Inequalities in internet use among older people between 2004 and 2021

Examining the cumulative impact of sociodemographic characteristics on internet non-use

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v6i3.27424

Keywords:

CHAID, internet non-use, older people, sociodemographic characteristics

Abstract

Although research already examined sociodemographic profiles of older internet (non-)users, it is unknown how combinations of sociodemographic factors relate to internet (non-)use. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the cumulative impact of sociodemographic characteristics on internet (non-)use among people aged 60 and older between 2004 and 2021, using representative survey data derived from the Belgian Ageing Studies (n = 61 376). Logistic regression analyses consistently associated low education, age 80 or older, low income and female gender with higher probabilities of being internet non-user between 2004 an 2021. CHAID analysis revealed that education and age are the strongest predictors of non-use. The cumulative impact of sociodemographic factors enables to reveal subgroups where prevalence rates of non-use are almost three times higher than the prevalence reported in the population of older people in general. The result that 80.1 percent of individuals aged 80 and above with limited education did not use the internet underscores the need for a comprehensive digital inclusion approach, including strategies to overcome economic barriers to internet access and tailored internet training initiatives addressing digital skills and motivation. CHAID results help policymakers and internet training providers identify subgroups with high prevalence rates of non-users and target interventions to those at a high risk of digital exclusion.

References

Acilar, A., & Sæbø, Ø. (2023). Towards understanding the gender digital divide: A systematic literature review. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 72(3), 233-249.

Aissaoui, N. (2022). The digital divide: a literature review and some directions for future research in light of COVID-19. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 71(8/9), 686-708. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-06-2020-0075

Anderberg, P., Skär, L., Abrahamsson, L., & Berglund, J. S. (2020). Older people’s use and nonuse of the internet in Sweden. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(23), 9050. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17239050

Bartol, J., Prevodnik, K., Vehovar, V., & Petrovčič, A. (2022). The roles of perceived privacy control, Internet privacy concerns and Internet skills in the direct and indirect Internet uses of older adults: Conceptual integration and empirical testing of a theoretical model. New Media & Society, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221122734

Berner, J., Aartsen, M., & Deeg, D. (2019). Predictors in starting and stopping Internet use between 2002 and 2012 by Dutch adults 65 years and older. Health Informatics Journal, 25(3), 715-730. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458217720398

Berner, J., Rennemark, M., Jogreus, C., Anderberg, P., Skoldunger, A., Wahlberg, M., Elmstahl, S., & Berglund, J. (2015). Factors influencing Internet usage in older adults (65 years and above) living in rural and urban Sweden. Health Informatics Journal, 21(3), 237-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458214521226

Biggs, D., De Ville, B., & Suen, E. (1991). A method of choosing multiway partitions for classification and decision trees. Journal of Applied Statistics, 18, 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664769100000005

Blazic, B. J., Cigoj, P., & Blažič, A. J. (2023). Web-Service Security and The Digital Skills of Users: An Exploratory Study of Countries in Europe. Journal of Internet Services and Information Security (JISIS), 13(3), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.58346/JISIS.2023.I3.004

Borg, K., & Smith, L. (2018). Digital inclusion and online behaviour: five typologies of Australian internet users. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(4), 367-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2018.1436593

Breen, R., Karlson, K. B., & Holm, A. (2018). Interpreting and understanding logits, probits, and other nonlinear probability models. Annual Review of Sociology, 44, 39-54. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041429

Bünning, M., Schlomann, A., Memmer, N., Tesch-Römer, C., & Wahl, H.-W. (2023). Digital gender gap in the second half of life is declining: Changes in gendered internet use between 2014 and 2021 in Germany. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, gbad079. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbad079

Calhoun, D., & Lee, S. B. (2019). Computer usage and cognitive capability of older adults: Analysis of data from the Health and Retirement Study. Educational Gerontology, 45(1), 22-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2019.1575026

Chamel, O., & Dahlgruen, B. (2021). Growing up: An urban design approach based on increased density. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 253, 27-35. https://doi.org/10.2495/SC210031

Courvoisier, D. S., Combescure, C., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2011). Performance of logistic regression modeling: beyond the number of events per variable, the role of data structure. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 64(9), 993-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.012

Dobransky, K., & Hargittai, E. (2016). Unrealized potential: Exploring the digital disability divide. Poetics, 58, 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2016.08.003

Dolničar, V., Grošelj, D., Hrast, M. F., Vehovar, V., & Petrovčič, A. (2018). The role of social support networks in proxy Internet use from the intergenerational solidarity perspective. Telematics and Informatics, 35(2), 305-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.005

Dziuba, S., Cierniak-Emerych, A., Michalski, G., Poulova, P., Mohelská, H., & Klimova, B. (2021). The use of the internet by older adults in Poland. Universal Access in the Information Society, 20(1), 171-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00700-y

Eurostat. (2023). Internet access and use statistics - households and individuals.

Field, A. (2017). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage Publications Ltd.

Foster, L., Tomlinson, M., & Walker, A. (2019). Older people and Social Quality–what difference does income make? Ageing & Society, 39(11), 2351-2376. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X1800048X

Friemel, T. N. (2016). The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media & Society, 18, 313-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814538648

Gallani, S., Krishnan, R., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2015). Applications of fractional response model to the study of bounded dependent variables in accounting research. Harvard Business School.

Gallistl, V., Rohner, R., Hengl, L., & Kolland, F. (2021). Doing digital exclusion–technology practices of older internet non-users. Journal of Aging Studies, 59, 100973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100973

Gallistl, V., Rohner, R., Seifert, A., & Wanka, A. (2020). Configuring the older non-user: Between research, policy and practice of digital exclusion. Social Inclusion, 8(2), 233-243. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i2.2607

Gallistl, V., & Wanka, A. (2022). The internet multiple: How internet practices are valued in later life. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 15(2), 103-126. https://doi.org/10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.3563

Gródek-Szostak, Z., Siguencia, L. O., Niemczyk, A., & Seweryn, R. (2021). Digital exclusion of elderly citizens: Polish experiences based on the project Adult Social Inclusion in a Digital Environment (ASIDE). Ekonomia, 27(4), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.19195/2658-1310.27.4.4

Guillon, M., Dumbleton, K., Theodoratos, P., Gobbe, M., Wooley, C. B., & Moody, K. (2016). The effects of age, refractive status, and luminance on pupil size. Optometry and Vision Science, 93, 1093-1100. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000893

Hargittai, E., & Dobransky, K. (2017). Old dogs, new clicks: Digital inequality in skills and uses among older adults. Canadian Journal of Communication, 42, 195-212. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2017v42n2a3176

Hargittai, E., Piper, A. M., & Morris, M. R. (2019). From internet access to internet skills: digital inequality among older adults. Universal Access in the Information Society, 18, 881-890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0617-5

Helsper, E. J. (2019). Why location-based studies offer new opportunities for a better understanding of socio-digital inequalities? In Desigualdades Digitais no Espaco Urbano: Um Estudo Sobre o Acesso e o Uso da Internet na Cidade de São Paulo (pp. 19-44). São Paulo, Brazil: Núcleo de Informação e Coordenação do Ponto BR.

Helsper, E. J., & Reisdorf, B. C. (2016). The emergence of a “digital underclass” in Great Britain and Sweden: Changing reasons for digital exclusion. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1253-1270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816634676

Hesselberth, P. (2018). Discourses on disconnectivity and the right to disconnect. New Media & Society, 20(5), 1994-2010. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817711449

Holcomb, W. L., Chaiworapongsa, T., Luke, D. A., & Burgdorf, K. D. (2001). An odd measure of risk: use and misuse of the odds ratio. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 98(4), 685-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01488-0

Holmes, H., & Burgess, G. (2022). Digital exclusion and poverty in the UK: How structural inequality shapes experiences of getting online. Digital Geography and Society, 3, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100041

Hunsaker, A., & Hargittai, E. (2018). A review of Internet use among older adults. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3937-3954. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818787348

Kass, G. V. (1980). An Exploratory Technique for Investigating Large Quantities of Categorical Data. Applied Statistics, 29(2), 119-127. https://doi.org/10.2307/2986296

König, R., Seifert, A., & Doh, M. (2018). Internet use among older Europeans: an analysis based on SHARE data. Universal Access in the Information Society, 17(3), 621-633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0609-5

Krug, R. d. R., Xavier, A. J., & d’Orsi, E. (2018). Factors associated with maintenance of the use of internet, EpiFloripa Idoso longitudinal study. Revista de Saúde Publica, 52. https://doi.org/10.11606/S1518-8787.2018052000216

Lagacé, M., Charmarkeh, H., Laplante, J., & Tanguay, A. (2015). How ageism contributes to the second-level digital divide: The case of Canadian seniors. Journal of Technologies and Human Usability, 11(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.18848/2381-9227/CGP/v11i04/56439

Lee, J. Y. (2022). A qualitative study of latent reasons for internet non-and limited user. Communication Research and Practice, 8(4), 364-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2022.2143666

Leukel, J., Özbek, G., & Sugumaran, V. (2022). Application of logistic regression to explain internet use among older adults: a review of the empirical literature. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00960-1

Leukel, J., Schehl, B., & Sugumaran, V. (2021). Digital inequality among older adults: Explaining differences in the breadth of Internet use. Information, Communication & Society, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1942951

Lips, M., Eppel, E., Craig, B., & Struthers, S. (2020). Understanding, explaining, and self-evaluating digital inclusion and exclusion among senior citizens. Victoria University of Wellington.

Lüders, M., & Brandtzæg, P. B. (2017). ‘My children tell me it’s so simple’: A mixed-methods approach to understand older non-users’ perceptions of Social Networking Sites. New Media & Society, 19(2), 181-198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814554064

Manor, S., & Herscovici, A. (2021). “For us, Alibaba was just a story”: Despite the power of habit older people are gradually adopting the digital discourse. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 15(1), 103-126. https://doi.org/10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.3399

Matthews, K., Nazroo, J., & Marshall, A. (2019). Digital inclusion in later life: cohort changes in internet use over a ten-year period in England. Ageing & Society, 39(9), 1914-1932. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X18000326

McCosker, A., Critchley, C., Walshe, J., Tucker, J., & Suchowerska, R. (2021). Accounting for diversity in older adults’ digital inclusion and literacy: the impact of a national intervention. Ageing & Society, 43(11), 2629-2649. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X21001550

Mood, C. (2010). Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review, 26(1), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp006

Neves, B. B., Waycott, J., & Malta, S. (2018). Old and afraid of new communication technologies? Reconceptualising and contesting the 'age-based digital divide'. Journal of Sociology, 54, 236-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783318766119

Niu, L. (2020). A review of the application of logistic regression in educational research: Common issues, implications, and suggestions. Educational Review, 72(1), 41-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1483892

Nuechterlein, J. E., & Shelanski, H. (2021). Building on What Works: An Analysis of US Broadband Policy. Federal Communications Law Journal, 73(2), 219-258.

Osborne, J. W. (2008). Best practices in quantitative methods. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Pang, C., Collin Wang, Z., McGrenere, J., Leung, R., Dai, J., & Moffatt, K. (2021). Technology adoption and learning preferences for older adults: evolving perceptions, ongoing challenges, and emerging design opportunities. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445702

Peduzzi, P., Concato, J., Kemper, E., Holford, T. R., & Feinstein, A. R. (1996). A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 49(12), 1373-1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3

Petrovčič, A., Reisdorf, B. C., Grošelj, D., & Prevodnik, K. (2022). A Typology of Aging Internet Users: Exploring Digital Gradations in Internet Skills and Uses. Social Science Computer Review, 08944393221117753. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393221117753

Quan-Haase, A., Mo, G. Y., & Wellman, B. (2017). Connected seniors: How older adults in East York exchange social support online and offline. Information, Communication & Society, 20(7), 967-983. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1305428

Quittschalle, J., Stein, J., Luppa, M., Pabst, A., Löbner, M., Koenig, H.-H., & Riedel-Heller, S. G. (2020). Internet use in old age: results of a German population-representative survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(11), e15543. https://doi.org/10.2196/15543

Reisdorf, B., Axelsson, A.-S., & Maurin, H. (2016). Living offline-A qualitative study of internet non-use in Great Britain and Sweden. Reisdorf, BC, Axelsson, AS, & Maurin, H.(2012). Living Offline-A Qualitative Study of Internet Non-Use in Great Britain and Sweden. Selected Papers of Internet Research, 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2721929

Reisdorf, B. C., & Groselj, D. (2017). Internet (non-) use types and motivational access: Implications for digital inequalities research. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1157-1176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815621539

Reisdorf, B. C., Petrovčič, A., & Grošelj, D. (2021). Going online on behalf of someone else: Characteristics of Internet users who act as proxy users. New Media & Society, 23(8), 2409-2429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820928051

Reisdorf, B. C., & Rhinesmith, C. (2018). An asset-based approach to digital inclusion research in the US context. In M. Ragnedda & B. Mutsvairo (Eds.), Digital inclusion: An international comparative analysis (pp. 39-54). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Ren, W., & Zhu, X. (2023). The Age-Based Digital Divides in China: Trends and Socioeconomic Differentials (2010-2020). Available at SSRN 4470848. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4470848

Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2014). Diffusion of innovations. In D. W. Stacks & M. B. Salwen (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 432-448). Routledge Publishing Ltd.

Rönkkö, M., Aalto, E., Tenhunen, H., & Aguirre-Urreta, M. I. (2022). Eight simple guidelines for improved understanding of transformations and nonlinear effects. Organizational Research Methods, 25(1), 48-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428121991907

Shi, S., Zhang, L., & Wang, G. (2023). Bridging the Digital Divide: Internet Use of Older People from the Perspective of Peer Effects. Sustainability, 15(15), 12024. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151512024

Silver, M. P. (2014). Socio-economic status over the lifecourse and internet use in older adulthood. Ageing & Society, 34, 1019-1034. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X12001420

Tsatsou, P. (2022). Vulnerable people’s digital inclusion: Intersectionality patterns and associated lessons. Information, Communication & Society, 25(10), 1475-1494. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1873402

van Boekel, L. C., Peek, S. T., & Luijkx, K. G. (2017). Diversity in Older Adults' Use of the Internet: Identifying Subgroups Through Latent Class Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(5), e180. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6853

van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). A nuanced understanding of Internet use and non-use among the elderly. European Journal of Communication, 30, 171-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115578059

Verté, D., De Witte, N., & De Donder, L. (2007). Guidelines for local policy towards older people in Flanders. Vanden Broele, Brugge.

Wan, X., Lighthall, N. R., & Xie, R. (2022). Consistent and robust predictors of Internet Use among older adults over time identified by machine learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 137, 107413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107413

Warschauer, M., & Tate, T. (2017). Digital divides and social inclusion. In Handbook of writing, literacies, and education in digital cultures (pp. 63-75). Routledge.

Wilson-Menzfeld, G., & Brittain, K. (2022). Digital exclusion in later life: A narrative review. Vulnerable People and Digital Inclusion: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives, 169-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94122-2_9

Yu, R. P., Ellison, N. B., McCammon, R. J., & Langa, K. M. (2016). Mapping the two levels of digital divide: Internet access and social network site adoption among older adults in the USA. Information, Communication & Society, 19(10), 1445-1464. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1109695

Article cover

Downloads

Published

2024-11-01

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.