The Metaphysics of Religious Diversity: From Homogenizing Theological Agendas to Conceptual Justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69574/aejpr.v1i1.22963Keywords:
John Hick, Hinduism, metaphysics, religious diversity, religious pluralism, ultimate realityAbstract
An increasing number of voices have been calling for philosophy of religion to expand beyond a preoccupation with the “rationality of theism.” Religious pluralist theories of religious diversity might be expected to exemplify a broader scope; in practice, however, such theories are often hampered by theological agendas that prioritize convergence over attention to differences. Focusing on approaches to the metaphysics of religious diversity, this article distinguishes between (a) approaches that prioritize the discovery of the fundamental truth behind specific forms of metaphysical belief and (b) approaches that foreground the variety of metaphysical beliefs held by diverse religious communities. Although these approaches need not be incompatible, the former is apt to emphasize homogeneity whereas the latter encourages awareness of nuance and variegation. Taking diversity among Hindu conceptions of the divine as a case in point, the article seeks to make conceptual space for a philosophy of religious diversity that is radically pluralist and critically descriptive.
References
Burley, M. (2019). Religious Diversity and Conceptual Schemes: Critically Appraising Internalist Pluralism. Sophia, 58(2), pp. 283–299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-018-0637-x
Burley, M. (2020a). A Radical Pluralist Philosophy of Religion: Cross-Cultural, Multireligious, Interdisciplinary. London: Bloomsbury. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350098343
Burley, M. (2020b). Religious Pluralisms: From Homogenization to Radicality. Sophia, 59(2), pp. 311–331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-017-0636-3
Byrne, P. (1995). Prolegomena to Religious Pluralism: Reference and Realism in Religion. Basingstoke: Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230390072
Byrne, P. (2011). A Philosophical Approach to Questions about Religious Diversity. In C. Meister (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religious Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 29–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195340136.003.0003
Cobb, J. B., Jr. (1990). Beyond ‘Pluralism’. In G. D’Costa (Ed.), Christian Uniqueness Reconsidered: The Myth of a Pluralistic Theology of Religions. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, pp. 81–95.
Cobb, J. B., Jr. (1993). Order Out of Chaos: A Philosophical Model of Interreligious Dialogue. In J. Kellenberger (Ed.), Inter-Religious Models and Criteria. New York: St Martin’s Press, pp. 71–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23017-4_5
Cotter, C. R. & D. G Robertson. (2016). Introduction: The World Religions Paradigm in Contemporary Religious Studies. In C. R. Cotter and D. G. Robertson (Eds.), After World Religions: Reconstructing Religious Studies. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1–20.
D’Costa, G. (1990). Preface. In G. D’Costa (Ed.), Christian Uniqueness Reconsidered: The Myth of a Pluralistic Theology of Religions. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, pp. viii–xxii.
D’Costa, G. (2016). Changing the Typology? Why Pluralism Should be Renamed Post-Christian Inclusivism. In E. J. Harris, P. Hedges & S. Hettiarachchi, (Eds.), Twenty-First Century Theologies of Religions: Retrospection and Future Prospects. Leiden: Brill, pp. 128–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004324077_010
Devi, N. U. (2007). Advaita Vedānta: A Logico-Cognitive Approach. Kochi: Sukṛtīndra Oriental Research Institute.
Dold, P. (2003). Kālī the Terrific and Her Tests: The Śākta Devotionalism of the Mahābhāgavata Purāṇa. In R. F. McDermott & J. J. Kripal (Eds.), Encountering Kālī: In the Margins, at the Center, in the West. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 39–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520928176-008
Draper, P. & J. L. Schellenberg (Eds). (2017). Renewing Philosophy of Religion: Exploratory Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198738909.001.0001
Garg, G. R. (1992). Encyclopaedia of the Hindu World, Vol. 3. New Delhi: Concept.
Griffin, D. R. (2005). John Cobb’s Whiteheadian Complementary Pluralism. In D. R. Griffin (Ed.), Deep Religious Pluralism. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, pp. 39–66.
Harris, E. J., Hedges, P. & S. Hettiarachchi. (2016). Introduction: Theologies of Religions in the Twenty-First Century. In E. J. Harris, P. Hedges & S. Hettiarachchi (Eds.), Twenty-First Century Theologies of Religions: Retrospection and Future Prospects. Leiden: Brill, pp. 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004324077_002
Harrison, V. S. (2012). An Internalist Pluralist Solution to the Problem of Religious and Ethical Diversity. Sophia, 51(1), pp. 71–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-011-0245-5
Harrison, V. S. (2015). Religious Pluralism. In G. Oppy (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy of Religion. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 257–269.
Hedges, P. & A. Race (Eds). (2008). Christian Approaches to Other Faiths. London: SCM Press.
Heim, S. M. (1995). Salvations: Truth and Difference in Religion. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis.
Hick, J. (1984). Religious Pluralism. In F. Whaling (Ed.), The World’s Religious Traditions: Current Perspectives in Religious Studies: Essays in Honour of Wilfred Cantwell Smith. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, pp. 147–164.
Hick, J. (1990). Philosophy of Religion (4th edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hick, J. (2004) [1989]. An Interpretation of Religion: Human Responses to the Transcendent (2nd edition). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hick, J. (2005) [1993]. The Metaphor of God Incarnate: Christology in a Pluralistic Age (2nd edition). London: SCM Press.
Jaspers, K. (1953) [1949]. The Origin and Goal of History, trans. Michael Bullock. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Jeanrond, W. G. & J. L. Rike (Eds). (1991). Radical Pluralism and Truth: David Tracy and the Hermeneutics of Religion. New York: Crossroads.
Kanaris, J. (Ed). (2018). Reconfigurations of Philosophy of Religion: A Possible Future. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781438469102
Kinsley, D. (1997). Tantric Visions of the Divine Feminine: The Ten Mahāvidyās. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520917729
Knepper, T. D. (2013). The Ends of Philosophy of Religion: Terminus and Telos. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137324412
Müller, F. M. (1901) [1878]. Lectures on the Origin and Growth of Religion: As Illustrated by the Religions of India. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.
Oldenberg, H. (1988) [1894]. The Religion of the Veda, trans. Shridhar B. Shrotri. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Parthasarathy, V. R. & I. Parthasarathy. (2009). Devi: Goddesses in Indian Art and Literature. Delhi: Bharatiya Kala Prakashan.
Phillips, D. Z. (2007). Philosophy’s Radical Pluralism in the House of Intellect – A Reply to Henk Vroom. In A. (Ed.), D. Z. Phillips’ Contemplative Philosophy of Religion: Questions and Responses. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 197–211.
Schilbrack, K. (2014). Philosophy and the Study of Religions: A Manifesto. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394268061
Schmidt-Leukel, P. (2017). Religious Pluralism and Interreligious Theology: The Gifford Lectures—An Extended Edition. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis.
Singh Nabha, Bhai Kahn. (2006) [1898]. Sikhs: We Are Not Hindus, Preetpal Singh Bumra (Ed.), trans. Jarnail Singh. Amritsar: Singh Brothers.
Strawson, P. F. (1985). Skepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/stra92820
Whaling, F. (1979). Śaṅkara and Buddhism. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 7(1), pp. 1–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02561251
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (1998). Culture and Value: A Selection from the Posthumous Remains, G. H. von Wright & Nyman, H. (Eds.), revised by A. Pichler, trans. P. Winch. Oxford: Blackwell.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mikel Burley
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors of content published in the AGATHEOS retain the copyright to their works.
Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permits use, downloading, distribution, linking to and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
