In Need of Development, Learning and Research? : On the Possibilities of a Common Point of Departure for Digital and Educational Development

Authors

  • Jörgen From Umeå University, Sweden
  • Fanny Pettersson Umeå University, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v4i2.110

Keywords:

digitalization, digital technologies, organization, school leadership, school development

Abstract

A growing body of initiatives aims to connect school improvement with external actors, such as universities, by means of networks and collaborative partnerships of different kinds. Simultaneously, many schools have difficulties in assessing or predicting their needs associated with the digitalization of a specific local school practice given their lack of existing tools to articulate those needs. This has made it difficult to study digitalization in a complementary and symmetrical way between academia and practice. In this study, we used a quantitative instrument to generate findings and development needs relevant to both research and school development. The instrument, which we distributed to all school leaders in one municipality, measures perceptions of three overall areas: (a) levels of digitalization, (b) organizational digital maturity, and (c) notions of leadership. The data shows, for example, that digitalization, in this municipality, was a concern or issue on an individual level. Achieving a more complex view of digitalization as school development—a collegial approach and mindset together with leadership and organization that focuses on strategy and common goals—appears to be a high priority for research and practice. To conclude, the results generated from the instrument used in this study can contribute to a shared understanding of the findings and the needs relevant to both research and school development.

References

Adolfsson, C. H., & Alvunger, D. (2017). The nested systems of local school development: Understanding improved interaction and capacities in the different sub-systems of schools. Improving Schools, 20(3) 195–208. https://journals.sagepub.com doi/full/10.1177/1365480217710874

Ainscow, M. (2012). Moving knowledge around: Strategies for fostering equity within educational systems. Journal of Educational Change, 13(3), 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-012-9182-5

Avidov-Ungar, O., Shamir-Inbal, T., & Blau, I. (2020). Typology of digital leadership roles tasked with integrating new technologies into teaching: Insights from metaphor. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1809035

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps of an ecology of mind. The University of Chicago Press.

Bergström, P. (2019). Illustrating and analysing power and control relations in Finnish one-to-one computing classrooms: Teacher practices in Grades 7–9. Tidsskriftet Digital Kompetanse, 14(3–4), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2019-03-04-03

Blau, I., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2017). Digital competences and long-term ICT integration in school culture: The perspective of elementary school leaders. Education and Information Technologies, 22(3), 769–787. DOI:10.1007/s10639-015-9456-7

Chapman, C., Chestnutt, H., Friel, N., Hall, S., & Lowden, K. (2016), Professional capital and collaborative inquiry networks for educational equity and improvement? Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 1(3), 178–197. doi: 10.1108/JPCC-03-2016-0007

Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863

Day, C., & Smethem, L. (2010). Partnerships between schools and higher education. In N. Verloop (Ed.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 757–763). Elsevier.

Dexter, S. (2018). The role of leadership for information technology in education: Systems of practices. In Second handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 483–498). Publisher.

Dinh, J., Lord, R., Garnder, W., Meuser, J., Liden, R. C., & Hu, J. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 36–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.005

Engeström, Y. (2011). From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 598–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311419252

Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

From, J., Pettersson, F., & Pettersson, G. (2020). Fjärrundervisning—en central del i skolans digitalisering. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 25(2–3), 69–91. DOI: 10.15626/pfs25.0203.04

Gu, L. (2017). Using school websites for home: School communication and parental involvement? Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 3(2), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2017.1338498

Haßler, B., Major, L., & Hennessy, S. (2016). Tablet use in schools: A critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12123

Håkansson Lindqvist, M., & Pettersson, F. (2019). Digitalization and school leadership: On the complexity of leading for digitalization in school. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 36(3), 218–230. DOI:10.1108/IJILT-11-2018-0126

Hallinger, P. (2010) Leadership for learning: What we have learned from 30 years of empirical research [Paper presentation]. Hong Kong School Principals’ Conference 2010: Riding the Tide, the Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong.

Hallinger, P., & Huber, S. (2012). School leadership that makes a difference: International perspectives. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy, and Practice, 23(4), 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2012.681508

Hapsari, A. S., Hanif, M., Gunarhadi, & Roemintoyo. (2019). Motion graphic animation videos to improve the learning outcomes of elementary school students. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1245–1255. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.1245

Hauge, T. E. (2016). On the life of ICT and school leadership in a large-scale reform movement. In Digital Expectations and Experiences in Education (pp. 97–115). SensePublishers.

Haugsbakk, G. (2020). Special issue: 30 years of ICT and learning in education—Major changes and challenges. Seminar.net, 16(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.4043

Haugsbakk, G., & Nordkvelle, Y. T. (2020). On the expression of hegemony in the field of educational technology: A case study of editorials in a Norwegian academic journal. Seminar.net, 16(2), 19. https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.4044

Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, H. (1993). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 472–484. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.382.0472

Heintz, F., & Mannila, L. (2018). Computational thinking for all: An experience report on scaling up teaching computational thinking to all students in a major city in Sweden. ACM Inroads, 9(2), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159586

Hopkins, D., Stringfield, S., Harris, A., Stoll, L., & Mackay, T. (2014). School and system improvement: A narrative state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25, 257–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.885452

Islam, S. M., & Grönlund, Å. (2016). An international literature review of 1:1 computing in schools. Journal of Educational Change, 17(2), 191–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-016-9271-y

Jewitt, C., Moss, G., & Cardini, A. (2007). Pace, interactivity and multimodality in teachers’ design of texts for interactive whiteboards in the secondary school classroom. Learning, Media and Technology, 32, 303–317. DOI:10.1080/17439880701511149

Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation: Becoming a digitally mature enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Review.

Leino Lindell, T. (2020). Teachers calling for organizational support to digitalize teaching. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 37(5), 323–339. DOI: 10.1108/IJILT-02-2020-0017

Leithwood, K. A., & Riehl, C. (2003). What we know about successful school leadership. Laboratory for Student Success, Temple University.

Leithwood, K. A., & Riehl, C. (2005). What do we already know about successful school leadership? In W. A. Firestone & C. Riehl (Eds.), A new agenda for research in educational leadership (pp. 12–27). Teachers College Press.

Leithwood, K. A., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning: A review of research for the learning from leadership project. Wallace Foundation.

Leithwood, K. & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership: Its effects on students, teachers and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565829

Liu, F., Ritzhaupt, A., & Cavanaugh, C. (2013). Leaders of school technology innovation: A confirmatory factor analysis of the change facilitator style questionnaire (CFSQ). Journal of Educational Administration, 51(5), 576–593.

Luftman, J. (2000). Assessing business-IT alignment maturity. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4, https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00414

Lund, A., & Aagaard, T. (2020). Digitalization of teacher education: Are we prepared for epistemic change? Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 4(3–4), 56–71. http://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.3751

Mårell-Olsson, E., & Bergström, P. (2018). Digital transformation in Swedish schools: Principals’ strategic leadership and organisation of tablet-based one-to-one computing initiatives. Seminar.net: Media, Technology and Lifelong Learning, 14(2) 174–187.

McAfee, A., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2017). Machine, platform, crowd: Harnessing our digital future. WW Norton & Company.

Murphy, J. (2017). Creating communities of professionalism: Addressing cultural and structural barriers. In J. Sun, K. Pollock, & K. Leithwood (Eds.), How school leaders contribute to student success: The Four Paths Framework (pp. 239–262), Springer.

Northouse, P.G. (2019). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Los Angeles: Sage.

Olofsson, A., Lindberg, J. O., Hauge T., & Fransson, G. (2015). Uptake and use of digital technologies in primary and secondary schools: A thematic review of research. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 2006–2016, 103–121. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2011-04-02

Petersen, A. L. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions of principals’ ICT leadership. Contemporary Educational Technology, 5(4), 302–315.

Pettersson, F. (2021). Understanding digitalization and educational change in school by means of activity theory and the levels of learning concept. Education and Information Technologies, 6, 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10239-8

Rensfeldt, A. B., & Player-Koro, C. (2020). “Back to the future”: Socio-technical imaginaries in 50 years of school digitalization curriculum reforms. Seminar.net, 16(2), 20. https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.4048

Shanks, R. (2020). 30 years of ICT in education: Reflecting on educational technology projects. Seminar.net, 16(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.4047

Siljebo, J. (2020). Digitalization and digital transformation in schools: A challenge to educational theory? Education in the North, 27(2), 24–37. DOI: 10.26203/b0m3-dk35

Siljebo, J., Holmgren, T, Lindberg, J. O., From, J., Pettersson, F. & Öjefors Stark, K. (2021). School leadership in a digitalized society: Reflections on the Use of a Survey Tool for Improving Educational Practice. Paper presented at ECER 2021, European Conference on Educational Research, Online via Geneva, Switzerland, September 6-9, 2021, abstract available at https://eera-ecer.de/ecer-programmes/conference/26/contribution/50724

Sterrett, W., & Richardson, J. W. (2019). The change-ready leadership of technology-savvy superintendents. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(3), 227–242. doi: 10.1108/JEA-09-2018-0160

Sterrett, W., & Richardson, J. W. (2020). Supporting professional development through digital principal leadership. Journal of Organizational & Educational Leadership, 5(2), 1–19. https://digitalcommons.gardner-webb.edu/joel/vol5/iss2/4

Tillväxtverket [The Swedish Agency for Economic and Regional Growth]. (2017). Analysera digitalisering i företag [Analyze Digitization in Companies].

Vanderlinde, R., Dexter, S., & van Braak, J. (2012). School-based ICT policy plans in primary education: Elements, typologies and underlying processes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 505–519.

Vennebo, K. F. (2017). Innovative work in school development: Exploring leadership enactment. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(2), 298–315. doi.org/10.1177/1741143215617944

Willermark, S., & Pareto, L. (2020). Unpacking the role of boundaries in computer-supported collaborative teaching. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 29, 743–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-020-09378-w

Williams, P. (2008). Leading schools in the digital age: A clash of cultures. School Leadership and Management, 28(3), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430802145779

Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Yukl, G. A. (2002). Leadership in organizations (5th ed.), Prentice-Hall.

Yukl, G. A. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed., Global ed.). Pearson.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-30

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.