Omtänksam teknik? Appar som innovation mot könsbaserat våld

Författare

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55870/tgv.v44i3.14800

Nyckelord:

mobilapplikationer, könsbaserat våld, social innovation, socio-tekniska föreställningar, digital teknik, populärfeminism

Abstract

Mobile applications against gender-based violence are a global and growing phenomenon, with hundreds of apps available in the international market. In this article, we analyze how apps and digital technologies are discursively construed as measures against (gender-based) intimate partner violence in marketing and media coverage of three Swedish businesses and their digital tools aiming to combat and prevent violence. Focusing on sociotechnical imaginaries about the potential of technology, we analyze how the intersection between digital technology, innovation culture, and feminism affects the understanding of violence as a social problem and what type of solutions that become desirable. We do so by first scrutinizing how the selected apps’ technical functions are represented. These representations emphasize, first, a need for more, objective, and data-driven information about the nature and extent of violence, among both help-seekers and supporting institutions, and, second, the apps’ potential as tools for help-seeking and self-care, partly akin to mental health apps. While we share the conviction that digital communication can be a useful tool for help-seeking, we argue that the representations of these technical functions as solving the problem with gendered violence (a claim accentuated by the competition driven innovation context), produce a simplified and post-ideological understanding of the persistence of violence, as rooted in a lack of individual and professional insights and risk-assessments. Simultaneously, the risks of bias and increased surveillance associated with user data analyses, often perpetuating structural inequalities, are left unmentioned, something we conclusively argue is highly important for future studies and uses of technology against gendered violence.

Nedladdningar

Nedladdningsdata är inte tillgängliga än.

Referenser

Ajjawi, Rola och Eva, Kevin (2021) The problem with solutions. Medical Education 55(1): 2-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14413

Banet-Weiser, Sarah (2018) Empowered: popular feminism and popular misogyny. Duke: University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478002772

Barter, Christine och Koulu, Sanna (2021) Digital technologies and gender-based violence – mechanisms for oppression, activism and recovery. Journal of Gender-Based Violence 5(3): 367–375. https://doi.org/10.1332/239868021X16315286472556 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/239868021X16315286472556

Beaton, Brian (2015) Safety as net work: “Apps Against Abuse” and the digital labour of sexual assault prevention. MediaTropes 5(1): 105–124.

Becker, Dana (2005) The Myth of empowerment: women and the therapeutic culture in America. New York: University Press.

Bivens, Rena och Hasinoff, Amy Adele (2018) Rape: Is there an app for that? An empirical analysis of the features of anti-rape apps. Information, Communication & Society 21(8): 1050-1067. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1309444 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1309444

Boëthius, Susanne, Åkerström, Malin och Hydén, Margareta (2022) The double-edged sword – abused women’s experiences of digital technology. European Journal of Social Work 26(3): 506-518. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2022.2040437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2022.2040437

Burman, Monica och Öhman, Ann (2014) Challenging gender and violence: Positions and discourses in Swedish and international contexts. Women’s Studies International Forum. 46(C): 81–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.12.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.12.004

Bäckström Olofsson, Hanna och Goicolea, Isabel (2024) Sisterhood at a distance: Doing feminist support work online. Affilia 39(2): 214-228. https://doi. org/10.1177/08861099231181583 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08861099231181583

Cave, Stephen och Dihal, Kanta (2020) The whiteness of AI. Philosophy & Technology. 33(4): 685–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00415-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00415-6

Dobash, Rebecca E. och Dobash, Russel P. (1992) Women, Violence, and Social change. London: Routledge.

Dodge, Alexa (2018) The digital witness: The role of digital evidence in criminal justice responses to sexual violence. Feminist Theory 9(3): 303–321. https://doi. org/10.1177/1464700117743049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700117743049

Eisenhut, Katharina, Sauerborn, Ela, García-Moreno, Claudia och Wild, Verina (2020) Mobile applications addressing violence against women: a systematic review. BMJ Global Health 5(4): e001954–e001954. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001954 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001954

Ekström, Veronika (2017) Negotiating and justifying social services’ support for female victims of domestic violence. Nordic Social Work Research 7(1): 18-29. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/2156857X.2016.1203813 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2016.1203813

Enander, Viveka och Holmberg, Carina (2008) Why does she leave? The leaving process(es) of battered women. Health Care for Women International 29(3): 200-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399330801913802 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07399330801913802

Gendera, Sandra, Valentine, Kylie och Breckenridge, Jan (2021) The significance of technology as both a resource in enhancing safety, and a means of perpetrating violence: the implications for policy and practice. Journal of Gender-Based Violence 5(3): 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1332/239868021X16255656776492 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/239868021X16255656776492

Gengler, Amanda (2012) Defying (dis)empowerment in a battered women’s shelter: moral rhetorics, intersectionality, and processes of control and resistance. Social Problems 59(4): 501–52. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2012.59.4.501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2012.59.4.501

Harkin, Diarmaid (2019) Regulating private sector security provision for victims of domestic violence. Theoretical Criminology 23(3): 415–432. https://doi. org/10.1177/1362480617737760 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480617737760

Helmersson, Sara (2017) Mellan systerskap och behandling: omförhandlingar inom ett förändrat stödfält för våldsutsatta kvinnor. Avhandling. Lund: Socialhögskolan, Lunds universitet.

Henne, Kathryn, Shelby, Renee och Jenna, Harb (2021) The datafication of #MeToo: whiteness, racial capitalism, and anti-violence technologies. Big Data & Society 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211055898 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211055898

Jasanoff, Sheila och Kim, Sang-Hyun (2009) Containing the atom: sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47(2): 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4

Jämställdhetsmyndigheten (2022) Uppgifter om våld är inget undantag. Redovisning av kartläggning av uppgifter om våld eller andra övergrepp i mål om vårdnad, boende och umgänge. Rapport 2022:1. Göteborg: Jämställdhetsmyndigheten.

Kelly, Liz (2011) Standing the Test of Time? Reflections on the Concept of the Continuum of Sexual Violence. Brown, Jennifer och Walklate, Sandra (red) Handbook on Sexual Violence. New York: Routledge.

Kjellberg, Josefin (2023) Fri från (efter)våldet? Om partnervåldsutsatta kvinnors motstånd, uppbrott och stödbehov. Avhandling. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.

Laclau, Ernesto och Mouffe, Chantal (1985) Hegemony & socialist strategy. London: Verso.

Lauri, Johanna (2021) The discourse of social innovation and gender equality. Prometheus 37(1): 27–43. https://doi.org/10.13169/prometheus.37.1.0027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13169/prometheus.37.1.0027

Lauri, Marcus, Lauri, Johanna och Linander, Ida (2023) Women’s shelters and private shelters discursive struggle: separatism, security and social change. Nordic Social Work Research. Publicerad online 21 dec 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/215685 7X.2023.2297984 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2023.2297984

Lauri, Marcus, Carbin, Maria och Linander, Ida (2023) The rise of carceral feminism in Sweden: Analysing political debate and policy on men’s violence against women. Women’s Studies International Forum 99 (2023): 102780. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.wsif.2023.102780 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2023.102780

Lauri, Marcus och Lauri, Johanna (2024) In the business of gendered violence: the private shelter discourse in Sweden. Critical and Radical Social Work. An International Journal 12(3): 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1332/204986021x16826760140926 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/204986021X16826760140926

Lundberg, Lisa och Bergmark, Åke (2021) Self-perceived competence and willingness to ask about intimate partner violence among Swedish social workers. European Journal of Social Work. 24(2): 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1540970 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1540970

Lundgren, Eva (2004) Våldets normaliseringsprocess. Stockholm: Riksorganisationen för kvinnojourer och tjejjourer i Sverige (ROKS).

Lupton, Deborah (2014) Apps as Artefacts: Towards a Critical Perspective on Mobile Health and Medical Apps. Societies, 4(4): 606-622. https://doi.org/10.3390/ soc4040606 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc4040606

Mason, Corinne och Magnet, Shoshana (2012) Surveillance Studies and Violence Against Women. Surveillance & Society. 10(2): 105–118. https://doi.org/10.24908/ ss.v10i2.4094 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v10i2.4094

McDermott, M, Joan och Garofalo, James (2004) When Advocacy for Domestic Violence Victims Backfires: Types and Sources of Victim Disempowerment. Violence Against Women, 10(11): 1245–1266. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780120426899 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801204268999

Morozov, Evgeny (2013) To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: Public Affairs.

Mouffe, Chantal (2022) Towards a green democratic revolution. Left populism and the power of affects. London: Verso.

Nichols, Andrea (2013) Meaning-making and domestic violence victim advocacy: an examination of feminist identities, ideologies, and practices. Feminist Criminology 8(3): 177–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/155708511348272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085113482727

Rutherford, Alexandra (2018) Feminism, psychology, and the gendering of neoliberal subjectivity: From critique to disruption. Theory & Psychology 28(5): 619–644. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0959354318797194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318797194

Ryding, Anna (2005) Välviljans variationer: moraliska gränsdragningar inom brottsofferjourer. Avhandling. Lund: Lunds universitet.

Sadowski, Jathan (2019) When data is capital: datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data & Society 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718820549 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718820549

Scott-Smith, Tom (2016) Humanitarian neophilia: the ‘innovation turn’ and its implications. Third World Quarterly 37(12): 2229-2251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659 7.2016.1176856 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1176856

Shelby, Renee (2023) Technology, sexual violence, and power-evasive politics: mapping the anti-violence sociotechnical imaginary. Science, Technology, & Human Values 48(3): 552–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439211046047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439211046047

Shelby, Renee (2020) Techno-physical feminism: anti-rape technology, gender, and corporeal surveillance. Feminist Media Studies 20(8): 1088–1109. https://doi.org/10.1080 /14680777.2019.1662823 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1662823

Shelby, Renee, Harb, Jenna Imad och Henne, Kathryn (2021) Whiteness in and through data protection: an intersectional approach to anti-violence apps and #MeToo bots. Internet Policy Review 10(4): 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.4.1589

Sim, Kate (2021) Respond and resolve: a critical feminist inquiry for technologies of sexual governance. Global Perspectives 2(1): 25434. https://doi.org/10.1525/gp.2021.25434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/gp.2021.25434

Sveiby, Karl Erik, Gripenberg, Pernilla och Segercrantz, Beata (red) (2012) Challenging the innovation paradigm. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203120972

Trnka, Susanna (2016) Digital care: agency and temporality in young people’s use of health apps. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society (2): 248–265. https://doi. org/10.17351/ests2016.119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2016.119

van Holstein, Ellen (2018) Digital geographies of grassroots securitisation. Social & Cultural Geography 19(8): 1097–1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2018.1446217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2018.1446217

Vinnova (2024) Innovationstävlingar. https://www.vinnova.se/publikationer/ nnovationstavlingar/ [2024-03-06].

White, Deborah och McMillan, Lesley (2020) Innovating the problem away? A critical study of anti-rape technologies. Violence Against Women 26(10): 1120-1140. https://doi. org/10.1177/1077801219856115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219856115

Downloads

Publicerad

2024-12-27

Nummer

Sektion

Fristående artiklar