Context Adaptation in Public Administration Change Processes: A Case Within the Swedish Transport Administration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.40354Keywords:
change context, context adaptation, public administration, change management, contingency approachAbstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore context adaptation of change processes in the setting of public administration. This is done by adopting a contingency approach. Thus, the research question guiding this study is: How is context adaptation enacted in change processes and what are the behavioural implications? Drawing on empirical findings from the Swedish Transport Administration, the study illustrates the enactment of context adaptation and its behavioural implications through the phases of change. The analysis identifies key contextual factors and contingency variables, demonstrating that context adaptation is enacted by managers and employees. Notably, certain context adaptation led to contradictory behavioural patterns. This study hence contributes to public administration literature by exploring the enactment of context adaption in change processes which represents an understudied phenomenon in this field.
Downloads
References
Abeygunasekera, A.W.J.C., Bandara, W., Wynn, M.T. and Yigitbasioglu, O. (2022) How to make it stick? Institutionalising process improvement initiatives. Business Process Management Journal, 28(3): 807–833. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-03-2021-0170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-03-2021-0170
Alfes, K., Shantz, A.D., Bailey, C., Conway, E., Monks, K. and Fu, N. (2019) Perceived human resource system strength and employee reactions toward change: Revisiting human resource’s remit as change agent. Human Resource Management, 58(3): 239–252. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21948
Al-Haddad, S. and Kotnour, T. (2015) Integrating the organizational change literature: a model for successful change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(2): 234–262. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-11-2013-0215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-11-2013-0215
Alvehus, J. and Loodin, H. (2023) Special Issue Introduction: Making Sense of Institutional Changes in the Welfare Professions. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 27(3):1–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.v27i3.15895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.v27i3.15895
Anderson, S.W. and Young, S.M. (1999) The impact of contextual and process factors on the evaluation of activity-based costing systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24(7): 525–559. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00018-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00018-5
Balthu, K.C. and Clegg, B. (2021) Improving professional service operations: action research in a law firm. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 41(6): 805–829, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-10-2020-0696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-10-2020-0696
Bamford, D.R. and Forrester, P.L. (2003) Managing planned and emergent change within an operations management environment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(5): 546–564. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570310471857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570310471857
Bell, E., Bryman, A. and Harley, B. (2019) Business Research Methods, Oxford University Press.
Biedenbach, T. and Söderholm, A. (2008) The Challenge of Organizing Change in Hypercompetitive Industries: A Literature Review. Journal of Change Management, 8(2): 123–145. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010801953967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010801953967
Bonomi Savignon, A. and Costumato, L. (2024) Project management logics for agile public strategic management: Propositions from the literature and a research agenda. Information Polity, 29(2): 153–178. doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-230061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-230061
Brandes, B. and Lai, Y.L. (2022) Addressing resistance to change through a micro interpersonal lens: an investigation into the coaching process. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 35(3): 666–681. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-07-2021-0214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-07-2021-0214
Brazzale, P.L., Cooper–Thomas, H.D., Haar, J. and Smollan, R.K. (2021) Change ubiquity: employee perceptions of change prevalence from three countries. Personnel Review, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-04-2019-0211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-04-2019-0211
Brorström, S., Kallio, K.-M., Karlsson, T.S. and Nyland, K. (2023) Call for Papers: Exploring Current Themes, Future Trends, and Challenges in Scandinavian Public Management. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, doi: https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.2023.18382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.2023.18382
Burnes, B. (1996) No such thing as … a ‘one best way’ to manage organizational change. Management Decision, 34(10): 11–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749610150649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749610150649
Burnes, B. (2004) Managing Change: A Strategic Approach to Organisational Dynamics, 4. ed. Prentice Hall, Harlow.
Chaudhry, S. (2020) Understanding Change Enablers in Service Organizations: A Contingency Theory Perspective. South Asian Journal of Management, 27(2): 54–83.
Cloutier, C., Denis, J.-L., Langley, A. and Lamothe, L. (2016) Agency at the Managerial Interface: Public Sector Reform as Institutional Work. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(2): 259–276. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv009
Darby, J.L., Fugate, B.S. and Murray, J.B. (2019) Interpretive research: A complementary approach to seeking knowledge in supply chain management. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 30(2): 395–413. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-07-2018-0187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-07-2018-0187
Dawson, P. (1996) Beyond conventional change models: A processual perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 34(2): 57–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/103841119603400207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/103841119603400207
Dmitrijeva, J., Schroeder, A., Ziaee Bigdeli, A. and Baines, T. (2020) Context matters: how internal and external factors impact servitization. Production Planning & Control, 31(13):1077–1097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1699195
Donaldson, L. (2001) The Contingency Theory of Organizations, Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229249
Dunphy, D. and Stace, D. (1993) The Strategic Management of Corporate Change. Human Relations, 46(8): 905–920. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600801
Dunphy, D.C. and Stace, D.A. (1988) Transformational and Coercive Strategies for Planned Organizational Change: Beyond the O.D. Model. Organization Studies, 9(3): 317–334. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/017084068800900302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/017084068800900302
Edmondson, A.C. (2018) Organizational Change, in Augier, M. and Teece, D.J. (Eds.), The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management, Palgrave Macmillan UK, London. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-00772-8_767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-00772-8_767
Edwards, K., Prætorius, T. and Nielsen, A.P. (2020) A Model of Cascading Change: Orchestrating Planned and Emergent Change to Ensure Employee Participation. Journal of Change Management, 20(4): 342–368. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2020.1755341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2020.1755341
Ekonomistyrningsverket. (2007), Vägledning, Att leda förändring i offentlig verksamhet, ESV 2017:70.
Frishammar, J. (2006), Organizational Environment Revisited: A Conceptual Review and Integration. International Studies of Management & Organization, 36(3): 22–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.2753/IMO0020-8825360302 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/IMO0020-8825360302
Galbraith, J.R. and Nathanson, D.A. (1978), Strategy Implementation: The Role of Structure and Process, West.
Grant, M.R. and Lincoln, Y. (2021) A Conversation About Rethinking Criteria for Qualitative and Interpretive Research: Quality as Trustworthiness. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 14(2): 1–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v14i2a403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v14i2a403
Hailey, V.H. and Balogun, J. (2002) Devising Context Sensitive Approaches To Change: The Example of Glaxo Wellcome. Long Range Planning, 35(2):26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(02)00035-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(02)00045-6
Hameed, I., Khan, A.K., Sabharwal, M., Arain, G.A. and Hameed, I. (2019) Managing Successful Change Efforts in the Public Sector: An Employee’s Readiness for Change Perspective. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(3): 398–421. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X17729869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X17729869
Haug, N., Dan, S. and Mergel, I. (2024) Digitally-induced change in the public sector: a systematic review and research agenda. Public Management Review, 26(7): 1963–1987. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2234917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2234917
Hughes, M. (2011) Do 70 Per Cent of All Organizational Change Initiatives Really Fail?. Journal of Change Management, 11(4): 451–464. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2011.630506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2011.630506
Jones, L., Watson, B., Hobman, E., Bordia, P., Gallois, C. and Callan, V.J. (2008) Employee perceptions of organizational change: impact of hierarchical level. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 29(4): 294–316. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730810876122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730810876122
Ketokivi, M. and Choi, T. (2014) Renaissance of case research as a scientific method. Journal of Operations Management, 32(5): 232–240. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.004
Khaw, K.W., Alnoor, A., AL-Abrrow, H., Tiberius, V., Ganesan, Y. and Atshan, N.A. (2023) Reactions towards organizational change: a systematic literature review. Current Psychology, 42(22): 19137–19160. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03070-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03070-6
Kuipers, B.S., Higgs, M., Kickert, W., Tummers, L., Grandia, J. and Van Der Voet, J. (2014) The management of change in public organizations: A literature review. Public Administration, 92(1): 1–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12040
Kvale, S. (2022), Doing Interviews, Sage Publications Ltd, London, doi: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208963 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208963
Lewin, K. (1947) Frontiers in Group Dynamics: Concept, Method and Reality in Social Science; Social Equilibria and Social Change. Human Relations, 1(1): 5–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100103
Li, F. (2020) Leading digital transformation: three emerging approaches for managing the transition. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40(6): 809–817. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-04-2020-0202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-04-2020-0202
Liu, J., Ulianov, C., Hyde, P., Ruscelli, A.L. and Cecchetti, G. (2022) Novel approach for validation of innovative modules for railway traffic management systems in a virtual environment. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 236(2): 139–148. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/09544097211041879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09544097211041879
Lofquist, E.A. and Isaksen, S.G. (2019) Cleared for Takeoff? A Snapshot of Context for Change in a High-Risk Industry. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 55(3): 277–305, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886319832011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886319832011
Long, S., Gentry, L. and Bham, G.H. (2012) Driver perceptions and sources of user dissatisfaction in the implementation of variable speed limit systems. Transport Policy, 23: 1–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.05.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.05.007
Luthans, F. and Stewart, T.I. (1977) A General contingency Theory of Management. Academy of Management Review, 2(2): 181–195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/257902
Miles, Huberman and Saldana. (2014) Fundamentals of Qualitative Data Analysis.
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. and Saldaña, J. (2020) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, Fourth edition, SAGE.
Molin, F. and Norrman Brandt, E. (2023) Transformational Change and Digitalization—The Case of the Swedish Road and Transport Administration Behavioral Sciences, 13(2): 110. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020110
Norrman, A. and Näslund, D. (2025) Insights from an intervention of a performance measurement system covering all change steps: the paradox of informed change leadership passivity. Production Planning & Control, 1–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2025.2453908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2025.2453908
Nylin, M., Johansson Westberg, J. and Lundberg, J. (2022) Reduced autonomy workspace (RAW)—an interaction design approach for human-automation cooperation. Cognition, Technology & Work, 24(2): 261–273. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-022-00695-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-022-00695-2
Øvretveit, J., Andreen‐Sachs, M., Carlsson, J., Gustafsson, H., Hansson, J., Keller, C., Lofgren, S., et al. (2012) Implementing organisation and management innovations in Swedish healthcare : Lessons from a comparison of 12 cases. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 26(2): 237–257. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14777261211230790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14777261211230790
Patriarca, R., Di Gravio, G., Mancini, M. and Costantino, F. (2016) Change management in the ATM system: Integrating information in the preliminary system safety assessment. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 9(2): 121-138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJADS.2016.080123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJADS.2016.080123
Pettigrew, A.M. (1990) Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice. Organization Science, 1(3): 267–292. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.3.267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.3.267
Pettigrew, A.M. (2013) The Conduct of Qualitative Research in Organizational Settings. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(2): 123–126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2012.00925.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2012.00925.x
Pettigrew, A.M., Woodman, R.W. and Cameron, K.S. (2001) Studying Organizational Change and Development: Challenges for Future Research. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(4): 697–713. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3069411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3069411
Prasad, P. (2018) Crafting Qualitative Research | Beyond Positivist Traditions. Taylor & Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315715070
Reyes-Muñoz, A., Barrado, C., Pastor, E. and Royo, P. (2023) ATC Human Factors Involved in RPAS Contingency Management in Non-Segregated Airspace. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 13(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031408
Rodham, K., Fox, F. and Doran, N. (2015) Exploring analytical trustworthiness and the process of reaching consensus in interpretative phenomenological analysis: lost in transcription. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(1): 59–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2013.852368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2013.852368
Ruslin, Mashuri, Rasak and Syam. (2022) Semi-structured Interview: A Methodological Reflection on the Development of a Qualitative Research Instrument in Educational Studies. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 12(1): 22-29. doi: https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-1201052229
Ryan, G.W. and Bernard, H.R. (2003) Techniques to Identify Themes. Field Methods, 15(1): 85–109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239569
Seijts, G.H. and Roberts, M. (2011) The impact of employee perceptions on change in a municipal government. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 32(2): 190–213. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731111113006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731111113006
Semcon. (2024) XLPM Online, available at: https://xlpm-online.com/
Silver, S.A., McQuillan, R., Harel, Z., Weizman, A.V., Thomas, A., Nesrallah, G., Bell, C.M., et al. (2016) How to sustain change and support continuous quality improvement. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 11(5): 916–924. doi: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.11501015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.11501015
Stathis, M., Marc, B., Nora, B., Tom, L., Anthony, S., Andrea, P. and Gabriele, F. (2022) Challenges from the Introduction of Artificial Intelligence in the European Air Traffic Management System. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(29): 1–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.440
Supriharyanti, E. and Sukoco, B.M. (2022) Organizational change capability: a systematic review and future research directions. Management Research Review, 46(1): 46–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-01-2021-0039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-01-2021-0039
Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency. (2024) Centre for Critical Infrastructure Protection Research (CenCIP2) 2021-2024: slutrapport. MSB2500.
Thompson, J.D. (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory, Mc Graw-Hill.
Todnem By, R. (2005) Organisational change management: A critical review. Journal of Change Management, 5(4): 369–380. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010500359250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010500359250
Touko Tcheumadjeu, L.C., Stuerz-Mutalibow, K., Hoeing, J., Harmann, D., Glaab, J. and Kaul, R. (2022) New Concepts to Improve Mobility by Digitization and Virtualization: An Analysis and Evaluation of the Technical Feasibility, in Martins, A.L., Ferreira, J.C. and Kocian, A. (Eds.), Intelligent Transport Systems, 426:26–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97603-3_3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97603-3_3
Trafikverket. (2025) About Trafikverket, Trafikverket, available at: https://bransch.trafikverket.se/en/startpage/about-us/Trafikverket/
Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R. (2002) On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change. Organization Science, 13(5): 567–582. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.5.567.7810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.5.567.7810
Turkulainen, V. (2022) Chapter 16: Contingency theory and the information processing view. In Handbook of Theories for Purchasing, Supply Chain and Management Research. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839104503.00020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839104503.00020
Woiceshyn, J., Huq, J.-L., Blades, K. and Pendharkar, S.R. (2020) Microdynamics of Implementing Planned Change on Organizations’ Front Line. Journal of Change Management, 20(1): 59–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2019.1602553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2019.1602553
Woodward, J. (1966) Industrial Organization : Theory and Practice, Oxford University Press, London.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Paulina Ekendahl, Izabelle Bäckström, Andreas Norrman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration agree to publish their articles under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This means means articles are free for anybody to read and download, and to copy and disseminate for non-commercial purposes as long as appropriate credit is given, a link is provided to the license, and any changes made are clearly indicated. Authors retain copyright of their work.
