Den armeniska frågan

Folklivsforskning — folkmordsforskning

Authors

  • Åke Daun Nordiska museet

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54807/kp.v9.31258

Keywords:

genocide, genocide studies, folkmord, folklivsforskning, social behaviour, responsibility, ansvar, sociala beteenden

Abstract

For several reasons, genocide may be studied as "folklife". For one thing, mass murdering is often carried out by ordinary people, "like you and me". A second criterion is the collective nature of genocide, which makes it a social behaviour. Finally, genocide is a phenomenon which is open to multidimensional analysis, just like any institutionalised human behaviour. However, this being so, the question of moral responsibility becomes problematic, particularly in historical retrospect. For example, what about Turkey's responsibility for the genocide of the Armenians in the days of the Ottoman Empire? International law and social science give divergent answers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Åke Daun, Nordiska museet

Åke Daun är sedan 1981 innehavare av den Hallwylska professuren i etnologi vid Nordiska museet. Dessförinnan var han under flera år projektledare för forskningsgruppen Människa-närmiljö vid Arkitektursektionen, KTH. Hans vetenskapliga profil kan bäst beskrivas som tvärvetenskaplig med särskild betoning av psykologiska förklaringsmodeller.

Downloads

Published

2000-12-01

How to Cite

Daun, Åke. (2000). Den armeniska frågan: Folklivsforskning — folkmordsforskning. Kulturella Perspektiv – Svensk Etnologisk Tidskrift, 9(4), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.54807/kp.v9.31258

Issue

Section

Research Articles