Common sense and climate mitigation

Articulations of objection to wind power establishment

Abstract

This article examines the discourse surrounding wind-power establishment in Sweden, analyzing how common sense is mobilized in opposition to planned projects. The analysis draws on media coverage of opinion pieces. Identifying three prominent forms of articulation, the study highlights how these narratives frame wind turbines as symbols of conflict – between local environmental concerns, regional identity and democratic influence, and financial stability. Drawing on a critical folkloristic perspective, the article explores the complex interaction between local sentiments and broader political discourses, illustrating how local transition conflicts function as arenas for ideological struggle and the articulation of competing values. Criticism of market-driven mechanisms may enhance civic involvement; however, there is a parallel risk that such mobilization will be subsumed into larger political discourses designed to obstruct climate transformation. Under these conditions, the climate crisis and democratic accountability may increasingly be recast as elements of an expanding “culture war” narrative.