Using Buddhist skillful means

Conducting digital ethnography in diasporic digital Chinese Buddhist communities in Canada

Authors

  • Xiao Han Université du Québec à Montréal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v7i154877

Keywords:

reflexivity, positionality, Canadian Chinese Buddhism, digital ethnography, WeChat ethnography

Abstract

This study addresses the growing call from scholars, such as Heidi Campbell, for a deeper reflection of methodological approaches to digital ethnography within various religious traditions and communities. In this article, I examine how I utilize a collection of “skillful means” informed by Buddhism, namely a mixed set of digital research methods encompassing reflexive choices and decisions, positioning, and creativities. This set of tools is situationally tailored for and derived from interacting with Chinese Buddhist diasporas in French Canada in the context of digital social media throughout my digital fieldwork. I use ethnographic vignettes to illustrate how these practices, afforded by the Buddhist ideas, digital possibilities, and ethnographic reflexivity, are crucial to constantly navigate, negotiate, and devise new strategies for exploring diverse networked digital field sites through interconnectivity, fluidity, immediacy and disruption and conducting multi-modal participant observation. By presenting the complexity and intricacy of the insider-outsider conundrum, I highlight key digital features of social media platforms such as WeChat, which can be strategically leveraged by a Buddhist researcher and practitioner to actively shape and present their digital image and voice within the communities they studies. I further reflect on how these dynamics can uniquely influence both the individuals and the communities being researched. Finally, I address the caveats and potential pitfalls this approach could potentially bring about.

References

Abidin,C. (2016) Visibility labour: Engaging with influencers’ fashion brands and #OOTD advertorial campaigns on Instagram. Media International Australia, 161(1), pp. 86–100.

Barbosa,S., and Milan, S. (2019) Do not harm in private chat apps: Ethical issues for research on and with WhatsApp. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 14(1), pp. 49–65.

Bluteau, J. M. (2021) Legitimising digital anthropology through immersive cohabitation: Becoming an observing participant in a blended digital landscape. Ethnography, 22(2), 267–285.

Boellstorff, T., Nardi, B., Pearce,C., et al. (2012) Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Campbell. H.A. (2012) Understanding the relationship between religion online and offline in a networked society. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 80(1), 64–93.

Campbell, H. A. (2013b). Community. In H. A. Campbell (Ed.), Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds (pp. 57-71). London; New York: Routledge.

Campbell, H. A. (Ed.). (2013a). Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds. London; New York: Routledge.

Cera, M. (2023) Digital ethnography: Ethics through the case of Qanon. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, 1119531. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1119531

Cui, K. (2015) The insider–outsider role of a Chinese researcher doing fieldwork in China: The implications of cultural context. Qualitative Social Work, 14(3), 356–369.

De Seta, G. (2020) Three lies of digital ethnography. Journal of Digital Social Research, 2(1), 77–97.

Dodds,T. (2019) Reporting with WhatsApp: Mobile chat applications’ impact on journalistic practices. Digital Journalism, 7(6), 725–745.

Gómez, Cruz. E. (2016) Photo-genic assemblages: Photography as a connective interface. In: Gomez Cruz E and Lehmuskallio A (eds.) Digital Photography in Everyday Life. Empirical Studies on Visual Material Practices. London: Routledge, pp. 228-242

Grieve. G.P. (2017) Cyber Zen: Imagining authentic Buddhist identity, community, and practices in the virtual world of Second life. New York (N.Y.): Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Grieve, G. P. (2017). Cyber Zen: Imagining authentic Buddhist identity, community, and practices in the virtual world of Second Life. London; New York: Routledge.

Grieve, G. P., & Veidlinger, D. (Eds.). (2018). Buddhism, the internet, and digital media: The pixel in the lotus. New York, NY: Routledge.

Han, X. (2022). Digital merit: A case study of a Chinese Buddhist meditation group on WeChat during the early outbreak of COVID-19 in China. Journal of Media and Religion, 21(4), 175-192.

Hine.C. (2015) Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Hine, C. (2016) From virtual ethnography to the embedded, embodied, everyday internet. In Hjorth L, Horst HA, Galloway A and Bell G (Eds.) The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography. New York: Routledge, pp.21-28.

Hine, C. (2017a) Ethnography and the internet: Taking account of emerging technological landscapes. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(3), 315–329.

Horst,H.A. (2009) Aesthetics of the self: digital mediations. In: Miller D (Ed.). Anthropology and the Individual: A Material Culture Perspective (pp. 99–114). London: Bloomsbury Academic. Retrieved July 9, 2023, from http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474214193.ch-007

Huang, W. (2017). WeChat together about Buddha: The construction of sacred space and religious community in Shanghai through social media. In S. Travagnin (Ed.), Religion and media in China: Insights and case studies from the mainland, Taiwan and Hong Kong (pp. 110–128). London: Routledge.

Irons, E. (2021) ‘Chryssides, George D. and Stephen E. Gregg (EDS) 2019. The Insider/Outsider Debate: New Perspectives in the study of religion.’, Fieldwork in Religion, 16(1). doi:10.1558/firn.20193.

Käihkö, I. (2020) Conflict chatnography: Instant messaging apps, social media and conflict ethnography in Ukraine. Ethnography, 21(1), 71-91.

Katie, A. , Cornish, H., and Joyce, A. (2015) Plotting belonging: Interrogating insider and outsider status in faith research. DISKUS, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.18792/diskus.v17i1.61

King, P.C. and Wei, Z. (2018) The role of face in a Chinese context of trust and trust building, International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 18(2), 149-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595818767207

Knott, K. (2010) Insider/outsider perspectives in the study of religions. In Hinnells J (Ed.), The Routledge companion to the study of religion (pp. 259-273).2nd Ed.

Labaree, R.V. (2002) The risk of ‘going observationalist’: Negotiating the hidden dilemmas of being an insider participant observer. Qualitative Research, 2(1), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794102002001641

Liu, R-F. (2022) Hybrid ethnography: Access, positioning, and data assembly. Ethnography, 146613812211454. https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381221145451

Merton, R.K. (1972) Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge. American Journal of Sociology 78(1), pp. 9–47.

Myerhoff, B., and Ruby, J. (1982) Introduction. In:Ruby J (Ed.), A crack in the mirror: Reflexive perspectives in anthropology (pp. 1–36). University of Pennsylvania Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv5137jf.5

Nairn, K., Showden, C.R., Sligo, J., et al. (2020) Consent requires a relationship: Rethinking group consent and its timing in ethnographic research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 23(6): 719–731.

Roberts, L.D. (2015) Ethical issues in conducting qualitative research in online communities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(3), 314–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2015.1008909

Sang, Y. (2021). The power of compassion: The Buddhist approach to COVID-19. In J. Golley, L. Jaivin, & S. Strange (Eds.), China’s yearbook: Crisis (pp. 1-30). Canberra: ANU Press.

Shmushko, K. (2021). On face masks as Buddhist merit: Buddhist responses to COVID-19. A case study of Tibetan Buddhism in Shanghai. Journal of Global Buddhism, 22(1), 235–244.

Shmushko, K. (2023). Digital footprints of Buddhism in Chinese-speaking cyberspace: Ethnography, developments, and challenges. Asiascape: Digital Asia, 10(1–2), 53–73.

Tarocco, F. (2017). Technologies of salvation: (Re)Locating Chinese Buddhism in the digital age. Journal of Global Buddhism, 18, 158.

Travagnin, S. (2019). Cyberactivities and civilized worship. In Z. Ji, G. Fisher, & A. Laliberté (Eds.), Buddhism after Mao: Negotiations, continuities, and reinventions (pp. 290–311). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.

Travagnin, S. (2020). From online Buddha halls to robot-monks: New developments in the long-term interaction between Buddhism, media, and technology in contemporary China. Review of Religion and Chinese Society, 7, 120–148.

Tseng, A. A. (2020). Mahayana Buddhists’ responses to COVID-19 pandemic. In A. A. Tseng (Ed.), Exploring the life and teachings of Mahayana Buddhists in Asia (pp. 1-30). New York: Nova Science.

Wilkinson, S.,and Kitzinger, C. (2013) Representing our own experience: Issues in “insider” research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(2), 251–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313483111

Wilson, J. (2020, July 8). Global roundup of Buddhist responses to COVID-19. Paper presented at the Jivaka Project Webinar. Retrieved from http://www.jivaka.net/buddhism-in-the-pandemic-video-materials

Yu, C. (2020) Insider, outsider or multiplex persona? Confessions of a digital ethnographer’s journey in Translation Studies. Journal of Specialised Translation, 34, 9-31.

Zayed, H. (2021) Researching digital sociality: using WhatsApp to study educational change. Journal of Digital Social Research 3(2). https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v3i2.80

Zhang, Y. (2017). Digital religion in China: A comparative perspective on Buddhism and Christianity’s online publics in Sina Weibo. Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture, 6(1), 44–67.

Article cover image

Downloads

Published

2025-05-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.