Participation inequalities on Pinterest
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v6i3.33376Keywords:
Digital inequality, digital divide, online participation, Pinterest, social mediaAbstract
Digital inequality scholarship has highlighted the importance of sociodemographic factors and internet experiences in how people use digital media in their lives. Some of this research has focused specifically on the adoption and use of social media, but much of this work has only investigated text-based platforms. Image-based sites such as Pinterest have largely been ignored in work about online participation inequalities. It remains unclear how existing findings about participation inequalities on text-based social media translate to image-based platforms. The present paper fills this gap by exploring differences in user engagement on Pinterest, one of the most popular social media platforms. The paper uses a mixed methods approach and analyzes both survey and interview data. This approach allows for a deeper understanding of the pipeline of online participation inequalities, a digital inequalities framework introduced by Shaw and Hargittai (2018). The survey data reveal that age, gender and internet skills strongly relate to participation on the platform. The interviews add more nuance by providing insights into reasons and motivations for Pinterest use as well as reasons for dropping out of the pipeline, beyond those identified in the survey. This mixed-methods approach allows insights into how participation barriers apply to image-based social media.
References
Atwood, G. (2023, May 4). Pinterest Now Supports At Least 41 Languages. Medium. https://atwoodgrace21.medium.com/pinterest-now-supports-at-least-41-languages-870e4c94012
Barwulor, C., McDonald, A., Hargittai, E., & Redmiles, E. M. (2021). “Disadvantaged in the American-dominated Internet”: Sex, Work, and Technology. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445378
Blank, G., & Lutz, C. (2017). Representativeness of Social Media in Great Britain: Investigating Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Pinterest, Google+, and Instagram. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(7), 741–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217717559
Bonnington, C. (2018, April 1). Pinterest Isn’t a Social Network. That’s What Makes It Great. Slate Magazine. https://slate.com/technology/2018/04/pinterest-isnt-a-social-network-thats-what-makes-it-great.html
Brake, D. R. (2014). Are We All Online Content Creators Now? Web 2.0 and Digital Divides*. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 591–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12042
Bundesamt für Gesundheit. (2020, August 2). Neues Coronavirus: So schützen wir uns (Stand 02.08.2020) [Information]. Bundesamt für Gesundheit. https://www.bag.admin.ch/bag/de/home/krankheiten/ausbrueche-epidemien-pandemien/aktuelle-ausbrueche-epidemien/novel-cov/so-schuetzen-wir-uns.html
Bundesamt für Statistik. (2022). Internetnutzung. Bundesamt für Statistik. https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/kultur-medien-informationsgesellschaft-sport/informationsgesellschaft/gesamtindikatoren/haushalte-bevoelkerung/internetnutzung.html
Correa, T. (2010). The Participation Divide Among “Online Experts”: Experience, Skills and Psychological Factors as Predictors of College Students’ Web Content Creation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01532.x
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Duggan, M., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2015). Social Media Update 2014. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2015/01/09/social-media-update-2014/
Eurostat. (2019). Community Survey on ICT Usage in Households and by Individuals. https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/a/28e0bbb8-af94-455d-93de-94985f62ade7/Model%20Questionnaire%202019%20v%201.1%20-%20after%20WG.pdf
Fredborg, L. (2018). DocTools ExtractData [Computer software]. DocTools ApS. https://wordaddins.com/products/extract-acronyms-bookmarks-tracked-changes-and-comments-from-word/
Fuchs, J., Fiers, F., & Hargittai, E. (2023). Engaging with COVID-19 content on social media in the United States: Does political affiliation matter? First Monday, 28(11), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v28i11.13289
Fung, I. C.-H., Blankenship, E. B., Ahweyevu, J. O., Cooper, L. K., Duke, C. H., Carswell, S. L., Jackson, A. M., Jenkins, J. C., Duncan, E. A., Liang, H., Fu, K.-W., & Tse, Z. T. H. (2020). Public Health Implications of Image-Based Social Media: A Systematic Review of Instagram, Pinterest, Tumblr, and Flickr. The Permanente Journal, 24, 18.307. https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/18.307
Gilbert, E., Bakhshi, S., Chang, S., & Terveen, L. (2013). “I need to try this”? A statistical overview of pinterest. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2427–2436. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481336
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.
Gottfried, J. (2024, January 31). Americans’ Social Media Use. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2024/01/31/americans-social-media-use/
Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People’s Online Skills. First Monday, 7(4). http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/942
Hargittai, E. (2020). Potential Biases in Big Data: Omitted Voices on Social Media. Social Science Computer Review, 38(1), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318788322
Hargittai, E., & Hsieh, Y. P. (2012). Succinct survey measures of Web-use skills. Social Science Computer Review, 30(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310397146
Hargittai, E., & Jennrich, K. (2016). The Online Participation Divide. In M. Lloyd & L. A. Friedland (Eds.), The Communication Crisis in America, And How to Fix It (pp. 199–213). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/info:doi/10.1057/978-1-349-94925-0_13
Hargittai, E., & Micheli, M. (2019). Internet Skills and Why They Matter. In M. Graham & W. H. Dutton, Society and the Internet. How Networks of Information and Communication are Changing Our Lives. (Second Edition, pp. 109–126). Oxford University Press.
Hoffmann, C. P., Lutz, C., & Meckel, M. (2015). Content creation on the Internet: A social cognitive perspective on the participation divide. Information, Communication & Society, 18(6), 696–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2014.991343
Junco, R. (2013). Inequalities in Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2328–2336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.005
Kemp, S. (2022, October 20). The Global State of Digital in October 2022. DataReportal – Global Digital Insights. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2022-october-global-statshot
Kemp, S. (2023, February 13). Digital 2023: Switzerland. DataReportal – Global Digital Insights. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-switzerland
Kwet, M. (2019). Digital colonialism: US empire and the new imperialism in the Global South. Race & Class, 60(4), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396818823172
Linder, R., Snodgrass, C., & Kerne, A. (2014). Everyday ideation: All of my ideas are on pinterest. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2411–2420. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557273
Litt, E. (2013). Measuring Users’ Internet Skills: A Review of Past Assessments and A Look Toward The Future. New Media & Society, 15(4), 612–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813475424
Majure, J. (2012). Teach Yourself VISUALLY Pinterest. O’Reilly. https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/teach-yourself-visually/9781118526354/
Matassi, M., & Boczkowski, P. (2021). An Agenda for Comparative Social Media Studies: The Value of Understanding Practices From Cross-National, Cross-Media, and Cross-Platform Perspectives. International Journal of Communication, 15(0), Article 0.
Miller, H. J., Chang, S., & Terveen, L. G. (2015). “I LOVE THIS SITE!” vs. “It’s a little girly”: Perceptions of and Initial User Experience with Pinterest. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 1728–1740. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675269
Mittal, S., Gupta, N., Dewan, P., & Kumaraguru, P. (2014). Pinned it! A Large Scale Study of the Pinterest Network. Proceedings of the 1st IKDD Conference on Data Sciences, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2567688.2567692
Mull, I. R., & Lee, S.-E. (2014). “PIN” pointing the motivational dimensions behind Pinterest. Computers in Human Behavior, 33(Supplement C), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.011
Nguyen, M. H., Hargittai, E., & Marler, W. (2021). Digital inequality in communication during a time of physical distancing: The case of COVID-19. Computers in Human Behavior, 120, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106717
Ottoni, R., Pesce, J. P., Casas, D. L., Jr, G. F., Jr, W. M., Kumaraguru, P., & Almeida, V. (2013). Ladies First: Analyzing Gender Roles and Behaviors in Pinterest. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 7(1), Article 1.
Pearce, K. E., & Rice, R. E. (2013). Digital Divides From Access to Activities: Comparing Mobile and Personal Computer Internet Users. Journal of Communication, 63(4), 721–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12045
Pew Research Center. (2024a). Internet/Broadband Fact Sheet. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/
Pew Research Center. (2024b, April 7). Social Media Fact Sheet. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/
Pinterest. (2023). A brief history. Pinterest Newsroom. https://newsroom.pinterest.com/en/company
Pinterest. (2024). A better feed that actually feeds the soul. Pinterest Newsroom. https://newsroom.pinterest.com/en-us/company
Powell, E., Wang-Hall, J., Bannister, J. A., Colera, E., & Lopez, F. G. (2018). Attachment security and social comparisons as predictors of Pinterest users’ body image concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.039
Puschmann, C., & Pentzold, C. (2020). A field comes of age: Tracking research on the internet within communication studies, 1994 to 2018. Internet Histories, 0(0), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701475.2020.1749805
Sashittal, H. C., & Jassawalla, A. R. (2015). Why Do College Students Use Pinterest? A Model and Implications for Scholars and Marketers. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 15(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2014.956196
Schradie, J. (2011). The digital production gap: The digital divide and Web 2.0 collide. Poetics, 39(2), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2011.02.003
Schroeder, S., Curcio, R., & Lundgren, L. (2019). Expanding the Learning Network: How Teachers Use Pinterest. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(2), 166–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1573354
Shaw, A., Fiers, F., & Hargittai, E. (2023). Participation inequality in the gig economy. Information, Communication & Society, 26(11), 2250–2267. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2085611
Shaw, A., & Hargittai, E. (2018). The Pipeline of Online Participation Inequalities: The Case of Wikipedia Editing. Journal of Communication, 68(1), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx003
Siegler, M. G. (2010, October 6). Instagram Launches With The Hope Of Igniting Communication Through Images [News]. TechCrunch. https://social.techcrunch.com/2010/10/06/instagram-launch/
Silverman, D. (2015). Interpreting Qualitative Data. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Snelson, C. L. (2016). Qualitative and Mixed Methods Social Media Research: A Review of the Literature. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915624574
Tankovska, H. (2021). Most used social media 2020. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/
Van Dijk, J. A. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Sage Publications.
Wakunuma, K. (2019). Power as an ethical concern in the Global South’s digital transformation: Power or empowerment? TATuP - Zeitschrift Für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie Und Praxis, 28(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.28.2.s29
Walsh, S. (2021, June 22). The Top 10 Social Media Sites & Platforms 2021. Search Engine Journal. https://www.searchenginejournal.com/social-media/biggest-social-media-sites/
Wang, R., Yang, F., Zheng, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2016). Why Do We Pin? New Gratifications Explain Unique Activities in Pinterest. Social Media + Society, 2(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116662173
Wasserman, I. M., & Richmond-Abbott, M. (2005). Gender and the Internet: Causes of Variation in Access, Level, and Scope of Use. Social Science Quarterly, 86(1), 252–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00301.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jaelle Fuchs
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
