Issue ownership in the online campaign for Dutch general elections
A topic modeling approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v7i154885Keywords:
political advertising, issue ownership, political communication, topic modelingAbstract
Online political campaigns are often opaque, among other reasons because political parties often target their advertising to specific groups. Therefore, it is challenging for citizens, journalists, and academics to understand what political parties talk about in their campaigns, diminishing the public accountability of political parties. Through the lens of issue ownership theory, this study explores which issues Dutch political parties advertised on Meta during the 2021 national election. The study uses a relatively novel topic modeling process that is meant to limit human bias. We built a model that assigns issues to each ad (based on the ad text), creating a dataset of ad-issues matchings. The study is one of the first to present insights into the issues Dutch political parties communicated about during the national elections of 2021. Our findings show that issue owners are not the biggest advertisers on their issues and reveal that private gifts enable some political campaigns to claim ownership of many issues.
References
Abbe, O.G., Goodliffe, J., Herrnson, P.S., Patterson and K.D. (2003) ‘Agenda Setting in Congressional Elections: The Impact of Issues and Campaigns on Voting Behavior’, Political Research Quarterly, 56(4), pp. 419–430. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600404.
Adams, J., Ezrow, L. and Somer-Topcu, Z. (2011) ‘Is Anybody Listening? Evidence That Voters Do Not Respond to European Parties’ Policy Statements During Elections’, American Journal of Political Science, 55(2), pp. 370–382. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00489.x.
Adams, J., Ezrow, L. and Somer-Topcu, Z. (2014) ‘Do voters respond to party manifestos or to a wider information environment? An analysis of mass-elite linkages on European integration’, American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), pp. 967–978. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12115.
Andersen, R., Tilley, J. and Heath, A.F. (2005) ‘Political knowledge and enlightened preferences: Party choice through the electoral cycle’, British Journal of Political Science, 35(2), pp. 285–302. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123405000153.
Andeweg, R.B., De Winter And, L. and Müller, W.C. (2008) ‘Parliamentary Opposition in Post-Consociational Democracies: Austria, Belgium and the Netherlands’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 14(1–2), pp. 77–112. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330801921034.
Anstead, N. (2017) ‘Data-Driven Campaigning in the 2015 United Kingdom General Election’, International Journal of Press/Politics, 22(3), pp. 294–313. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217706163.
Banda, K.K. (2016) ‘Issue Ownership, Issue Positions, and Candidate Assessment’, Political Communication, 33(4), pp. 651–666. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1192569.
Béchara, H., Herzog, A., Jankin, S. and John, P. (2021) ‘Transfer learning for topic labeling: Analysis of the UK House of Commons speeches 1935–2014’, Research & Politics, 8(2), p. 20531680211022210. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680211022206.
Bischof, D. and Senninger, R. (2018) ‘Simple politics for the people? Complexity in campaign messages and political knowledge’, European Journal of Political Research, 57(2), pp. 473–495. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12235.
Bos, L., Lefevere, J. M., Thijssen, R., & Sheets, P. (2017). The impact of mediated party issue strategies on electoral support. Party Politics, 23(6), 760–771. Available at: doi.org/10.1177/1354068815626603
Chou, H.-Y. and Lien, N.-H. (2011) ‘What does a negative political ad really say? The effects of different content dimensions’, Journal of Marketing Communications, 17(4), pp. 281–295. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527260903546213.
Comparative Agendas Project (n.d.). https://www.comparativeagendas.net/netherlands
Coppock, A., Hill, S.J. and Vavreck, L. (2020) ‘The small effects of political advertising are small regardless of context, message, sender, or receiver : Evidence from 59 real-time randomized experiments’, pp. 1–7.
Dobber, T., Trilling, D. Helberger, N. and de Vreese, C. (2017) ‘Two crates of beer and 40 pizzas: the adoption of innovative political behavioural targeting techniques’, Internet Policy Review, 6(4), pp. 1–25. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14763/2017.4.777.
Dobber, T., Trilling, D. Helberger, N. and de Vreese, C. (2018) ‘Spiraling downward: The reciprocal relation between attitude toward political behavioral targeting and privacy concerns’, New Media & Society, 21, pp. 1–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818813372.
Dobber, T. and Vreese, C. de (2022) ‘Beyond manifestos: Exploring how political campaigns use online advertisements to communicate policy information and pledges’, Big Data & Society, 9(1), p. 20539517221095430. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221095433.
Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy.
Endres, K. and Panagopoulos, C. (2019) ‘Cross-pressure and voting behavior: Evidence from randomized experiments’, Journal of Politics, 81(3), pp. 1090–1095. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/703210.
Ergün, E. and Karsten, N. (2019) ‘Media logic in the coverage of election promises: comparative evidence from the Netherlands and the US’, Acta Politica [Preprint], (0123456789). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-019-00141-8.
Fowler, E.F., Franz, M.M, Martin, G.J, Peskowitz, Z. and Ridout, T.N. (2020) ‘Political Advertising Online and Offline’, American Political Science Review, pp. 1–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000696.
Geers, S. and Bos, L. (2017) ‘Priming Issues, Party Visibility, and Party Evaluations: The Impact on Vote Switching’, Political Communication, 34(3), pp. 344–366. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1201179.
Geys, B. (2012) ‘Success and failure in electoral competition: Selective issue emphasis under incomplete issue ownership’, Electoral Studies, 31(2), pp. 406–412. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2012.01.005.
Green-Pedersen, C. (2007). The Growing Importance of Issue Competition: The Changing Nature of Party Competition in Western Europe. Political Studies, 55(3), 607–628. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00686.x
Haenschen, K. (2022) ‘The Conditional Effects of Microtargeted Facebook Advertisements on Voter Turnout’, Political Behavior, pp. 409–433. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-8893529.
Haenschen, K. and Jennings, J. (2019) ‘Mobilizing Millennial Voters with Targeted Internet Advertisements: A Field Experiment’, Political Communication, 36, pp. 357–375. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1548530.
Hillygus, D.S. and Shields, T.G. (2009) The persuadable voter: Wedge issues in presidential campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Jamieson, K.H. (2013) ‘Messages, micro-targeting, and new media technologies’, Forum (Germany), 11(3), pp. 429–435. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2013-0052.
Kanne, P. & Van de Koppel, M. (2023, 16 September). I&O-zetelpeiling: NSC, PvdA/GL en VVD samen aan kop. I&O Research. Retrieved from https://www.ioresearch.nl/actueel/verkiezingsstrijd-ligt-open-nsc-pvda-gl-en-vvd-samen-aan-kop/
Kiesraad (2021). Officiële uitslag Tweede Kamerverkiezing 17 maart 2021. 26 March, https://www.kiesraad.nl/actueel/nieuws/2021/03/26/officiele-uitslag-tweede-kamerverkiezing-17-maart-2021
Kostadinova, P. (2017) ‘Party pledges in the news: Which election promises do the media report?’, Party Politics, 23(6), pp. 636–645. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815611649.
Kreiss, D. (2016) Prototype Politics: Technology-intensive campaigning and the data of democracy.
Krippendorff, K.H. (2004) Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology.
Kruikemeier, S., Vermeer, S. Metoui, N., Dobber, T. and Zarouali, B. (2022) ‘(Tar)getting you: The use of online political targeted messages on Facebook’, Big Data & Society, 9(2), p. 20539517221089624. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221089626.
Kruschinski, S. and Haller, A. (2017) ‘Restrictions on data-driven political microtargeting in Germany’, Internet Policy Review, 6(4), pp. 1–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14763/2017.4.780.
Lavigne, M. (2020) ‘Strengthening ties: The influence of microtargeting on partisan attitudes and the vote’, Party Politics, (August 2019), p. 135406882091838. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820918387.
Leerssen, P., Ausloos, J., Zarouali, B., Helberger, N. and de Vreese, C. (2019) ‘Platform ad archives: Promises and pitfalls’, Internet Policy Review, 8(4), pp. 1–21. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1421.
Leerssen, P., Dobber, T., Helberger, N. and de Vreese, C. (2021) ‘News from the ad archive: how journalists use the facebook ad library to hold online advertising accountable’, Information, Communication & Society, 0(0), pp. 1–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2021.2009002.
McCombs, M.E. and Shaw, D.L. (1972) ‘The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media’, The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), pp. 176–187.
van der Meer, T. and Damstra, A. (2022) ‘Associative issue ownership in a highly fragmented multiparty context: The Netherlands (2021)’, Acta Politica [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-022-00274-3.
NOS (2021). Donatie van 1,2 miljoen aan CDA door ondernemer Van der Wind roept vragen op. https://nos.nl/artikel/2385144-donatie-van-1-2-miljoen-aan-cda-door-ondernemer-van-der-wind-roept-vragen-op
NPO Radio (2021). Politieke partijen afhankelijker van donaties in 2021. https://www.nporadio1.nl/nieuws/politiek/25f3609a-d18b-4ea6-8166-8d4e2da00a5d/politieke-partijen-afhankelijker-van-donaties-in-2021
Parool (2021). Techondernemer schenkt D66 miljoen euro, PvdD krijgt meer dan 3 ton. https://www.parool.nl/nederland/techondernemer-schenkt-d66-miljoen-euro-pvdd-krijgt-meer-dan-3-ton~b9044379/
Passonneau, R., Habash, N.Y. and Rambow, O.C. (2006) ‘Inter-annotator agreement on a multilingual semantic annotation task’. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7916/D8FB5BDX.
Petrocik, J.R. (1996) ‘Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections , with a 1980 Case Study’, American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), pp. 825–850.
Petrocik, J.R., Benoit, W.L. and Hansen, G.J. (2003) ‘Issue Ownership and Presidential Campaigning, 1952-2000’, Political Science Quarterly, 118(4), pp. 599–626.
Rekker, R. and Rosema, M. (2019) ‘How (often) do voters change their consideration sets?’, Electoral Studies, 57(October 2017), pp. 284–293. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.08.006.
Rijksoverheid (2022). Wet financiering politieke partijen. https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0033004/2023-01-01
Turow, J., Carpini, M.X.D., Draper, N. and Howard-Williams, R., (2012) Americans Roundly Reject Tailored Political Advertising, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania.
Votta, F., Noroozian, A., Dobber, T., Helberger, N. and de Vreese, C. (2023) ‘Going Micro to Go Negative?: Targeting Toxicity using Facebook and Instagram Ads’, Computational Communication Research, 5(1), pp. 1–50. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5117/CCR2023.1.001.VOTT.
Walgrave, S. and De Swert, K. (2004) ‘The Making of the (Issues of the) Vlaams Blok’, Political Communication, 21(4), pp. 479–500. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600490522743.
Walgrave, S., Lefevere, J. and Nuytemans, M. (2009) ‘Issue Ownership Stability and Change: How Political Parties Claim and Maintain Issues Through Media Appearances’, Political Communication, 26(2), pp. 153–172. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600902850718.
Walgrave, S., Tresch, A. and Lefevere, J. (2015) ‘The Conceptualisation and Measurement of Issue Ownership’, West European Politics, 38(4), pp. 778–796. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1039381.
Zarouali, B., Dobber, T., De Pauw, G. and de Vreese, C. (2020) ‘Using a Personality-Profiling Algorithm to Investigate Political Microtargeting: Assessing the Persuasion Effects of Personality-Tailored Ads on Social Media’, Communication Research, pp. 1–26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220961965.
Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.J., Möller, J., Kruikemeier, S., Fathaigh, R.Ó., Irion, K., Dobber, T., Bodo, B. and de Vreese, C (2018) ‘Online political microtargeting: Promises and threats for democracy’, Utrecht Law Review, 14(1), pp. 82–96. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.420.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Joren Vrancken, Tom Dobber, Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
