The technological drama of AI
From private power to player engagement with AlphaGo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v6i440465Keywords:
algorithms, public engagement, resistance, science and technology studies (STS), politics of technologyAbstract
Introduced in 2016 as a watershed moment in AI development, the announcement of AlphaGo – the first AI system to beat a human professional in the board game of go – garnered a range of mass publicity, and this media coverage often forms the core of scholarly analysis, too. Drawing on a novel dataset of online discussions by professional and amateur players from 2016-2020 which covers the introduction and retirement of AlphaGo, as well as the construction of alternative systems, I outline a new perspective of the impact of the system on the playing community. Moving beyond recognition of audience-centric responses of enchantment/disenchantment by these players, I articulate a process of engagement through which meaning-making and reconstruction occurred within the go community. These findings emphasize the importance of including multiple perspectives in analysis and draws attention to the influence of impacted constituencies in AI construction.
References
Benjamin, R. (2016). Catching Our Breath: Critical Race STS and the Carceral Imagination. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 2(June), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2016.70
Benjamin, R. (2019). Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Polity Press.
Biernacki, R. (2014). Humanist Interpretation Versus Coding Text Samples. Qualitative Sociology, 37(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-014-9277-9
Binder, W. (2021). AlphaGo’s Deep Play: Technological Breakthrough as Social Drama. In The Cultural Life of Machine Learning (pp. 167–195). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56286-1_6
Binder, W. (2022). Technology as (Dis-)Enchantment. AlphaGo and the Meaning-Making of Artificial Intelligence. Cultural Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755221138720
Bory, P. (2019). Deep new: The shifting narratives of artificial intelligence from Deep Blue to AlphaGo. Convergence, 25(4), 627–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856519829679
Broussard, M. (2019). Artificial Unintelligence: How Computers Misunderstand the World. The MIT Press.
Brown, P. (1992). Popular Epidemiology and Toxic Waste Contamination : Lay and Professional Ways of Knowing. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33(3), 267–281.
Calo, R., & Citron, D. K. (2021). The Automated Adminstrative State: A Crisis of Legitimacy. Emory Law Journal, 70(4), 797–845. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asn&AN=149980004&site=ehost-live
Campolo, A., & Crawford, K. (2020). Enchanted Determinism: Power without Responsibility in Artificial Intelligence. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 6, 1. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2020.277
Clarke, A. E., & Charmaz, K. (2019). Grounded Theory and Situational Analysis. In SAGE Research Methods Foundations. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036825838
Coalition, S. L. S. (2021). Data-driven policing: Abolition requires a culture of resistance. The Abolitionist, 11–12.
Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12255.003.0004
Curran, N. M., Sun, J., & Hong, J. W. (2020). Anthropomorphizing AlphaGo: a content analysis of the framing of Google DeepMind’s AlphaGo in the Chinese and American press. AI and Society, 35(3), 727–735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00908-9
Dayan, D., & Katz, E. (1994). Media Events: The Live Broadcasting of History. Harvard University Press.
D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020). Data Feminism. The MIT Press.
Egri-Nagy, A., & Törmänen, A. (2020). The game is not over yet—go in the post-alphago era. Philosophies, 5(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies5040037
Ensmenger, N. (2011). Is chess the drosophila of artificial intelligence? A social history of an algorithm. Social Studies of Science, 42(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711424596
Epstein, S. (1995). The Construction of Lay Expertise: AIDS Activism and the Forging of Credibility in the Reform of Clinical Trials. Science, Technology & Human Values, 20(4), 408–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399502000402
Feinstein, N. (2011). Salvaging science literacy. Science Education, 95(1), 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20414
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
Gibney, E. (2016). Google AI algorithm masters ancient game of Go. Nature, 529(7587), 445–446. https://doi.org/10.1038/529445a
Guly, Christopher. (1998, December 31). "Deep Blue Turns Its Computing Talents to Worldly Pursuits." Financial Post.
Hamilton, S. N. (2000). The Last Chess Game: Computers, Media Events, and the Production of Spectacular Intelligence. Canadian Review of American Studies, 30(3), 339–360. https://doi.org/10.3138/cras-s030-03-05
Humphreys, L. (2005). Reframing social groups, closure, and stabilization in the social construction of technology. Social Epistemology, 19(2–3), 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720500145449
Jefferson, B. (2020). Digitize and Punish: Racial Criminalization in the Digital Age. University of Minnesota Press.
Kline, R., & Pinch, T. (1996). Users as agents of technological change: The social construction of the automobile in the rural United States. Technology and Culture, 37(4), 763–795. https://doi.org/10.2307/3107097
Law, J. (1986). On the Methods of Long Distance Control: Vessels, Navigation, and the Portuguese Route to India. In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? (pp. 234–263).
Leela Zero. (n.d.). https://zero.sjeng.org/
Marris, C. (2015). The Construction of Imaginaries of the Public as a Threat to Synthetic Biology. Science as Culture, 24(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2014.986320
Michael, M. (2009). Publics performing publics: Of PiGs, PiPs and politics. Public Understanding of Science, 18(5), 617–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508098581
Minocher, X. (2018). Online consumer activism: Challenging companies with Change.org. New Media & Society, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818803373
Minocher, X., & Randall, C. (2020). Predictable policing: New technology, old bias, and future resistance in big data surveillance. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856520933838
Moss, E., & Schüür, F. (2018). How Modes of Myth-Making Affect the Particulars of DS/ML Adoption in Industry. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings, 2018(1), 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/1559-8918.2018.01207
Natale, S., Bory, P., & Balbi, G. (2019). The rise of corporational determinism: digital media corporations and narratives of media change. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 36(4), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2019.1632469
Nguyen, C. T. (2020). Games: Agency as Art. Oxford University Press.
Oh, C., Lee, T., Kim, Y., Park, S. H., Kwon, S., & Suh, B. (2017). Us vs. Them: Understanding artificial intelligence technophobia over the Google DeepMind Challenge Match. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 2017-May, 2523–2534. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025539
Olazaran, M. (1996). A Sociological Study of the Official History of the Perceptrons Controversy. Social Studies of Science, 26(3), 611–659. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631296026003005
Oudshoorn, N., Rommes, E., & Stienstra, M. (2004). Configuring the User as Everybody: Gender and Design Cultures in Information and Communication Technologies. Science Technology and Human Values, 29(1), 30–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243903259190
Parthasarathy, S. (2010). Breaking the expertise barrier: Understanding activist strategies in science and technology policy domains. Science and Public Policy, 37(5), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X501180
Pfaffenberger, B. (1992). Technological Dramas. Science, Technology & Human Values, 17(3), 282–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399201700302
Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014003004
Selber, S. A. (2004). Technological dramas: A meta-discourse heuristic for critical literacy. Computers and Composition, 21(2), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2004.04.001
Shin, M., Kim, J., & Kim, M. (2021). Human Learning from Artificial Intelligence: Evidence from Human Go Players’ Decisions after AlphaGo. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 1795–1801.
Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., Dieleman, S., Grewe, D., Nham, J., Kalchbrenner, N., Sutskever, I., Lillicrap, T., Leach, M., Kavukcuoglu, K., Graepel, T., & Hassabis, D. (2016). Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, 529, 484. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16961
Sormani, P. (2023). Interfacing AlphaGo: Embodied play, object agency, and algorithmic drama. Social Studies of Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127231191284
Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2014). Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research. University of Chicago Press.
Taylor, P. J. (1995). Building on construction: An exploration of heterogeneous constructionism, using an analogy from psychology and a sketch from socio-economic modeling. Perspectives on Science, 3(1), 66–98.
Velkova, J., & Kaun, A. (2019). Algorithmic resistance: media practices and the politics of repair. Information Communication and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1657162
Wang, T. T., Gleave, A., Tseng, T., Belrose, N., Pelrine, K., Miller, J., Dennis, M. D., Duan, Y., Pogrebniak, V., Levine, S., & Russell, S. (2023). Adversarial Policies Beat Superhuman Go AIs. ArXiv Preprint, 1–58. http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.00241
Winner, L. (1980). Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315259697-21
Woodhouse, E. J. (2005). (Re)Constructing Technological Society by Taking Social Construction Even More Seriously. Social Epistemology, 19(2–3), 199–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720500145365
Wynne, B. (1992). Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science, 1(3), 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/1/3/004
Ziewitz, M. (2016). Governing Algorithms: Myth, Mess, and Methods. Science Technology and Human Values, 41(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915608948
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Xerxes Minocher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
