Imagining communities with ‘intelligent’ machines
Innovationism and the hope for alternative imagination
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v7i154875Keywords:
innovationism, digitalization, image recognition, racial bias, attention economyAbstract
Shared perceptions of the world are imagined with and within available media technological environments. In other words our communication environment conditions our social imagination and the ways in which we can see the world. The essay, based on the inaugural lecture of the author, discusses how this conditioning takes place and with what consequences in the contemporary digital societies. The essay draws on the research by the author on innovationism and discusses the concepts of reversed tools, content confusion and attention factory. Utilizing the study by Berg & Valaskivi (2023) on commercial image recognition services and their performance in recognizing religion in images as an example, the essay illustrates failures and imperfections of AI technologies which are often considered more neutral than human beings. The essay calls for critical thinking on digitalization and expansion of AI technologies and encourages prioritization of humane interests as well as social and cultural welbeing over commerciality in technological development.
References
Ammons, L. (1995). ‘Mules, Madonnas, Babies, Bath Water, Racial Imagery and Stereotypes: The African-American Woman and the Battered Woman Syndrome’, Wisconsin Law Review, 5 (5), pp. 1003–1080.
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
Berg, A. & Valaskivi, K. (2023a). Dataistunut uskonto: Kaupalliset kuvantunnistuspalvelut uskontoa ”tunnistamassa”. Teologinen Aikakauskirja, 128(2), pp. 174–200.
Berg, A. & Valaskivi, K. (2023b). ‘Representational Silence and Racial Biases in Commercial Image Recognition Services in the Context of Religion’, in Lindgren, S. (ed), Handbook of Critical Studies of Artificial Intelligence, Edward Elgar, pp. 607–618.
Briant, E. L. (2018a). ‘Evidence on Leave.EU, Eldon Insurance and US Health Insurance Industry, in Supplementary written evidence submitted by Dr Emma L Briant, Senior Lecturer at University of Essex’, Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee Inquiry into Fake News: UK Parliament [online]. Available at: https://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/digital-culture-media-and-sport-committee/fake-news/written/84032.html
Briant, E. L. (2018b). ‘Further Supplementary Written Evidence on Cambridge Analytica, Leave.EU and Eldon Insurance’, Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee Inquiry into Fake News: UK Parliament [online]. Available at: https://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/digital-culture-media-and-sport-committee/disinformation-and-fake-news/written/92380.html
Brubaker, R. (2017). ‘Between Nationalism and Civilizationism: The European Populist Moment in Comparative Perspective’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(8), pp. 1191–1226. https://doi-org.libproxy.helsinki.fi/10.1080/01419870.2017.1294700
Cesaire, A. (1955). Discours sur le Colonialisme. Paris: Presence Africaine.
CLC (2020). ‘Newly Published Cambridge Analytica Documents Show Unlawful Support for Trump in 2016’, CLC - Campaign Legal Center [online]. October 16. Available at: https://campaignlegal.org/update/newly-published-cambridge-analytica-documents-show-unlawful-support-trump-2016
Couldry, N. & Hepp, A. (2016). The Mediated Construction of Reality. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Donovan, J. & Dreyfus, E. (2022). Meme Wars. The Untold Story of the Online Battles Upending Democracy in America. London: Bloomsbury.
Einstein, M. (2016). Black Ops Advertising: Native Ads, Content Marketing, and the Covert World of the Digital Sell. New York: OR Books.
Gerbner, G. (1972). ‘Violence in Television Drama: Trends and Symbolic Functions’, in Comstock G. C. and Rubinstein E. A. (eds), Television and Social Behavior Reports and Papers, Volume I: Media Content and Control, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, pp. 28–187. Available at: https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/148976NCJRS.pdf
Hall, S. (1992). ‘Race, Culture, and Communications: Looking Backward and Forward at Cultural Studies’, Rethinking Marxism, 5(1), pp. 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935699208657998
Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: SAGE Publications.
Hobson, J. (2005). Venus in the Dark: Blackness and Beauty in Popular Culture. New York: Routledge.
Kannasto, E., Laaksonen, S.-M., & Knuutila, A. (2023). ’I [emoji] You! : Emojis as Emotional-Political Signifiers in Finnish Election Campaign Discussion Online’, in Bui, T. X. (ed), Proceedings of the 56th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 2370–2379. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10125/102925
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, 1st edn, New York: McGraw Hill.
McLuhan, M. & Fiore, Q. (1967). The Medium is the Massage. New York: Bantam.
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York, New York: New York University Press.
Peterson, M. A. (2003). Anthropology and Communication: Media and Myth in the New Millenium. London, UK: Berghahn Books.
Richardson-Stovall, J. (2012). ‘Image Slavery and Mass-Media Pollution: Popular Media, Beauty, and the Lives of Black Women’, Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 56, pp. 73–100. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23345262
Roberts, D. (1999). Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty. New York: Vintage
Ruckenstein, M. (2023). The Feel of Algorithms, 1st edn, University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520394568
Staples, R. (1994). The Black Family: Essays and Studies. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
Suchman, L. (2007). Human-machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Valaskivi, K. (2012). ‘Dimensions of Innovationism’, in Nynäs, P., Lassander, M. & Utriainen, T. (eds), Post-Secular Society, New Brunswick, N.J.: Routledge, pp. 129–156.
Valaskivi, K. (2020). ‘The Contemporary Faith of Innovationism’, in Bell, E., Gog, S., Simionca, A. & Taylor, S. (eds), Spirituality, Organisation and Neoliberalism: Understanding Lived Experiences, Edward Elgar, pp. 171–193.
Valaskivi (2022). ‘Circulation of Conspiracy Theories in the Attention Factory’, Popular Communication: The International Journal of Media and Culture, 20(3), pp. 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2022.2045996
Wallace, M. (1999). Black Macho and the Myth of the Superwoman. London: Verso.
Woodard, J. B., & Mastin, T. (2005). ‘Black Womanhood: “Essen ce” and its Treatment of Stereotypical Images of Black Women’, Journal of Black Studies, 36(2), pp. 264–281. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40034332
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Katja Valaskivi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
