Writing Twentieth-Century Music History in Postmodern Times
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58698/stm-sjm.v3.56383Abstract
STM-Online Special:
Musikhistoria och den högre musikutbildningen i förändringens tid
Music History and Higher Music Education in a Time of Change
Joakim Tillman Writing Twentieth-Century Music History in Postmodern Times
Departing from Christopher Williams’s criticism of Robert P. Morgan’s handbook on twentieth-century music, this article discusses important problems concerning the writing of twentieth-century music history, including the selection of composers and canon formation, historical importance and construction of history, and relevance and scope of context. The infinite variety of reality makes it impossible to describe everything from all conceivable points of view. Therefore, history must be written from some perspective, horizon, or whatever you chose to call it. The article argues that in a time where all metanarratives have been abandoned, modernism can no longer be the only relevant perspective in the writing of twentieth-century art music, at least not in a general handbook intended for courses that form students’ opinions of the subject. Instead we should make students aware of different problems and perspectives involved in the writing of twentieth-century music history. Thus, the best solution in a pluralistic climate is an eclectic approach, which does not fall into the trap of total relativism.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2000 Joakim Tillman

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to STM-SJM retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to Svenska samfundet för musikforskning. Read the journal's full Copyright- and Licensing Policy.
