Theology, Religious Studies, and Philosophy of Religion as Humanistic Disciplines: Critical Reflections on Realism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69574/aejpr.v1i1.22420Keywords:
theology, religious studies, philosophy of religion, philosophy of the humanities, transcendental philosophy, realism, pragmatismAbstract
This metaphilosophical paper discusses the nature of the philosophy of religion as an academic discipline. It may seem self-evident that the philosophy of religion is one of the humanities – along with neighboring fields of research within theology and religious studies – but it may also be argued that this is not obvious at all, as philosophical investigation can study the way the world is at the fundamental metaphysical level. Philosophers of religion, in particular, may claim to “directly” discuss the question of God’s existence vs. non-existence. The paper argues that settling the metaphilosophical question about the nature of the philosophy of religion presupposes considering the underlying issue of realism. From a transcendental-pragmatist perspective, the philosophy of religion is a humanistic discipline, but this cannot be non-circularly demonstrated to those presupposing metaphysical realism.
References
Allison, H.E. (2004 [1983]). Kant’s Transcendental Idealism – An Interpretation and Defense: Revised and Enlarged Edition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1cc2kjc
Burley, M. (2012). Contemplating Religious Forms of Life: Wittgenstein and D.Z. Phillips. London and New York: Continuum.
Byrne, P. (2003). Realism and God. Aldershot and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Devitt, M. (1991 [1984]). Realism and Truth. Oxford: Blackwell.
Herrmann, E. (2003). A Pragmatic Realist Philosophy of Religion. Ars Disputandi, 3(3), www.arsdisputandi.org. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15665399.2003.10819765
Kearney, R. (2010). Anatheism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Koistinen, T. (2000). Philosophy of Religion or Religious Philosophy? A Study of Contemporary Anglo-American Approaches. Helsinki: Luther-Agricola Society.
Koistinen, T. (2019). Contemplative Philosophy and the Problem of Relativism. In H. Rydenfelt, M. Bergman, & H.J. Koskinen (Eds.), Limits of Pragmatism and Challenges of Theodicy. Acta Philosophica Fennica 95. Helsinki: The Philosophical Society of Finland, pp. 163–173.
Koistinen, T. (2021). Contemporary Philosophical Apologetics: Some Methodological Criticisms. The International Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Society, 11(2), pp. 27-39. https://doi.org/10.18848/2154-8633/CGP/v11i02/27-39 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/2154-8633/CGP/v11i02/27-39
Koskinen, I. (2022). Participation and Objectivity. Philosophy of Science, 90(2), pp. 413–432. doi:10.1017/psa.2022.77 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2022.77
Kuhn, T.S. (1970 [1962]). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Loux, M.J. (2002). Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203438244
Margolis, J. (1995). Historied Thought, Constructed World. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Margolis, J. (2012). Pragmatism Ascendent: A Yard of Narrative, a Touch of Prophecy. Stanford: Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804783989
Martin, M. (1990). Atheism. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Niiniluoto, I. (1993). The Aim and Structure of Applied Research. Erkenntnis, 38, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01129020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01129020
Niiniluoto, I. (1999). Critical Scientific Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pihlström, S. (2020). Religious Truth, Pragmatic Realism, and Antitheodicy: On Viewing the World by Acknowledging the Other. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/HUP-2
Pihlström, S. (2021). Pragmatist Truth in the Post-Truth Age: Sincerity, Normativity, and Humanism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009047142
Pihlström, S. (2022). Toward a Pragmatist Philosophy of the Humanities. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Pihlström, S. (2023). Humanism, Antitheodicism, and the Critique of Meaning in Pragmatist Philosophy of Religion. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111247878-004
Putnam, H. (1990). Realism with a Human Face. (Ed.) J. Conant. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Putnam, H. (2016). Naturalism, Realism, and Normativity. (Ed.) M. De Caro. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674969117
Quine, W.V. (1992). Pursuit of Truth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Raatikainen, P. (2006). The Scope and Limits of Value-Freedom in Science. In H.J. Koskinen, S. Pihlström, & R. Vilkko (Eds.), Science – a Challenge to Philosophy? Lausanne, Switzerland: Peter Lang, pp. 323–331.
Reisch, G.A. (2018). The Politics of Paradigms. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schönbaumsfeld, G. (2023). Wittgenstein on Religious Belief. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009276061
Sellars, W. (1963). Science, Perception and Reality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Tucker, A. (ed). (2011). A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
Tuomela, R. (1985). Science, Action and Reality. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5446-5
Vainio, O.P. (2020). On Theology and Objectivity: A Northern Point of View to Analytic Theology. Journal of Analytic Theology, 8(1), pp. 390–404. https://doi.org/10.12978/jat.2020-8.1411-65210014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12978/jat.2020-8.1411-65210014
von Wright, G.H. (1963). Norm and Action. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Williams, B. (2006). Philosophy as a Humanistic Discipline. Cambridge, UK. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400827091
Winch, P. (1958). The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Wolterstorff, N. (1998). Is It Possible and Desirable for Theologians to Recover from Kant? Modern Theology, 14(1), pp. 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0025.00054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0025.00054
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sami Pihlström
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors of content published in the AGATHEOS retain the copyright to their works.
Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permits use, downloading, distribution, linking to and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
