people believe COVID-19 conspiracy theories?. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1(3).
Van Dijck, J., & Alinejad, D. (2020). Social media and trust in scientific expertise: Debating the Covid-19 pandemic in the Netherlands. Social Media+ Society, 6(4), 2056305120981057.
Valaskivi, K., & Robertson, D. G. (2022). Introduction: epistemic contestations in the hybrid media environment. Popular Communication, 1-9.
De Waal, A. (2021). New Pandemics, Old Politics: Two Hundred Years of War on Disease and Its Alternatives. John Wiley & Sons.
Wagner, M.C., & Boczkowski, P.J. (2019). The reception of fake news: The interpretations and practices that shape the consumption of perceived misinformation. Digital Journalism, 7(7), 870-885.
Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2020). An emotional turn in journalism studies?. Digital Journalism, 8(2), 175-194.
Weible, C.M., Nohrstedt, D., Cairney, P., Carter, D.P., Crow, D.A., Durnová, A.P., ... & Stone, D. (2020). COVID-19 and the policy sciences: initial reactions and perspectives. Policy sciences, 53(2), 225-241.
Zarocostas, J. (2020). How to fight an infodemic. The Lancet, 395(10225), 676.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
