Theism and the Future of Philosophy of Religion: Three Questions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69574/aejpr.v1i1.23623Keywords:
theism, nontheistic, future, aims, alternativeAbstract
Three interconnected issues are addressed: whether philosophy of religion needs to move away from theism; what could replace it; and how nontheistic conceptions of the divine should be incorporated in the field’s future discussions. Among the central points made are these: that attention to theism should diminish as a large number of nontheistic topics receive discussion in the philosophy of religion; that theism’s dominance in the structuring of our discussions should be replaced by a more deliberate focus on the aims of philosophy of religion, including in particular certain higher-level aims involving the resolution of problems in other areas of philosophy and the evaluation of religious practice; and that some of the most potentially fruitful ideas of the divine are not alternative conceptions of it per se, but rather are quite general ideas offering a framework for the discussion of alternative conceptions including theism.
References
Bishop, J. & K. Perszyk. (2023). God, Purpose, and Reality: A Euteleological Understanding of Theism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192864116.001.0001
Buckareff, A. & Y. Nagasawa. (2016). Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198722250.001.0001
Davies, B. (2020). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion (4th edition). Oxford: University Press.
Dole, A. (2013). Is Sceptical Religion Adequate as a Religion? Religious Studies, 49(2), pp. 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412513000103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412513000103
Dumsday, T. (Forthcoming). Alternative Conceptions of the Spiritual. New York, N.Y.: Bloomsbury.
Elliott, J. (2017). The Power of Humility in Sceptical Religion: Why Ietsism is Preferable to J. L. Schellenberg’s Ultimism. Religious Studies, 53(1), pp. 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412515000475 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412515000475
Palmqvist, C-J. (2023). The Old Gods as a Live Possibility: On the Rational Feasibility of Non-doxastic Paganism. Religious Studies, 59(4), pp. 651–664. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003441252200049X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S003441252200049X
Rottschaefer, W. A. (2016). Schellenberg’s Evolutionary Religion: How Evolutionary and how Religious? Religious Studies, 52(4), pp. 475–496. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412516000111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412516000111
Schellenberg, J. L. (2005). Prolegomena to a Philosophy of Religion. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Schellenberg, J. L. (2009). The Will to Imagine: A Justification of Skeptical Religion. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Schellenberg, J. L. (2019a). Progressive Atheism: How Moral Evolution Changes the God Debate. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
Schellenberg, J. L. (2019b). On Evolutionary Religion: in Interaction with Rottschaefer, Elliott, Dumsday, and Palmqvist. Religious Studies, 55(4): pp. 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412519000350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412519000350
Schellenberg, J.L & P. Draper. (2022). The Why and How of Renewal in Philosophy of Religion. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 14(1), pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2022.3289 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2022.3289
Schellenberg, J. L. (2024). What God Would Have Known: How Human Intellectual and Moral Development Undermines Christian Doctrine. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198912354.001.0001
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 John L. Schellenberg
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors of content published in the AGATHEOS retain the copyright to their works.
Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permits use, downloading, distribution, linking to and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
